From: BURT on
On May 6, 4:23 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote:
> On 5/6/2010 4:32 PM, BURT wrote:
>
> > On May 6, 1:39 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com>  wrote:
> >> On 5/6/2010 2:54 PM, PD wrote:
> >> He's never done otherwise. We can readily see how far he's gotten
> >> in physics and in life.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > The only way to win is not to play the game.
>
> "Not playing the game" precludes winning.
>
> > Black hole theory is wrong.
>
> At the limits, every model begins to go wrong.

There should be a limited acceleration and therefore strength gravity
theory.

Mitch Raemsch

From: BURT on
On May 6, 4:23 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote:
> On 5/6/2010 4:32 PM, BURT wrote:
>
> > On May 6, 1:39 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com>  wrote:
> >> On 5/6/2010 2:54 PM, PD wrote:
> >> He's never done otherwise. We can readily see how far he's gotten
> >> in physics and in life.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > The only way to win is not to play the game.
>
> "Not playing the game" precludes winning.

You're the looser. I don't play the game.

>
> > Black hole theory is wrong.
>
> At the limits, every model begins to go wrong.

My point is I know how to correct it. That is what is important.

Mitch Raemsch
From: PD on
On May 10, 4:06 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On May 6, 4:23 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote:
>
> > On 5/6/2010 4:32 PM, BURT wrote:
>
> > > On May 6, 1:39 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com>  wrote:
> > >> On 5/6/2010 2:54 PM, PD wrote:
> > >> He's never done otherwise. We can readily see how far he's gotten
> > >> in physics and in life.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > The only way to win is not to play the game.
>
> > "Not playing the game" precludes winning.
>
> You're the looser. I don't play the game.
>
>
>
> > > Black hole theory is wrong.
>
> > At the limits, every model begins to go wrong.
>
> My point is I know how to correct it. That is what is important.

No you don't. All you've done is whine that it is wrong. You don't
have a better theory. When you do, go ahead and publish it. By the
way, your name hasn't shown up yet on the Nobel site.
From: BURT on
On May 10, 2:46 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 10, 4:06 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 6, 4:23 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote:
>
> > > On 5/6/2010 4:32 PM, BURT wrote:
>
> > > > On May 6, 1:39 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com>  wrote:
> > > >> On 5/6/2010 2:54 PM, PD wrote:
> > > >> He's never done otherwise. We can readily see how far he's gotten
> > > >> in physics and in life.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > The only way to win is not to play the game.
>
> > > "Not playing the game" precludes winning.
>
> > You're the looser. I don't play the game.
>
> > > > Black hole theory is wrong.
>
> > > At the limits, every model begins to go wrong.
>
> > My point is I know how to correct it. That is what is important.
>
> No you don't. All you've done is whine that it is wrong. You don't
> have a better theory. When you do, go ahead and publish it. By the
> way, your name hasn't shown up yet on the Nobel site.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Please prove that it doesn't need a correction. You want to hold on to
the past and I am the opposite. I am a pioneer.

Mitch Raemsch
From: PD on
On May 10, 4:50 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On May 10, 2:46 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 10, 4:06 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On May 6, 4:23 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On 5/6/2010 4:32 PM, BURT wrote:
>
> > > > > On May 6, 1:39 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com>  wrote:
> > > > >> On 5/6/2010 2:54 PM, PD wrote:
> > > > >> He's never done otherwise. We can readily see how far he's gotten
> > > > >> in physics and in life.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > The only way to win is not to play the game.
>
> > > > "Not playing the game" precludes winning.
>
> > > You're the looser. I don't play the game.
>
> > > > > Black hole theory is wrong.
>
> > > > At the limits, every model begins to go wrong.
>
> > > My point is I know how to correct it. That is what is important.
>
> > No you don't. All you've done is whine that it is wrong. You don't
> > have a better theory. When you do, go ahead and publish it. By the
> > way, your name hasn't shown up yet on the Nobel site.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Please prove that it doesn't need a correction.

I didn't say it didn't need a correction. You said you had a
correction. Please provide it.

> You want to hold on to
> the past and I am the opposite. I am a pioneer.
>
> Mitch Raemsch