Prev: Capacitor discharge probes
Next: makes no sense to me
From: Bill Sloman on 21 Jun 2010 02:07 On Jun 21, 4:48 am, Archimedes' Lever <OneBigLe...(a)InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote: > On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 17:02:25 -0700 (PDT),Bill Sloman > > <bill.slo...(a)ieee.org> wrote: > >That was stupid, arrogant and expensive. It will > >cost you a bundle to retool as the British did, some fifty years ago, > >back when the tools were simpler and cheaper and somewhat thinner on > >the ground. > > You have a HUGE bent perception of reality, as well as history. Well, my perception of reality does seem to differ from yours or Jim Thompson's, but that doesn't necessarily make it "bent". Anybody who shared your delusions would definitely have a bent perception of reality, so your opinion of what constitutes a "bent" perception isn't either interesting or useful. -- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
From: Archimedes' Lever on 21 Jun 2010 02:41 On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 22:06:47 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman <bill.sloman(a)ieee.org> wrote: >You may not like my reading strategy, but it isn't in any sense >illogical. Bwuahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahhah!
From: Archimedes' Lever on 21 Jun 2010 02:42 On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 22:13:44 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman <bill.sloman(a)ieee.org> wrote: > >Everybody knows that adhesive tapes are to some extent malleable, Yet another dumb claim, by the dumb stat touter that touts stats he makes up on the fly, that are obviously false.
From: Archimedes' Lever on 21 Jun 2010 02:43 On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 22:13:44 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman <bill.sloman(a)ieee.org> wrote: > information that you claim to have, but don't >seem to be all the willing or able to propagate, as opposed to the >information that you know all about the subject, and could tell us if >you were so inclined. There was no question where someone wanted to 'know all about it'. You even dance around your stupidity in an ugly way.
From: Archimedes' Lever on 21 Jun 2010 02:44
On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 22:13:44 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman <bill.sloman(a)ieee.org> wrote: >One can see why you want to espouse this point of view. It's sad that >you can't provide any rational justification for your conviction. You are the one spouting insults, idiot. Me calling you an idiot is a mere iteration of fact. The proof is right here for all to see. You cannot achieve escape velocity. |