From: paparios on
On 27 mar, 12:43, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote:
> On Mar 25, 4:30 pm, "papar...(a)gmail.com" <papar...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 25 mar, 16:10, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > On Mar 25, 12:27 pm, "papar...(a)gmail.com" <papar...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Dear Miguel Rios:  If you can, please find a link to the single photon
> > > experiment you describe.  I may be able to clarify the science truths
> > > (or falsehoods).  — NoEinstein —
>
> > I think you will be able to learn how a real experiment is carried
> > out. References are:
>
> > 1-Delayed “Choice” Quantum Eraser
> > Yoon-Ho Kim,* Rong Yu, Sergei P. Kulik, Yanhua Shih and Marlan O.
> > Scully
> > PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, VOLUME 84, 3 JANUARY 2000, NUMBER 1
>
> > 2-Experimental realization of Wheeler’s delayed-choice Gedanken
> > Experiment
> > V. Jacques1, E Wu1, F. Grosshans1, F. Treussart1, P. Grangier, A.
> > Aspect, and J.F. Roch
> > Science 315, 966 (2007).
>
> > Miguel Rios
>
> Dear Miguel Rios:  Please explain to me and the readers what you think
> isn't "real" about my Dropping Einstein Like a Stone Experiment.  Like
> I've told others, I don't read anything but the paraphrases of those
> who reply.  In rare cases I will read a link to an essay composed by
> the person replying.  You are sadly mistaken if you think "the words
> of others" gives you credibility.  — NoEinstein —
>
> Dropping Einstein Like a Stonehttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/989e1...

I think I have not said anything regarding your "Dropping Einstein
Like a Stone Experiment". Others have discussed this with you
elsewhere and I do not want to waste more of my time with that.

In fact I notice that you did ask me for references and, then, when I
provided them, you write you rarely read things like papers. That is
amazing.

Anyway, what I wrote refers to the fact that the experimental
realization of Wheeler’s delayed-choice Gedanken Experiment, was
indeed done by using real instrumentation (like photon sources, beam
splitters, detectors, etc.) in a real laboratory and, so, it gives a
far more stronger support to Quantum Mechanics.

Now you also wrote "I may be able to clarify the science truths (or
falsehoods)".
We are waiting for that to happen.

Miguel Rios
From: NoEinstein on
On Mar 25, 5:59 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
STOP copying and pasting your GARBAGE, mpc755. Google should ban you
for using up good computer storage, much like a virus that keeps
copying files! — NE —
>
> On Mar 25, 5:49 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Why try to understand absurd nonsense?
>
> Describing a wave as propagating the available paths and a particle as
> traveling a single path is absurd nonsense?
>
> If you were able to understand a wave propagates the available paths
> and a particle travels a single path then what is occurring in a
> 'delayed choice quantum eraser' experiment would be easily understood.
>
> For example, in the image on the right here:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delayed_choice_quantum_eraser#The_experi...
> There are waves propagating both the red and blue paths towards D0.
> One of the downgraded photon 'particles' is traveling either the red
> or blue path towards D0. The lens causes the waves to create
> interference which alters the direction the particle travels. One set
> of downgraded photons is creating one of the interference patterns at
> D0 and the other set of downgraded photons is creating the other.
>
> In the image on the right here:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delayed_choice_quantum_eraser#The_experi...
> When the downgraded photon pair are created, in order for there to be
> conservation of momentum, the original photons momentum is maintained.
> This means the downgraded photon pair have opposite angular momentums.
> We will describe one of the photons as being the 'up' photon and the
> other photon as being the 'down' photon. One of the downgraded photons
> travels either the red or blue path towards D0 and the other photon
> travels either the red or blue path towards the prism.
>
> There are physical waves in the aether propagating both the red and
> blue paths. The aether waves propagating towards D0 interact with the
> lens and create interference prior to reaching D0. The aether waves
> create interference which alters the direction the photon travels
> prior to reaching D0. There are actually two interference patterns
> being created at D0. One associated with the 'up' photons when they
> arrive at D0 and the other interference pattern associated with the
> 'down' photons when they arrive at D0.
>
> Both 'up' and 'down' photons are reflected by BSa and arrive at D3.
> Since there is a single path towards D3 there is nothing for the wave
> in the aether to interfere with and there is no interference pattern
> and since it is not determined if it is an 'up' or 'down' photon being
> detected at D3 there is no way to distinguish between the photons
> arriving at D0 which interference pattern each photon belongs to. The
> same for photons reflected by BSb and arrive at D4.
>
> Photons which pass through BSa and are reflected by BSc and arrive at
> D1 are either 'up' or 'down' photons but not both. If 'up' photons
> arrive at D1 then 'down' photons arrive at D2. The opposite occurs for
> photons which pass through BSb. Photons which pass through BSa and
> pass through BSb and arrive at D1 are all either 'up' or 'down'
> photons. If all 'up' photons arrive at D1 then all 'down' photons
> arrive at D2. Since the physical waves in the aether traveling both
> the red and blue paths are combined prior to D1 and D2 the aether
> waves create interference which alters the direction the photon
> travels. Since all 'up' photons arrive at one of the detectors and all
> 'down' photons arrive at the other an interference pattern is created
> which reflects back to the interference both sets of photons are
> creating at D0.
>
> Figures 3 and 4 here:http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/quant-ph/pdf/9903/9903047v1.pdf
> Show the interference pattern of the 'up' and 'down' photons. If you
> were to combine the two images and add the peaks together and add the
> valleys together you would have the interference pattern of the
> original photon. This is evidence the downgraded photon pair maintain
> the original photons momentum and have opposite angular momentums.
>
> Nothing is erased. There is no delayed choice. Physical waves in the
> aether are traveling both the red and blue paths and when the paths
> are combined the waves create interference which alters the direction
> the photon 'particle' travels.
>
> Experiments which are evidence of Aether Displacement:
>
> Experiment #1:
>
> Instead of having a single beam splitter BSc have two beam splitters
> BSca and BScb. Have the photons reflected by mirror Ma interact with
> BSca and have the photons reflected by mirror Mb interact with BScb.
> Do not combine the red and blue paths. Have additional detectors D1a,
> D2a, D1b, and D2b. Have the photons reflected by and propagate through
> BSca be detected at D1a and D2a. Have the photons reflected by and
> propagate through BScb be detected at D1b and D2b. If you compare the
> photons detected at D1a and D1b with the photons detected at D0, the
> corresponding photons detected at D0 will form an interference
> pattern. If you compare the photons detected at D2a and D2b with the
> photons detected at D0, the corresponding photons detected at D0 will
> form an interference pattern. What is occurring is all 'up' photons
> are being detected at one pair of detectors, for example D1a and D1b,
> and all 'down' photons are being detected at the other pair of
> detectors, for example D2a and D2b. Interference patterns do not even
> need to be created in order to 'go back' and determine the
> interference patterns created at D0.
>
> Experiment #2:
>
> Alter the experiment. When the downgraded photon pair are created,
> have each photon interact with its own double slit apparatus. Have
> detectors at one of the exits for each double slit apparatus. When a
> photon is detected at one of the exits, in AD, the photon's aether
> wave still exists and is propagating along the path exiting the other
> slit. When a photon is not detected at one of the exits, the photon
> 'particle' along with its associated aether wave exits the other slit.
> Combine the path the aether wave the detected photon is propagating
> along with the path of the other photon and its associated aether
> wave. An interference pattern will still be created. This shows the
> aether wave of a detected photon still exists and is able to create
> interference with the aether wave of another photon, altering the
> direction the photon 'particle' travels.
>
> Your inability to physically explain the following is evidence you
> feign hypothesis:
>
> - The future determining the past
> - Virtual particles which exist out of nothing
> - Conservation of momentum does not apply to a downgraded photon pair
> - A C-60 molecule can enter, travel through, and exit multiple slits
>   simultaneously without requiring energy, releasing energy, or having
>   a change in momentum.
> - Matter causes physical space to be 'unflat' but not move
>
> The following are the most correct physical explanations to date:
>
> - A C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit while the associate
>   aether displacement wave enters and exits available slits
> - The aether displaced by the matter which are the plates extends
>   past the other plate. The pressure exerted by the aether displaced
>   by the plates forces the plates together
> - Conservation of momentum does apply to a downgraded photon pair.
>   When a photon is detected its wave collapses which determines its
>   spin. In order for the original photons momentum to be conserved,
>   the downgraded photon pair have opposite angular momentums.
> - A C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit while the associate
>   aether displacement wave enters and exits available slits
> - Physical space is displaced by matter. Aether is displaced by
>   matter.

From: mpc755 on
On Mar 27, 1:16 pm, "papar...(a)gmail.com" <papar...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 27 mar, 12:43, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Mar 25, 4:30 pm, "papar...(a)gmail.com" <papar...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On 25 mar, 16:10, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > On Mar 25, 12:27 pm, "papar...(a)gmail.com" <papar...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Dear Miguel Rios:  If you can, please find a link to the single photon
> > > > experiment you describe.  I may be able to clarify the science truths
> > > > (or falsehoods).  — NoEinstein —
>
> > > I think you will be able to learn how a real experiment is carried
> > > out. References are:
>
> > > 1-Delayed “Choice” Quantum Eraser
> > > Yoon-Ho Kim,* Rong Yu, Sergei P. Kulik, Yanhua Shih and Marlan O.
> > > Scully
> > > PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, VOLUME 84, 3 JANUARY 2000, NUMBER 1
>
> > > 2-Experimental realization of Wheeler’s delayed-choice Gedanken
> > > Experiment
> > > V. Jacques1, E Wu1, F. Grosshans1, F. Treussart1, P. Grangier, A.
> > > Aspect, and J.F. Roch
> > > Science 315, 966 (2007).
>
> > > Miguel Rios
>
> > Dear Miguel Rios:  Please explain to me and the readers what you think
> > isn't "real" about my Dropping Einstein Like a Stone Experiment.  Like
> > I've told others, I don't read anything but the paraphrases of those
> > who reply.  In rare cases I will read a link to an essay composed by
> > the person replying.  You are sadly mistaken if you think "the words
> > of others" gives you credibility.  — NoEinstein —
>
> > Dropping Einstein Like a Stonehttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/989e1...
>
> I think I have not said anything regarding your "Dropping Einstein
> Like a Stone Experiment". Others have discussed this with you
> elsewhere and I do not want to waste more of my time with that.
>
> In fact I notice that you did ask me for references and, then, when I
> provided them, you write you rarely read things like papers. That is
> amazing.
>
> Anyway, what I wrote refers to the fact that the experimental
> realization of Wheeler’s delayed-choice Gedanken Experiment, was
> indeed done by using real instrumentation (like photon sources, beam
> splitters, detectors, etc.) in a real laboratory and, so, it gives a
> far more stronger support to Quantum Mechanics.
>

The following explains what is occurring in nature in the
'experimental realization of Wheeler's delayed-choice Gedanken
Experiment'.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_de_Broglie

"This research culminated in the de Broglie hypothesis stating that
any moving particle or object had an associated wave."

'Interpretation of quantum mechanics
by the double solution theory
Louis de BROGLIE'
http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf

"I called this relation, which determines the particle's motion in the
wave, "the guidance formula". It may easily be generalized to the case
of an external field acting on the particle."

"This result may be interpreted by noticing that, in the present
theory, the particle is defined as a very small region of the wave
where the amplitude is very large, and it therefore seems quite
natural that the defined by ai exp(i:Ái=~) with ai and Ái real.
internal motion rythm of the particle should always be the same as
that of the wave at the point where the particle is located."

de Broglie's definition of wave-particle duality is of a physical wave
and a physical particle. The particle occupies a very small region of
the wave.

In AD, the external field is the aether. In a double slit experiment
the particle occupies a very small region of the wave and enters and
exits a single slit. The wave enters and exits the available slits.

For example, in the image on the right here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delayed_choice_quantum_eraser#The_experiment
There are waves propagating both the red and blue paths towards D0.
One of the downgraded photon 'particles' is traveling either the red
or blue path towards D0. The lens causes the waves to create
interference which alters the direction the particle travels. One set
of downgraded photons is creating one of the interference patterns at
D0 and the other set of downgraded photons is creating the other.

It's all very easy to understand once you realize 'delayed-choice',
'quantum eraser', and the future determining the past is simply
misinterpreting what is occurring in nature.

In the image on the right here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delayed_choice_quantum_eraser#The_experiment
When the downgraded photon pair are created, in order for there to be
conservation of momentum, the original photons momentum is maintained.
This means the downgraded photon pair have opposite angular momentums.
We will describe one of the photons as being the 'up' photon and the
other photon as being the 'down' photon. One of the downgraded photons
travels either the red or blue path towards D0 and the other photon
travels either the red or blue path towards the prism.

There are physical waves in the aether propagating both the red and
blue paths. The aether waves propagating towards D0 interact with the
lens and create interference prior to reaching D0. The aether waves
create interference which alters the direction the photon travels
prior to reaching D0. There are actually two interference patterns
being created at D0. One associated with the 'up' photons when they
arrive at D0 and the other interference pattern associated with the
'down' photons when they arrive at D0.

Both 'up' and 'down' photons are reflected by BSa and arrive at D3.
Since there is a single path towards D3 there is nothing for the wave
in the aether to interfere with and there is no interference pattern
and since it is not determined if it is an 'up' or 'down' photon being
detected at D3 there is no way to distinguish between the photons
arriving at D0 which interference pattern each photon belongs to. The
same for photons reflected by BSb and arrive at D4.

Photons which pass through BSa and are reflected by BSc and arrive at
D1 are either 'up' or 'down' photons but not both. If 'up' photons
arrive at D1 then 'down' photons arrive at D2. The opposite occurs for
photons which pass through BSb. Photons which pass through BSa and
pass through BSb and arrive at D1 are all either 'up' or 'down'
photons. If all 'up' photons arrive at D1 then all 'down' photons
arrive at D2. Since the physical waves in the aether traveling both
the red and blue paths are combined prior to D1 and D2 the aether
waves create interference which alters the direction the photon
travels. Since all 'up' photons arrive at one of the detectors and all
'down' photons arrive at the other an interference pattern is created
which reflects back to the interference both sets of photons are
creating at D0.

Figures 3 and 4 here:
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/quant-ph/pdf/9903/9903047v1.pdf
Show the interference pattern of the 'up' and 'down' photons. If you
were to combine the two images and add the peaks together and add the
valleys together you would have the interference pattern of the
original photon. This is evidence the downgraded photon pair maintain
the original photons momentum and have opposite angular momentums.

Nothing is erased. There is no delayed choice. Physical waves in the
aether are traveling both the red and blue paths and when the paths
are combined the waves create interference which alters the direction
the photon 'particle' travels.

Experiments which are evidence of Aether Displacement:

Experiment #1:

Instead of having a single beam splitter BSc have two beam splitters
BSca and BScb. Have the photons reflected by mirror Ma interact with
BSca and have the photons reflected by mirror Mb interact with BScb.
Do not combine the red and blue paths. Have additional detectors D1a,
D2a, D1b, and D2b. Have the photons reflected by and propagate through
BSca be detected at D1a and D2a. Have the photons reflected by and
propagate through BScb be detected at D1b and D2b. If you compare the
photons detected at D1a and D1b with the photons detected at D0, the
corresponding photons detected at D0 will form an interference
pattern. If you compare the photons detected at D2a and D2b with the
photons detected at D0, the corresponding photons detected at D0 will
form an interference pattern. What is occurring is all 'up' photons
are being detected at one pair of detectors, for example D1a and D1b,
and all 'down' photons are being detected at the other pair of
detectors, for example D2a and D2b. Interference patterns do not even
need to be created in order to 'go back' and determine the
interference patterns created at D0.

Experiment #2:

Alter the experiment. When the downgraded photon pair are created,
have each photon interact with its own double slit apparatus. Have
detectors at one of the exits for each double slit apparatus. When a
photon is detected at one of the exits, in AD, the photon's aether
wave still exists and is propagating along the path exiting the other
slit. When a photon is not detected at one of the exits, the photon
'particle' along with its associated aether wave exits the other slit.
Combine the path the aether wave the detected photon is propagating
along with the path of the other photon and its associated aether
wave. An interference pattern will still be created. This shows the
aether wave of a detected photon still exists and is able to create
interference with the aether wave of another photon, altering the
direction the photon 'particle' travels.

Your inability to physically explain the following is evidence you
feign hypothesis:

- The future determining the past
- Virtual particles which exist out of nothing
- Conservation of momentum does not apply to a downgraded photon pair
- A C-60 molecule can enter, travel through, and exit multiple slits
simultaneously without requiring energy, releasing energy, or having
a change in momentum.
- Matter causes physical space to be 'unflat' but not move

The following are the most correct physical explanations to date:

- A C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit while the associate
aether displacement wave enters and exits available slits
- The aether displaced by the matter which are the plates extends
past the other plate. The pressure exerted by the aether displaced
by the plates forces the plates together
- Conservation of momentum does apply to a downgraded photon pair.
When a photon is detected its wave collapses which determines its
spin. In order for the original photons momentum to be conserved,
the downgraded photon pair have opposite angular momentums.
- A C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit while the associate
aether displacement wave enters and exits available slits
- Physical space is displaced by matter. Aether is displaced by
matter.
From: NoEinstein on
On Mar 25, 6:05 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 25, 4:59 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mar 25, 5:49 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Why try to understand absurd nonsense?
>
> > Describing a wave as propagating the available paths and a particle as
> > traveling a single path is absurd nonsense?
>
> Yup. You got a model of these that calculates quantitatively
> experimental measurements accurately?

Don't encourage the guy, PD. Asking him a question is as pointless as
getting you to answer one! — NE —
From: mpc755 on
On Mar 27, 1:18 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote:
> On Mar 25, 5:59 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> STOP copying and pasting your GARBAGE, mpc755.  Google should ban you
> for using up good computer storage, much like a virus that keeps
> copying files!  — NE —
>

The following explains what is occurring in nature in the
'experimental realization of Wheeler's delayed-choice Gedanken
Experiment'.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_de_Broglie

"This research culminated in the de Broglie hypothesis stating that
any moving particle or object had an associated wave."

'Interpretation of quantum mechanics
by the double solution theory
Louis de BROGLIE'
http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf

"I called this relation, which determines the particle's motion in the
wave, "the guidance formula". It may easily be generalized to the case
of an external field acting on the particle."

"This result may be interpreted by noticing that, in the present
theory, the particle is defined as a very small region of the wave
where the amplitude is very large, and it therefore seems quite
natural that the internal motion rythm of the particle should always
be the same as that of the wave at the point where the particle is
located."

de Broglie's definition of wave-particle duality is of a physical wave
and a physical particle. The particle occupies a very small region of
the wave.

In AD, the external field is the aether. In a double slit experiment
the particle occupies a very small region of the wave and enters and
exits a single slit. The wave enters and exits the available slits.

For example, in the image on the right here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delayed_choice_quantum_eraser#The_experiment
There are waves propagating both the red and blue paths towards D0.
One of the downgraded photon 'particles' is traveling either the red
or blue path towards D0. The lens causes the waves to create
interference which alters the direction the particle travels. One set
of downgraded photons is creating one of the interference patterns at
D0 and the other set of downgraded photons is creating the other.

It's all very easy to understand once you realize 'delayed-choice',
'quantum eraser', and the future determining the past is simply
misinterpreting what is occurring in nature.

In the image on the right here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delayed_choice_quantum_eraser#The_experiment
When the downgraded photon pair are created, in order for there to be
conservation of momentum, the original photons momentum is maintained.
This means the downgraded photon pair have opposite angular momentums.
We will describe one of the photons as being the 'up' photon and the
other photon as being the 'down' photon. One of the downgraded photons
travels either the red or blue path towards D0 and the other photon
travels either the red or blue path towards the prism.

There are physical waves in the aether propagating both the red and
blue paths. The aether waves propagating towards D0 interact with the
lens and create interference prior to reaching D0. The aether waves
create interference which alters the direction the photon travels
prior to reaching D0. There are actually two interference patterns
being created at D0. One associated with the 'up' photons when they
arrive at D0 and the other interference pattern associated with the
'down' photons when they arrive at D0.

Both 'up' and 'down' photons are reflected by BSa and arrive at D3.
Since there is a single path towards D3 there is nothing for the wave
in the aether to interfere with and there is no interference pattern
and since it is not determined if it is an 'up' or 'down' photon being
detected at D3 there is no way to distinguish between the photons
arriving at D0 which interference pattern each photon belongs to. The
same for photons reflected by BSb and arrive at D4.

Photons which pass through BSa and are reflected by BSc and arrive at
D1 are either 'up' or 'down' photons but not both. If 'up' photons
arrive at D1 then 'down' photons arrive at D2. The opposite occurs for
photons which pass through BSb. Photons which pass through BSa and
pass through BSb and arrive at D1 are all either 'up' or 'down'
photons. If all 'up' photons arrive at D1 then all 'down' photons
arrive at D2. Since the physical waves in the aether traveling both
the red and blue paths are combined prior to D1 and D2 the aether
waves create interference which alters the direction the photon
travels. Since all 'up' photons arrive at one of the detectors and all
'down' photons arrive at the other an interference pattern is created
which reflects back to the interference both sets of photons are
creating at D0.

Figures 3 and 4 here:
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/quant-ph/pdf/9903/9903047v1.pdf
Show the interference pattern of the 'up' and 'down' photons. If you
were to combine the two images and add the peaks together and add the
valleys together you would have the interference pattern of the
original photon. This is evidence the downgraded photon pair maintain
the original photons momentum and have opposite angular momentums.

Nothing is erased. There is no delayed choice. Physical waves in the
aether are traveling both the red and blue paths and when the paths
are combined the waves create interference which alters the direction
the photon 'particle' travels.

Experiments which are evidence of Aether Displacement:

Experiment #1:

Instead of having a single beam splitter BSc have two beam splitters
BSca and BScb. Have the photons reflected by mirror Ma interact with
BSca and have the photons reflected by mirror Mb interact with BScb.
Do not combine the red and blue paths. Have additional detectors D1a,
D2a, D1b, and D2b. Have the photons reflected by and propagate through
BSca be detected at D1a and D2a. Have the photons reflected by and
propagate through BScb be detected at D1b and D2b. If you compare the
photons detected at D1a and D1b with the photons detected at D0, the
corresponding photons detected at D0 will form an interference
pattern. If you compare the photons detected at D2a and D2b with the
photons detected at D0, the corresponding photons detected at D0 will
form an interference pattern. What is occurring is all 'up' photons
are being detected at one pair of detectors, for example D1a and D1b,
and all 'down' photons are being detected at the other pair of
detectors, for example D2a and D2b. Interference patterns do not even
need to be created in order to 'go back' and determine the
interference patterns created at D0.

Experiment #2:

Alter the experiment. When the downgraded photon pair are created,
have each photon interact with its own double slit apparatus. Have
detectors at one of the exits for each double slit apparatus. When a
photon is detected at one of the exits, in AD, the photon's aether
wave still exists and is propagating along the path exiting the other
slit. When a photon is not detected at one of the exits, the photon
'particle' along with its associated aether wave exits the other slit.
Combine the path the aether wave the detected photon is propagating
along with the path of the other photon and its associated aether
wave. An interference pattern will still be created. This shows the
aether wave of a detected photon still exists and is able to create
interference with the aether wave of another photon, altering the
direction the photon 'particle' travels.

Your inability to physically explain the following is evidence you
feign hypothesis:

- The future determining the past
- Virtual particles which exist out of nothing
- Conservation of momentum does not apply to a downgraded photon pair
- A C-60 molecule can enter, travel through, and exit multiple slits
simultaneously without requiring energy, releasing energy, or having
a change in momentum.
- Matter causes physical space to be 'unflat' but not move

The following are the most correct physical explanations to date:

- A C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit while the associate
aether displacement wave enters and exits available slits
- The aether displaced by the matter which are the plates extends
past the other plate. The pressure exerted by the aether displaced
by the plates forces the plates together
- Conservation of momentum does apply to a downgraded photon pair.
When a photon is detected its wave collapses which determines its
spin. In order for the original photons momentum to be conserved,
the downgraded photon pair have opposite angular momentums.
- A C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit while the associate
aether displacement wave enters and exits available slits
- Physical space is displaced by matter. Aether is displaced by
matter.