There is no “pull” of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!
in [Physics]
|
From: NoEinstein on 5 Mar 2010 06:02 On Mar 4, 11:54 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > Dear spudnik: Go away! Gravity is too important a subject for you to be causing your STATIC! NE > > well, but, so, What? > > you going to live in the virtual ghetto > for the rest of the Singularity? > > > Matter is compressed mather and aether is uncompressed mather. > > thus: > kind of a nice idea, that Moon might > be just a bit holllow (or riddled with subsurface caves). > > however, the main confomations of mare & highland appear > to be simple plate tectonics, albeit mostly finished > (the last gasp would be very "nonlinear," > thus giving rise to explosive craters, volcanically; > as opposed to the mainstream impactoids theory -- > the former one not being mine, either .-) > > thus: > has anyone stated what Thermite (tm) is made of, and > what its primary use is? > > thus: > perhaps, the answer lays in front of you; > how well do you see, underwater? > > thus: > the funny thing about this thread, is that > There Are No Electrons -- oops; > that was a pedagogical treatise on "basic electronics," > I suppose, using hydraulics analogies etc. > > I meant, there clearly are no photons, > in the same way that there are no phonons, > except in a delimited "quantization" or math > (the photoelctrical instrumentation e.g.) > > "Death to the lightcone; long-live the lightcone!" > > thus quoth: > The negative AO has brought warmer temperatures to the arctic but has > also lead to wind patterns that tend to keep the ice intact. If the > AO stays negative then this year's September ice coverage minimum > should be fairly normal. It was wind patterns, and not temperature, > that lead to the record arctic ice lost in 2007. > http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/index.html > > thus: > read Alfven. in the meantime, > positrons spiral in the opposite bubble-tracks > to electrons, as has been known for decades. > what the Hell; > do what ever you were going to do with your typewriter, > anyway. if we can get a Psalm per century out > of you two, we'll win the Lotto! > > > How would you identify an individual positron if it was emited? > > thus: > wow; what Al and PD said about the pointiness of electrons, > I'd never read of, before; prove them wrong! > > --Light: A History!http://wlym.com
From: PD on 5 Mar 2010 10:51 On Mar 5, 4:23 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Mar 2, 6:04 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear mpc755: The 'push back'-in-your-seat while the plane is taking > off and climbing to cruising altitude is due to the INERTIA of your > body resisting being made to go faster. There is ether flow causing > that 'push back'. The reason (observed) UFOs can change direction so > quickly without having the 'g' forces kill the occupants is because > UFOs control the ether envelope that must be there in order for there > to be any 'g' forces at all. > > When airliners are in level flight, and traveling at cruising speed, > you are still being pushed back in your seat, slightly, by the ether > flowing through the plane. You will notice that you seem to be > walking up hill when going to the little plumbing room. Oh dear. > And walking > downhill going back to your seat. Clocks on the space shuttle slow > down in proportion to the total length of the flight. If acceleration > was the only cause of the slowing, space flights of any length would > cause identical slowing of the clocks, since the acceleration phases > of each would be identical. NoEinstein > > > > > On Mar 2, 5:58 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > On Feb 26, 8:31 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > On Feb 26, 12:15 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > Matter has ether flowing within it. Ether is the mother > > > > > of creation, not matter. > > > > > There is no ether other than matter itself. In harmony with my > > > > belief that important words should be defiend the first time they are > > > > used in written form, I defined ether as being the continuity aspect > > > > of a material field, whether or not particles are part of it. > > > > > Because matter cannot be created or destroyed, it always existed and > > > > so did the five other basic items of which everything in the universe > > > > is composed. As to 'creation", I long ago realized that Evolution is > > > > God's method of creating what now exists. > > > > > glird > > > > Dear glird: Every time you ride on a jet airliner you get pushed back > > > in your seat by the ether that is flowing through the plane, front to > > > back. > > > While accelerating. Not during constant momentum. > > > > That same flowing ether will slow down all mechanical, atomic, > > > and biological processes. Instead of making up your own ideas about > > > physics, realize that in nearly four years that I have been using > > > sci.physics, not a SINGLE person has shown that my NEW science is in > > > any way wrong. You've got a very long way to go before you can match > > > what I have accomplished. NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > >
From: PD on 5 Mar 2010 10:52 On Mar 5, 4:27 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Mar 3, 11:08 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 2, 4:58 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > On Feb 26, 8:31 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > On Feb 26, 12:15 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > Matter has ether flowing within it. Ether is the mother > > > > > of creation, not matter. > > > > > There is no ether other than matter itself. In harmony with my > > > > belief that important words should be defiend the first time they are > > > > used in written form, I defined ether as being the continuity aspect > > > > of a material field, whether or not particles are part of it. > > > > > Because matter cannot be created or destroyed, it always existed and > > > > so did the five other basic items of which everything in the universe > > > > is composed. As to 'creation", I long ago realized that Evolution is > > > > God's method of creating what now exists. > > > > > glird > > > > Dear glird: Every time you ride on a jet airliner you get pushed back > > > in your seat by the ether that is flowing through the plane, front to > > > back. > > > Really? Then why do people sleep on airplanes, without their hair > > streaming backwards as though they were in a breeze? > > > > That same flowing ether will slow down all mechanical, atomic, > > > and biological processes. Instead of making up your own ideas about > > > physics, realize that in nearly four years that I have been using > > > sci.physics, not a SINGLE person has shown that my NEW science is in > > > any way wrong. You've got a very long way to go before you can match > > > what I have accomplished. NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Ether flow is by degrees. And it isn't > something going around the body, but through the body and the hair. > Both the body and the hair get pushed proportionately. NoEinstein Right, same with wind. Wind pushes the body and the hair. But the hair is lighter so it responds to the wind more easily. So tell me again why the hair does not blow backwards in the aether breeze you say is there?
From: PD on 5 Mar 2010 10:53 On Mar 5, 4:39 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Mar 3, 11:55 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear mpc755: You should make your own '+new post' if you wish to > expound new notions about science. You are clearly off the subject. > NoEinstein He does, all the time. You can't find them? Are you completely incompetent with newsgroups? > > > > > On Mar 3, 11:14 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mar 3, 11:08 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 2, 4:58 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > On Feb 26, 8:31 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Feb 26, 12:15 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > Matter has ether flowing within it. Ether is the mother > > > > > > > of creation, not matter. > > > > > > > There is no ether other than matter itself. In harmony with my > > > > > > belief that important words should be defiend the first time they are > > > > > > used in written form, I defined ether as being the continuity aspect > > > > > > of a material field, whether or not particles are part of it. > > > > > > > Because matter cannot be created or destroyed, it always existed and > > > > > > so did the five other basic items of which everything in the universe > > > > > > is composed. As to 'creation", I long ago realized that Evolution is > > > > > > God's method of creating what now exists. > > > > > > > glird > > > > > > Dear glird: Every time you ride on a jet airliner you get pushed back > > > > > in your seat by the ether that is flowing through the plane, front to > > > > > back. > > > > > Really? Then why do people sleep on airplanes, without their hair > > > > streaming backwards as though they were in a breeze? > > > > Because they are moving with constant momentum and the aether applies > > > equal pressure to every part of the matter. The pressure the aether > > > exerts on and throughout a moving airplane is greater than an object > > > at the same altitude which would be considered to be at rest with > > > respect to the aether but the pressure associated with the aether > > > exerted on each and every nuclei in the moving plane is equal on every > > > part of the nuclei. > > > > It is during acceleration that the pressure associated with the aether > > > is not equal on each and every part of the nuclei and that is why you > > > are pushed back in you chair on take off and move forward during > > > landings. Each and every nuclei which is the human body is interacting > > > with the aether. > > >http://www.physorg.com/news185201084.html > > > "Superfluidity and superconductivity cause particles to move without > > friction. Koos Gubbels investigated under what conditions such > > particles keep moving endlessly without losing energy, like a swimmer > > who takes one mighty stroke and then keeps gliding forever along the > > swimming pool." > > > Each nuclei is the swimmer. > > > 'On the super-fluid property of the relativistic physical vacuum > > medium and the inertial motion of particles'http://arxiv.org/ftp/gr-qc/papers/0701/0701155.pdf > > > "a particle moving through the vacuum medium at a speed less than the > > speed of light in vacuum, though interacting with the vacuum medium, > > never feels friction force and thus undergoes a frictionless and > > inertial motion." > > > "The property of the physical vacuum of our universe is a central > > issue in modern particle physics and cosmology. In this paper we shall > > show that the relativistic physical vacuum medium as a ubiquitous back > > ground field is a super fluid medium." > > > If the particle were accelerating through the super fluid medium then > > even though the interaction is frictionless there is still more > > pressure exerted on the front of the particle (in the direction of > > travel) then on the back of the particle. > > > Each nuclei is the particle moving through the aether, which in this > > instance is analogous to a super fluid medium. > > > If the nuclei are accelerating through the aether then even though the > > interaction is frictionless there is still more pressure exerted on > > the front of the nuclei (in the direction of travel) then on the back > > of the nuclei. > > > The opposite occurs during deceleration.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > >
From: spudnik on 5 Mar 2010 11:39
when I "go away," I'll just tear myself away from uselessnet, altogether; if I's a hacker, I'd blow you out, with me! > > read Alfven. in the meantime, > > positrons spiral in the opposite bubble-tracks > > to electrons, as has been known for decades. > > > How would you identify an individual positron if it was emited? > > wow; what Al and PD said about the pointiness of electrons, > > I'd never read of, before; prove them wrong! thus: didn't finish, but it began rather nicely. also, see about Weber's "magnetic molecule" as http://21stcenturysciencetech.com -- or knot. > http://www.amperefitz.com/lawrm.htm thus: the speed of light depends upon the density of the medium, viz the index of refraction, cf. the brachistochrone (tautochrone) of Bernoulli and Liebniz, the cannonical problem that defined "the" caclulus. the speed of sound depends upon the density of the medium; about 600mph at sea-level; clearly, that is an upper bound on the speed of wind at sea-level! --Light: A History! http://wlym.com |