There is no “pull” of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!
in [Physics]
|
From: spudnik on 4 Mar 2010 23:54 well, but, so, What? you going to live in the virtual ghetto for the rest of the Singularity? > Matter is compressed mather and aether is uncompressed mather. thus: kind of a nice idea, that Moon might be just a bit holllow (or riddled with subsurface caves). however, the main confomations of mare & highland appear to be simple plate tectonics, albeit mostly finished (the last gasp would be very "nonlinear," thus giving rise to explosive craters, volcanically; as opposed to the mainstream impactoids theory -- the former one not being mine, either .-) thus: has anyone stated what Thermite (tm) is made of, and what its primary use is? thus: perhaps, the answer lays in front of you; how well do you see, underwater? thus: the funny thing about this thread, is that There Are No Electrons -- oops; that was a pedagogical treatise on "basic electronics," I suppose, using hydraulics analogies etc. I meant, there clearly are no photons, in the same way that there are no phonons, except in a delimited "quantization" or math (the photoelctrical instrumentation e.g.) "Death to the lightcone; long-live the lightcone!" thus quoth: The negative AO has brought warmer temperatures to the arctic but has also lead to wind patterns that tend to keep the ice intact. If the AO stays negative then this year's September ice coverage minimum should be fairly normal. It was wind patterns, and not temperature, that lead to the record arctic ice lost in 2007. http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/index.html thus: read Alfven. in the meantime, positrons spiral in the opposite bubble-tracks to electrons, as has been known for decades. what the Hell; do what ever you were going to do with your typewriter, anyway. if we can get a Psalm per century out of you two, we'll win the Lotto! > How would you identify an individual positron if it was emited? thus: wow; what Al and PD said about the pointiness of electrons, I'd never read of, before; prove them wrong! --Light: A History! http://wlym.com
From: NoEinstein on 5 Mar 2010 05:07 On Mar 2, 6:03 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Dear mpc755: Your "mather" is both a misspelling and a misunderstanding of matter. Tell me, guy: Why is it necessary for there to be THREE states of the Universe when only TWO are required? Ether doesn't FILL space; it flows through it like wind in weather systems on Earth. Ether is NOT a medium required for the propagation of light 'waves' (sic). I know that to be true because light quanta, or photons, can travel through the Swiss Cheese voids between galaxies. Additionally, there is no wavelike motion of the ether associated with 'gravity', either. Since ether is the energy building block of everything else, I realized that ether must be capable of TANGLING into energy densities much greater than in the ether at large. Because ether can flow, there must be a meniscus on the edge of the Universe, otherwise the ether would keep flowing outward until the density gets too low to form any matter. Having the Universe be "infinite" doesn't compute never has and never will. That leaves open the possibility that there are other universes out there. The main 'creation' question that is unanswered is: How did the ether energy get there? Proposing that an omnipotent God put the energy there leaves this question: Who created God? Ultimately, the understanding of the Universe won't require faith. It's fun to know that there are still things to be learned! NoEinstein > > On Mar 2, 5:06 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > On Feb 26, 12:23 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:> > > > Dear mpc755: When you touch an index finger to the back of the > > opposite hand, at atomic scales, the IOTAs (smallest energy units of > > the ether), which are polar, oppose the polar IOTAs of the opposite > > hand. Thought of that way, there is no "matter" in the Universe, only > > tangles of IOTAs and free-flowing ether in the spaces between. So, it > > would be more proper to say that "matter" (the energy tangles) is a > > state of the ether, not the other way around. NoEinstein > > This is the opposite definition glird proposes. glird definition of > aether is "aether-is-the- > continuous-form-of-the-material-outside-of-and-surrounding-atomic- > nuclei IS matter-is-the-compressible-substance-that-fills-space". > > This is why I am naming the material which both the aether and matter > consist of mather. This avoids redefining already existing and > conceptualized terms. > > I think 'we' all have the same basic concept of what aether is. I > think 'we' all have the same basic concept of what matter is. Instead > of trying to modify the concept of aether to be a state of matter or > for matter to be a state of aether it is better if we define matter > and aether to both be states of mather. > > We can then agree mather has mass. Meaning both matter and aether have > mass. Meaning the aether is displaced by matter. Meaning the aether > applies pressure towards the matter doing the displacing. > > Meaning the pressure associated with the aether displaced by massive > objects is gravity.
From: NoEinstein on 5 Mar 2010 05:23 On Mar 2, 6:04 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Dear mpc755: The 'push back'-in-your-seat while the plane is taking off and climbing to cruising altitude is due to the INERTIA of your body resisting being made to go faster. There is ether flow causing that 'push back'. The reason (observed) UFOs can change direction so quickly without having the 'g' forces kill the occupants is because UFOs control the ether envelope that must be there in order for there to be any 'g' forces at all. When airliners are in level flight, and traveling at cruising speed, you are still being pushed back in your seat, slightly, by the ether flowing through the plane. You will notice that you seem to be walking up hill when going to the little plumbing room. And walking downhill going back to your seat. Clocks on the space shuttle slow down in proportion to the total length of the flight. If acceleration was the only cause of the slowing, space flights of any length would cause identical slowing of the clocks, since the acceleration phases of each would be identical. NoEinstein > > On Mar 2, 5:58 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Feb 26, 8:31 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > On Feb 26, 12:15 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > Matter has ether flowing within it. Ether is the mother > > > > of creation, not matter. > > > > There is no ether other than matter itself. In harmony with my > > > belief that important words should be defiend the first time they are > > > used in written form, I defined ether as being the continuity aspect > > > of a material field, whether or not particles are part of it. > > > > Because matter cannot be created or destroyed, it always existed and > > > so did the five other basic items of which everything in the universe > > > is composed. As to 'creation", I long ago realized that Evolution is > > > God's method of creating what now exists. > > > > glird > > > Dear glird: Every time you ride on a jet airliner you get pushed back > > in your seat by the ether that is flowing through the plane, front to > > back. > > While accelerating. Not during constant momentum. > > > > > That same flowing ether will slow down all mechanical, atomic, > > and biological processes. Instead of making up your own ideas about > > physics, realize that in nearly four years that I have been using > > sci.physics, not a SINGLE person has shown that my NEW science is in > > any way wrong. You've got a very long way to go before you can match > > what I have accomplished. NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
From: NoEinstein on 5 Mar 2010 05:27 On Mar 3, 11:08 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 2, 4:58 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Feb 26, 8:31 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > On Feb 26, 12:15 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > Matter has ether flowing within it. Ether is the mother > > > > of creation, not matter. > > > > There is no ether other than matter itself. In harmony with my > > > belief that important words should be defiend the first time they are > > > used in written form, I defined ether as being the continuity aspect > > > of a material field, whether or not particles are part of it. > > > > Because matter cannot be created or destroyed, it always existed and > > > so did the five other basic items of which everything in the universe > > > is composed. As to 'creation", I long ago realized that Evolution is > > > God's method of creating what now exists. > > > > glird > > > Dear glird: Every time you ride on a jet airliner you get pushed back > > in your seat by the ether that is flowing through the plane, front to > > back. > > Really? Then why do people sleep on airplanes, without their hair > streaming backwards as though they were in a breeze? > > > > > That same flowing ether will slow down all mechanical, atomic, > > and biological processes. Instead of making up your own ideas about > > physics, realize that in nearly four years that I have been using > > sci.physics, not a SINGLE person has shown that my NEW science is in > > any way wrong. You've got a very long way to go before you can match > > what I have accomplished. NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Ether flow is by degrees. And it isn't something going around the body, but through the body and the hair. Both the body and the hair get pushed proportionately. NoEinstein
From: NoEinstein on 5 Mar 2010 05:32
On Mar 3, 11:14 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Dear mpc755: The flowing ether applies pressure in direct proportion to the specific gravity and porosity of the matternot equally. That is why 'gravity' (flowing ether) causes lead to weigh more than feathers. NoEinstein > > On Mar 3, 11:08 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mar 2, 4:58 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > On Feb 26, 8:31 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > On Feb 26, 12:15 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > Matter has ether flowing within it. Ether is the mother > > > > > of creation, not matter. > > > > > There is no ether other than matter itself. In harmony with my > > > > belief that important words should be defiend the first time they are > > > > used in written form, I defined ether as being the continuity aspect > > > > of a material field, whether or not particles are part of it. > > > > > Because matter cannot be created or destroyed, it always existed and > > > > so did the five other basic items of which everything in the universe > > > > is composed. As to 'creation", I long ago realized that Evolution is > > > > God's method of creating what now exists. > > > > > glird > > > > Dear glird: Every time you ride on a jet airliner you get pushed back > > > in your seat by the ether that is flowing through the plane, front to > > > back. > > > Really? Then why do people sleep on airplanes, without their hair > > streaming backwards as though they were in a breeze? > > Because they are moving with constant momentum and the aether applies > equal pressure to every part of the matter. The pressure the aether > exerts on and throughout a moving airplane is greater than an object > at the same altitude which would be considered to be at rest with > respect to the aether but the pressure associated with the aether > exerted on each and every nuclei in the moving plane is equal on every > part of the nuclei. > > It is during acceleration that the pressure associated with the aether > is not equal on each and every part of the nuclei and that is why you > are pushed back in you chair on take off and move forward during > landings. Each and every nuclei which is the human body is interacting > with the aether. > > > > > > That same flowing ether will slow down all mechanical, atomic, > > > and biological processes. Instead of making up your own ideas about > > > physics, realize that in nearly four years that I have been using > > > sci.physics, not a SINGLE person has shown that my NEW science is in > > > any way wrong. You've got a very long way to go before you can match > > > what I have accomplished. NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - |