From: BURT on
On May 6, 4:23 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote:
> On 5/6/2010 4:32 PM, BURT wrote:
>
> > On May 6, 1:39 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com>  wrote:
> >> On 5/6/2010 2:54 PM, PD wrote:
> >> He's never done otherwise. We can readily see how far he's gotten
> >> in physics and in life.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > The only way to win is not to play the game.
>
> "Not playing the game" precludes winning.
>
> > Black hole theory is wrong.
>
> At the limits, every model begins to go wrong.

Right. Black holes have been demonstrated theoretically wrong.
GR can predict only a limiting case and is therefore incomplete.
A limited acceleration theory is a theory of limited gravity strength
which is a more complete theory.

Mitch Raemsch

From: purple on
On 5/6/2010 6:44 PM, BURT wrote:
> On May 6, 4:23 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote:
>> On 5/6/2010 4:32 PM, BURT wrote:
>>
>>> On May 6, 1:39 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote:
>>>> On 5/6/2010 2:54 PM, PD wrote:
>>>> He's never done otherwise. We can readily see how far he's gotten
>>>> in physics and in life.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>>> The only way to win is not to play the game.
>>
>> "Not playing the game" precludes winning.
>>
>>> Black hole theory is wrong.
>>
>> At the limits, every model begins to go wrong.
>
> Right. Black holes have been demonstrated theoretically wrong.

No.

> GR can predict only a limiting case and is therefore incomplete.

At the limits, every model begins to go wrong.

> A limited acceleration theory is a theory of limited gravity strength
> which is a more complete theory.

Where's your proof?
From: BURT on
On May 6, 5:08 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote:
> On 5/6/2010 6:44 PM, BURT wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 6, 4:23 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com>  wrote:
> >> On 5/6/2010 4:32 PM, BURT wrote:
>
> >>> On May 6, 1:39 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com>    wrote:
> >>>> On 5/6/2010 2:54 PM, PD wrote:
> >>>> He's never done otherwise. We can readily see how far he's gotten
> >>>> in physics and in life.- Hide quoted text -
>
> >>> The only way to win is not to play the game.
>
> >> "Not playing the game" precludes winning.
>
> >>> Black hole theory is wrong.
>
> >> At the limits, every model begins to go wrong.
>
> > Right. Black holes have been demonstrated theoretically wrong.
>
> No.
>
> > GR can predict only a limiting case and is therefore incomplete.
>
> At the limits, every model begins to go wrong.
>
> > A limited acceleration theory is a theory of limited gravity strength
> > which is a more complete theory.
>
> Where's your proof?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

My proof is that you are wrong.

Einstein equated gravity with acceleration. That there is a limit to
both is not hard to see.

Mitch Raemsch
From: purple on
On 5/6/2010 7:53 PM, BURT wrote:
> On May 6, 5:08 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote:
>> On 5/6/2010 6:44 PM, BURT wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On May 6, 4:23 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote:
>>>> On 5/6/2010 4:32 PM, BURT wrote:
>>
>>>>> On May 6, 1:39 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 5/6/2010 2:54 PM, PD wrote:
>>>>>> He's never done otherwise. We can readily see how far he's gotten
>>>>>> in physics and in life.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>>>>> The only way to win is not to play the game.
>>
>>>> "Not playing the game" precludes winning.
>>
>>>>> Black hole theory is wrong.
>>
>>>> At the limits, every model begins to go wrong.
>>
>>> Right. Black holes have been demonstrated theoretically wrong.
>>
>> No.
>>
>>> GR can predict only a limiting case and is therefore incomplete.
>>
>> At the limits, every model begins to go wrong.
>>
>>> A limited acceleration theory is a theory of limited gravity strength
>>> which is a more complete theory.
>>
>> Where's your proof?- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> My proof is that you are wrong.

Bwahahahahahahahahaha!

All I did was ask you to provide a proof. You have not.
From: BURT on
On May 6, 6:57 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote:
> On 5/6/2010 7:53 PM, BURT wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 6, 5:08 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com>  wrote:
> >> On 5/6/2010 6:44 PM, BURT wrote:
>
> >>> On May 6, 4:23 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com>    wrote:
> >>>> On 5/6/2010 4:32 PM, BURT wrote:
>
> >>>>> On May 6, 1:39 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com>      wrote:
> >>>>>> On 5/6/2010 2:54 PM, PD wrote:
> >>>>>> He's never done otherwise. We can readily see how far he's gotten
> >>>>>> in physics and in life.- Hide quoted text -
>
> >>>>> The only way to win is not to play the game.
>
> >>>> "Not playing the game" precludes winning.
>
> >>>>> Black hole theory is wrong.
>
> >>>> At the limits, every model begins to go wrong.
>
> >>> Right. Black holes have been demonstrated theoretically wrong.
>
> >> No.
>
> >>> GR can predict only a limiting case and is therefore incomplete.
>
> >> At the limits, every model begins to go wrong.
>
> >>> A limited acceleration theory is a theory of limited gravity strength
> >>> which is a more complete theory.
>
> >> Where's your proof?- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > My proof is that you are wrong.
>
> Bwahahahahahahahahaha!
>
> All I did was ask you to provide a proof. You have not.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Why do I need to prove anything to anyone?

No. It can be seen that GR violates SR motion laws and therefore is a
limited case of a more complete theory of gravity one that has limited
strength or acceleration as Einstein said.

Mitch Raemsch