Prev: Capacitor discharge probes
Next: makes no sense to me
From: Archimedes' Lever on 20 Jun 2010 22:40 On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 17:02:25 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman <bill.sloman(a)ieee.org> wrote: >The mil is still a standard unit of measurement in the US, whose >engineers failed to keep up with the rest of the world when it went >metric. Your scientists weren't as backward. We work in BOTH, idiot, and do so well. There is no need to jump into microns where mils or even mm works just fine. Paints, films, etc. can be described quite well with mils, and there is no need to replace single units with 63 additional divisions. Microns are for more precise industrial processes and systems, like sputtering, epitaxy, etc. So we DO use ALL of the world's quantification units, in EVERY realm of science. You are absolutely stupid to think otherwise. We just happen to have garnered a better sense of which to use where, and when, AND WHY. Only stubborn "ours is the right, only way" total dorks have issues. So get a clue, you total dork.
From: Archimedes' Lever on 20 Jun 2010 22:42 On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 17:02:25 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman <bill.sloman(a)ieee.org> wrote: >I'm happy to use any unit that works And happy to insult others that do as well, accusing them of not doing so, and lacking something you claim to have as a result. You could not be less civil for your stupid finger pointing masturbation. We don;t need it, SLOW-wanna-be-man.
From: Archimedes' Lever on 20 Jun 2010 22:43 On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 17:02:25 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman <bill.sloman(a)ieee.org> wrote: >I'm not so stupid as to expect other people to be able to rapidly >process idiosyncratic units. You obviously are. Now YOU should go back and read some of your own posts, you insulting twit.
From: Archimedes' Lever on 20 Jun 2010 22:48 On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 17:02:25 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman <bill.sloman(a)ieee.org> wrote: >- the engineers of God's Only Country didn't think that their tools >and products might be exported to other countries, And you are a US hating dumbfuck, just like Senile from BC is.
From: Archimedes' Lever on 20 Jun 2010 22:48
On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 17:02:25 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman <bill.sloman(a)ieee.org> wrote: >That was stupid, arrogant and expensive. It will >cost you a bundle to retool as the British did, some fifty years ago, >back when the tools were simpler and cheaper and somewhat thinner on >the ground. You have a HUGE bent perception of reality, as well as history. |