From: jimp on
In sci.physics habshi(a)anony.net wrote:

> The top state for wind energy potential is Texas, which has
> 435,638 km2 of wind land area where the capacity factor for wind at 80
> m hub height is 30%. After excluded lands (protected lands, parks,
> wilderness, urban area, airports, wetland, water features) are
> subtracted, the remaining 380,306 km2 represents 55% of the state
> which could install 1,901,530 MW of wind turbines and generate
> 6,527,000 (mistake?) GWh a year of renewable power.

Texas has already had one power "incident" because all the wind stopped.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
From: habshi on
Very interesting . check out the photo


http://articles.latimes.com/2010/may/25/business/la-fi-solar-plant-20100525

The sprawling solar installations gobbling up California's deserts
have a new competitor, one that claims to generate more energy at
lower costs while using less open space.

Known as concentrator photovoltaics, or CPV, the technology is
featured in an installation that will be revealed Tuesday at Victor
Valley College.

The school's new 1-megawatt plant, on a six-acre dirt plot in
Victorville, will provide around 30% of the campus' power.

From: habshi on
amazing how quickly the water boils!
So fresnel lenses may make us energy independent

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e4iU9kbn1wI&feature=related
From: jimp on
In sci.physics habshi(a)anony.net wrote:
> amazing how quickly the water boils!
> So fresnel lenses may make us energy independent

The Fresnel lens main claim to fame is cheapeness, has been in use since
1823, and is hardly news.

You are still an idiot.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
From: jmfbahciv on
habshi(a)anony.net wrote:
> amazing how quickly the water boils!
> So fresnel lenses may make us energy independent

There exists nothing which will make you independent of energy,
including when your're dead.

/BAH