The psychology of the bully
in [Slackware]
|
Prev: where is zmodem?
Next: props to the slack developers
From: rm on 16 May 2007 03:21 Beej Jorgensen <beej(a)beej.us> wrote: > Floyd L. Davidson <floyd(a)apaflo.com> wrote: >>Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) floyd(a)apaflo.com > > Is this where you are? What do you do up there? He doesn't hunt polar bears, that's for sure. cordially, as always, rm
From: rm on 16 May 2007 03:27 Floyd L. Davidson <floyd(a)apaflo.com> wrote: > Beej Jorgensen <beej(a)beej.us> wrote: >>Floyd L. Davidson <floyd(a)apaflo.com> wrote: >>Is this where you are? What do you do up there? > Mostly these days I relax, eat, take another nap, and > start the cycle again! Thank God for satellite dishes, eh? > I'm retired. And why would you retire to Alaska? Good bear hunting? cordially, as always, rm
From: Floyd L. Davidson on 16 May 2007 05:15 rm(a)biteme.org wrote: >Floyd L. Davidson <floyd(a)apaflo.com> wrote: >> >> There are at least a dozen or so centerfire .22 >> varieties that are referred to as a ".22" *most* of the >> time. .22 Hornet, 22 WRF, .22 Reed Express, .22 >> Remington Jet, and .22 Jet are all examples. All of the > >None of these are referred to as a .22. You just identified them by >the names they are known by. Look, idiot... go to google and type in something like "22 rifle", or "22 centerfire" or "22 caliber" or whatever turns your crank, and what you'll learn is what everyone else already knows: all of those centerfire rifles are *commonly* referred to as 22's, for the simple reason that they are in fact 22 caliber weapons. >> others previously mentioned (.22-250, .223, etc) are *commonly* >> referred to as ".22s". > >No, they're not. Those shells are known by the names that you just >gave them. If you had a brain, you'd use it instead of making silly comments like that. The shells you think are the only one called a 22 also have specific names. Saying "a 22" can mean *any* of them. >> In addition, rimfire 22's come in Short, Long, and Longrifle, so >> even there claiming that ".22" refers only to the .22 Long Rifle >> is wrong. > >All .22s cartridges are rimfires. By definition. "Centerfire .22s For Big Game" http://www.rifleshootermag.com/ammunition/centerfire_22_biggame/ "... just like modern centerfire .22s ..." http://www.chuckhawks.com/history_rimfire_ammo.htm "And it shoots as well as some of my centerfire .22s ..." www.gunsandammomag.com/in_the_field/gungear_cci_22/ Obviously credible people do not agree with you. > You are not >describing the bullet, you are describing the cartridge. You are an idiot. The *bullet* is what is 22 caliber. The shell casing is not described by caliber. >Why don't you do us all a big favour and take a good old daisy bb >gun out there on your next polar bear hunt. You are an idiot. Why don't you *learn* something. -- Floyd L. Davidson <http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson> Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) floyd(a)apaflo.com
From: Floyd L. Davidson on 16 May 2007 05:27 rm(a)biteme.org wrote: >Floyd L. Davidson <floyd(a)apaflo.com> wrote: >> Beej Jorgensen <beej(a)beej.us> wrote: >>>Floyd L. Davidson <floyd(a)apaflo.com> wrote: > >>>Is this where you are? What do you do up there? > >> Mostly these days I relax, eat, take another nap, and >> start the cycle again! > >Thank God for satellite dishes, eh? Before retirement I was in charge of AT&T satellite earth stations on the North Slope. >> I'm retired. > >And why would you retire to Alaska? Some people are a lot smarter than you. > Good bear hunting? Must be, in your mind. -- Floyd L. Davidson <http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson> Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) floyd(a)apaflo.com
From: Two Ravens on 16 May 2007 06:28
Floyd L. Davidson wrote: rm(a)biteme.org wrote: >>All .22s cartridges are rimfires. By definition. Faced with the above Floyd, one just has to agree to differ! There is little point in doing anything else. Some think that the moon landings were faked. -- Two Ravens "...hit the squirrel..." |