From: 98 Guy on 7 Jan 2010 21:48 DevilsPGD wrote: > > And if Microsoft's new OS is version 6.1, why are they calling it > > "Windows 7" ? > > Do you actually want to know, or are you just looking for another > non-sequitur ad hominem attempt at an insult? "Another" non-sequitur ad hominem attempt at an insult? Perhaps you'd like to point out the previous one? And yes - if you know of any Microsoft explanation, I would like to read it.
From: John Doe on 7 Jan 2010 21:59
Toolpackinmama <philnblanc(a)comcast.net> wrote: > 98 Guy wrote: > >> How do you feel about Vista and Win 7 - compared to XP ? > > I enjoyed using XP Pro for a long time and was reluctant to give > it up. I tried Vista and honestly hated it. I am now using Win > 7 Pro 32 bit, and I can honestly say that I like it. It's > stable, user-friendly, and pleasant to use. My newer games run > better on Win 7 than they did on XP or Vista. How do your games run better? As I recall, Windows Explorer has gotten worse, one of the problems started in Vista. In the folder view, using the down/up arrow keys to select a folder no longer shows its contents in the right-hand pane. In Windows XP, I regularly use the up/down arrow keys to view the contents of several folders in a row. Also, clicking on the folder name no longer expands the folder in the right-hand pane, you have to aim for the small plus sign to the left of the folder name. That would be no problem if Microsoft at least provided options for those of us who make use of those functions. Lastly, I like the idea of the new path bar, but the folder view is still necessary for clicking and dragging files around, so the path bar seems useless. If I wanted to move, I would probably check to see if the old Windows Explorer works in Windows 7. |