The pointing out of black hole failure
in [Physics]
|
Prev: BP is no stranger to major accidents
Next: Climate change in a shoebox: Right result, wrong physics
From: BURT on 12 May 2010 13:24 On May 12, 6:26 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On May 11, 7:38 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > On May 10, 8:22 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > > > On 5/10/2010 9:53 PM, BURT wrote: > > > > > Mitch Raemsch; I have disproven black holes; we are not seeing them > > > > You have achieved nothing. > > > Is that why you are here? > > > It is only a matter of time until the correction in theory will be > > complete. > > Yes, you said you had the correction. Where is it? > > > > > The theory of gravity is a limited acceleration theory. > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - It is limited acceleration. The math of acceleration is passing through every speed down to the infinitely small. GR violates SR laws of motion in the case of event horizons. Mitch Raemsch
From: purple on 12 May 2010 13:28 On 5/12/2010 12:24 PM, BURT wrote: > On May 12, 6:26 am, PD<thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On May 11, 7:38 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>> On May 10, 8:22 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >> >>>> On 5/10/2010 9:53 PM, BURT wrote: >> >>>>> Mitch Raemsch; I have disproven black holes; we are not seeing them >> >>>> You have achieved nothing. >> >>> Is that why you are here? >> >>> It is only a matter of time until the correction in theory will be >>> complete. >> >> Yes, you said you had the correction. Where is it? >> >> >> >>> The theory of gravity is a limited acceleration theory. >> >>> Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > It is limited acceleration. The math of acceleration is passing > through every speed down to the infinitely small. > > GR violates SR laws of motion in the case of event horizons. > > Mitch Raemsch Do you even know what math is? It isn't babbling.
From: BURT on 12 May 2010 13:59 On May 12, 10:28 am, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > On 5/12/2010 12:24 PM, BURT wrote: > > > > > > > On May 12, 6:26 am, PD<thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> On May 11, 7:38 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > >>> On May 10, 8:22 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > >>>> On 5/10/2010 9:53 PM, BURT wrote: > > >>>>> Mitch Raemsch; I have disproven black holes; we are not seeing them > > >>>> You have achieved nothing. > > >>> Is that why you are here? > > >>> It is only a matter of time until the correction in theory will be > >>> complete. > > >> Yes, you said you had the correction. Where is it? > > >>> The theory of gravity is a limited acceleration theory. > > >>> Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > It is limited acceleration. The math of acceleration is passing > > through every speed down to the infinitely small. > > > GR violates SR laws of motion in the case of event horizons. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > Do you even know what math is? It isn't babbling.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Math is quantitative thinking. The math for motion is an acceleration limit and this dsproves black holes. Mitch Raemsch
From: purple on 12 May 2010 16:35 On 5/12/2010 12:59 PM, BURT wrote: > On May 12, 10:28 am, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >> On 5/12/2010 12:24 PM, BURT wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> On May 12, 6:26 am, PD<thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On May 11, 7:38 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>>>> On May 10, 8:22 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >> >>>>>> On 5/10/2010 9:53 PM, BURT wrote: >> >>>>>>> Mitch Raemsch; I have disproven black holes; we are not seeing them >> >>>>>> You have achieved nothing. >> >>>>> Is that why you are here? >> >>>>> It is only a matter of time until the correction in theory will be >>>>> complete. >> >>>> Yes, you said you had the correction. Where is it? >> >>>>> The theory of gravity is a limited acceleration theory. >> >>>>> Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - >> >>>> - Show quoted text - >> >>> It is limited acceleration. The math of acceleration is passing >>> through every speed down to the infinitely small. >> >>> GR violates SR laws of motion in the case of event horizons. >> >>> Mitch Raemsch >> >> Do you even know what math is? It isn't babbling.- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > Math is quantitative thinking. The math for motion is an acceleration > limit and this dsproves black holes. Show me. Saying so isn't enough.
From: BURT on 12 May 2010 16:42
On May 12, 1:35 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > On 5/12/2010 12:59 PM, BURT wrote: > > > > > > > On May 12, 10:28 am, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > >> On 5/12/2010 12:24 PM, BURT wrote: > > >>> On May 12, 6:26 am, PD<thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> On May 11, 7:38 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > >>>>> On May 10, 8:22 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > >>>>>> On 5/10/2010 9:53 PM, BURT wrote: > > >>>>>>> Mitch Raemsch; I have disproven black holes; we are not seeing them > > >>>>>> You have achieved nothing. > > >>>>> Is that why you are here? > > >>>>> It is only a matter of time until the correction in theory will be > >>>>> complete. > > >>>> Yes, you said you had the correction. Where is it? > > >>>>> The theory of gravity is a limited acceleration theory. > > >>>>> Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > >>>> - Show quoted text - > > >>> It is limited acceleration. The math of acceleration is passing > >>> through every speed down to the infinitely small. > > >>> GR violates SR laws of motion in the case of event horizons. > > >>> Mitch Raemsch > > >> Do you even know what math is? It isn't babbling.- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > Math is quantitative thinking. The math for motion is an acceleration > > limit and this dsproves black holes. > > Show me. Saying so isn't enough.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Yes. It is enough because it is the truth. We are not seeing black holes. Mitch Raemsch |