The pointing out of black hole failure
in [Physics]
|
Prev: BP is no stranger to major accidents
Next: Climate change in a shoebox: Right result, wrong physics
From: purple on 12 May 2010 18:09 On 5/12/2010 3:42 PM, BURT wrote: > On May 12, 1:35 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >> On 5/12/2010 12:59 PM, BURT wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> On May 12, 10:28 am, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >>>> On 5/12/2010 12:24 PM, BURT wrote: >> >>>>> On May 12, 6:26 am, PD<thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On May 11, 7:38 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>>>>>> On May 10, 8:22 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >> >>>>>>>> On 5/10/2010 9:53 PM, BURT wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> Mitch Raemsch; I have disproven black holes; we are not seeing them >> >>>>>>>> You have achieved nothing. >> >>>>>>> Is that why you are here? >> >>>>>>> It is only a matter of time until the correction in theory will be >>>>>>> complete. >> >>>>>> Yes, you said you had the correction. Where is it? >> >>>>>>> The theory of gravity is a limited acceleration theory. >> >>>>>>> Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - >> >>>>>> - Show quoted text - >> >>>>> It is limited acceleration. The math of acceleration is passing >>>>> through every speed down to the infinitely small. >> >>>>> GR violates SR laws of motion in the case of event horizons. >> >>>>> Mitch Raemsch >> >>>> Do you even know what math is? It isn't babbling.- Hide quoted text - >> >>>> - Show quoted text - >> >>> Math is quantitative thinking. The math for motion is an acceleration >>> limit and this dsproves black holes. >> >> Show me. Saying so isn't enough.- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > Yes. It is enough because it is the truth. We are not seeing black > holes. > > Mitch Raemsch 2=3 How's that for you?
From: Don Stockbauer on 13 May 2010 19:49 On May 12, 5:09 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > On 5/12/2010 3:42 PM, BURT wrote: > > > > > > > On May 12, 1:35 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > >> On 5/12/2010 12:59 PM, BURT wrote: > > >>> On May 12, 10:28 am, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > >>>> On 5/12/2010 12:24 PM, BURT wrote: > > >>>>> On May 12, 6:26 am, PD<thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> On May 11, 7:38 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > >>>>>>> On May 10, 8:22 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> On 5/10/2010 9:53 PM, BURT wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> Mitch Raemsch; I have disproven black holes; we are not seeing them > > >>>>>>>> You have achieved nothing. > > >>>>>>> Is that why you are here? > > >>>>>>> It is only a matter of time until the correction in theory will be > >>>>>>> complete. > > >>>>>> Yes, you said you had the correction. Where is it? > > >>>>>>> The theory of gravity is a limited acceleration theory. > > >>>>>>> Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > >>>>>> - Show quoted text - > > >>>>> It is limited acceleration. The math of acceleration is passing > >>>>> through every speed down to the infinitely small. > > >>>>> GR violates SR laws of motion in the case of event horizons. > > >>>>> Mitch Raemsch > > >>>> Do you even know what math is? It isn't babbling.- Hide quoted text - > > >>>> - Show quoted text - > > >>> Math is quantitative thinking. The math for motion is an acceleration > >>> limit and this dsproves black holes. > > >> Show me. Saying so isn't enough.- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > Yes. It is enough because it is the truth. We are not seeing black > > holes. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > 2=3 How's that for you? Mitch , why don't you see for yourself, with your own body, if someoen can survie the 4,800 foot fall from the rim to the bottom of the Grand Canyon.
From: BURT on 14 May 2010 00:26 On May 11, 5:58 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On May 10, 9:53 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 10, 3:41 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On May 10, 4:50 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 10, 2:46 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On May 10, 4:06 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 6, 4:23 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 5/6/2010 4:32 PM, BURT wrote: > > > > > > > > > On May 6, 1:39 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >> On 5/6/2010 2:54 PM, PD wrote: > > > > > > > >> He's never done otherwise. We can readily see how far he's gotten > > > > > > > >> in physics and in life.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > The only way to win is not to play the game. > > > > > > > > "Not playing the game" precludes winning. > > > > > > > You're the looser. I don't play the game. > > > > > > > > > Black hole theory is wrong. > > > > > > > > At the limits, every model begins to go wrong. > > > > > > > My point is I know how to correct it. That is what is important.. > > > > > > No you don't. All you've done is whine that it is wrong. You don't > > > > > have a better theory. When you do, go ahead and publish it. By the > > > > > way, your name hasn't shown up yet on the Nobel site.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > Please prove that it doesn't need a correction. > > > > I didn't say it didn't need a correction. You said you had a > > > correction. Please provide it. > > Where is this correction you said you had? > > > > > > > > > You want to hold on to > > > > the past and I am the opposite. I am a pioneer. > > > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > Acceleration has a limit. Gravity is an acceleration. This is the > > srength of gravity with a limit. There are no black holes. > > > Mitch Raemsch; I have disproven black holes; we are not seeing them- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Gravity is limited acceleration math. Mitch Raemsch
From: BURT on 16 May 2010 16:19 On May 13, 9:26 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On May 11, 5:58 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 10, 9:53 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On May 10, 3:41 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 10, 4:50 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > On May 10, 2:46 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 10, 4:06 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On May 6, 4:23 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 5/6/2010 4:32 PM, BURT wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On May 6, 1:39 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > >> On 5/6/2010 2:54 PM, PD wrote: > > > > > > > > >> He's never done otherwise. We can readily see how far he's gotten > > > > > > > > >> in physics and in life.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > The only way to win is not to play the game. > > > > > > > > > "Not playing the game" precludes winning. > > > > > > > > You're the looser. I don't play the game. > > > > > > > > > > Black hole theory is wrong. > > > > > > > > > At the limits, every model begins to go wrong. > > > > > > > > My point is I know how to correct it. That is what is important. > > > > > > > No you don't. All you've done is whine that it is wrong. You don't > > > > > > have a better theory. When you do, go ahead and publish it. By the > > > > > > way, your name hasn't shown up yet on the Nobel site.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > Please prove that it doesn't need a correction. > > > > > I didn't say it didn't need a correction. You said you had a > > > > correction. Please provide it. > > > Where is this correction you said you had? > > > > > > You want to hold on to > > > > > the past and I am the opposite. I am a pioneer. > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > Acceleration has a limit. Gravity is an acceleration. This is the > > > srength of gravity with a limit. There are no black holes. > > > > Mitch Raemsch; I have disproven black holes; we are not seeing them- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Gravity is limited acceleration math. > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Gravity gives a geometric center to space. MItch Raemsch
From: BURT on 18 May 2010 14:05
On May 16, 1:19 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On May 13, 9:26 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 11, 5:58 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On May 10, 9:53 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 10, 3:41 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On May 10, 4:50 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 10, 2:46 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On May 10, 4:06 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On May 6, 4:23 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On 5/6/2010 4:32 PM, BURT wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On May 6, 1:39 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> On 5/6/2010 2:54 PM, PD wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> He's never done otherwise. We can readily see how far he's gotten > > > > > > > > > >> in physics and in life.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > The only way to win is not to play the game. > > > > > > > > > > "Not playing the game" precludes winning. > > > > > > > > > You're the looser. I don't play the game. > > > > > > > > > > > Black hole theory is wrong. > > > > > > > > > > At the limits, every model begins to go wrong. > > > > > > > > > My point is I know how to correct it. That is what is important. > > > > > > > > No you don't. All you've done is whine that it is wrong. You don't > > > > > > > have a better theory. When you do, go ahead and publish it. By the > > > > > > > way, your name hasn't shown up yet on the Nobel site.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > Please prove that it doesn't need a correction. > > > > > > I didn't say it didn't need a correction. You said you had a > > > > > correction. Please provide it. > > > > Where is this correction you said you had? > > > > > > > You want to hold on to > > > > > > the past and I am the opposite. I am a pioneer. > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > Acceleration has a limit. Gravity is an acceleration. This is the > > > > srength of gravity with a limit. There are no black holes. > > > > > Mitch Raemsch; I have disproven black holes; we are not seeing them- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > Gravity is limited acceleration math. > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Gravity gives a geometric center to space. > > MItch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - In Pound Rebka for black holes there are violations of the laws of light energy. Both zero and infinite energy light is predicted emitted at the event horizons. These predictions along with others invalidate black hole theory. Mitch Raemsch |