From: habshi on
It doesnt cost you anything to install solar , in fact you make a
fat profit from day 1!

One day when all of American roofs are covered with solar panels
and people put this free electricity to manufacture goods(once the
installation costs are paid off) and hunderds of billions spent on
energy related imports stay at human and all Americans are rich , Jim
will realise he was wrong to oppose govt subsidies

excerpt
Once a skeptic, Florida businessman Vern Montgomery has seen the
light when it comes to rooftop renewable power. Montgomery was
persuaded by a neighbor last year to install a 22-kilowatt solar
system atop his carpet business.

The main attraction wasn't necessarily the prospect of becoming one of
his area�s first green-powered commercial installations, although that
was a plus. What swayed him was the economics.

Montgomery's solar setup cost $147,000, a big initial investment. But
the state's solar rebate program promised a rebate of $88,000. He
would also receive a federal tax credit of $50,000. In addition, tax
policies allowed him write off depreciation costs of $25,000 per year
for six years.

A no-brainer, especially considering the huge decreases in
Montgomery's subsequent electric bills.

Fortunately for Montgomery, the state's rebate program had enough
money to fund his rebate. He took the leap and has had no regrets. "I
think it was a phenomenal investment," he said.

From: bert on
On Mar 7, 8:00 am, hab...(a)anony.net wrote:
>   It doesnt cost you anything to install solar , in fact you make a
> fat profit from day 1!
>
>     One day when all of American roofs are covered with solar panels
> and people put this free electricity to manufacture goods(once the
> installation costs are paid off) and hunderds of billions spent on
> energy related imports stay at human and all Americans are rich , Jim
> will realise he was wrong to oppose govt subsidies
>
> excerpt
>   Once a skeptic, Florida businessman Vern Montgomery has seen the
> light when it comes to rooftop renewable power. Montgomery was
> persuaded by a neighbor last year to install a 22-kilowatt solar
> system atop his carpet business.
>
> The main attraction wasn't necessarily the prospect of becoming one of
> his area s first green-powered commercial installations, although that
> was a plus. What swayed him was the economics.
>
> Montgomery's solar setup cost $147,000, a big initial investment. But
> the state's solar rebate program promised a rebate of $88,000. He
> would also receive a federal tax credit of $50,000. In addition, tax
> policies allowed him write off depreciation costs of $25,000 per year
> for six years.
>
> A no-brainer, especially considering the huge decreases in
> Montgomery's subsequent electric bills.
>
> Fortunately for Montgomery, the state's rebate program had enough
> money to fund his rebate. He took the leap and has had no regrets. "I
> think it was a phenomenal investment," he said.

I use Sun's heat for cooling and heat water. Its simple needs no
solar cells. What I like best about it its free. TreBert
From: jimp on
In sci.physics habshi(a)anony.net wrote:
> It doesnt cost you anything to install solar , in fact you make a
> fat profit from day 1!

Utter, babbling nonsense.

> Montgomery's solar setup cost $147,000, a big initial investment. But
> the state's solar rebate program promised a rebate of $88,000. He
> would also receive a federal tax credit of $50,000. In addition, tax
> policies allowed him write off depreciation costs of $25,000 per year
> for six years.

So, he put out $147,000.

He gets a rebate of $88,000 some time later, leaving $59,000.

When he files his taxes, his tax bill is reduced by $50,000, leaving
$9,000.

A year later he has a depreciation of $25,000, which if he is in the
36% tax bracket means he saves $9,000 on his taxes and breaks even
somewhere between 1 to 2 years later.

And this simplistic calculation ignores the cost of money, which if included
would mean the break even point is 2 to 3 years.

Also none of the rebates, tax credits, or depreciation allowances are "free"
money, it comes out of taxpayers pockets in terms of higher taxes to
finance such schemes.

If this weren't run by a government agency, it would be called a Ponzi
scheme.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
From: tm on

<jimp(a)specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
news:1gvc67-4q9.ln1(a)mail.specsol.com...
> In sci.physics habshi(a)anony.net wrote:
>> It doesnt cost you anything to install solar , in fact you make a
>> fat profit from day 1!
>
> Utter, babbling nonsense.
>
>> Montgomery's solar setup cost $147,000, a big initial investment. But
>> the state's solar rebate program promised a rebate of $88,000. He
>> would also receive a federal tax credit of $50,000. In addition, tax
>> policies allowed him write off depreciation costs of $25,000 per year
>> for six years.
>
> So, he put out $147,000.
>
> He gets a rebate of $88,000 some time later, leaving $59,000.
>
> When he files his taxes, his tax bill is reduced by $50,000, leaving
> $9,000.
>
> A year later he has a depreciation of $25,000, which if he is in the
> 36% tax bracket means he saves $9,000 on his taxes and breaks even
> somewhere between 1 to 2 years later.
>
> And this simplistic calculation ignores the cost of money, which if
> included
> would mean the break even point is 2 to 3 years.
>
> Also none of the rebates, tax credits, or depreciation allowances are
> "free"
> money, it comes out of taxpayers pockets in terms of higher taxes to
> finance such schemes.
>
> If this weren't run by a government agency, it would be called a Ponzi
> scheme.
>

I sure hope people wake up by next November and put a stop to all this
bullshit and fraud.

But I don't have high hopes.


Tom




From: Michael Coburn on
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 16:05:53 +0000, jimp wrote:

> In sci.physics habshi(a)anony.net wrote:
>> It doesnt cost you anything to install solar , in fact you make a
>> fat profit from day 1!
>
> Utter, babbling nonsense.
>
>> Montgomery's solar setup cost $147,000, a big initial investment. But
>> the state's solar rebate program promised a rebate of $88,000. He would
>> also receive a federal tax credit of $50,000. In addition, tax policies
>> allowed him write off depreciation costs of $25,000 per year for six
>> years.
>
> So, he put out $147,000.
>
> He gets a rebate of $88,000 some time later, leaving $59,000.
>
> When he files his taxes, his tax bill is reduced by $50,000, leaving
> $9,000.
>
> A year later he has a depreciation of $25,000, which if he is in the 36%
> tax bracket means he saves $9,000 on his taxes and breaks even somewhere
> between 1 to 2 years later.
>
> And this simplistic calculation ignores the cost of money, which if
> included would mean the break even point is 2 to 3 years.
>
> Also none of the rebates, tax credits, or depreciation allowances are
> "free" money, it comes out of taxpayers pockets in terms of higher taxes
> to finance such schemes.
>
> If this weren't run by a government agency, it would be called a Ponzi
> scheme.

And it happens because morons like yourself overlook the _FACT_ that the
United States government does not have to borrow money from anyone at
all. It overlooks the _FACT_ that government does not esist to make a
profit and the _FACT_ that government exists to maintain a rational
market that allocates resources and output in respect of the general
welfare.

Thanx for playing. Have a nice day :)

--
"Senate rules don't trump the Constitution" -- http://GreaterVoice.org/60