What is wrong with this argument?
in [Logic]
|
Next: arithmetic in ZF
From: SOB) on 5 Apr 2005 10:23 On Tue, 05 Apr 2005 20:00:45 +1000, Masked Avenger <cootey59_remove(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> How come you are so ignorant? >How come you are such a pedantic dipshit ? <yawn> -- Million Mom March For Gun Confiscation http://home.houston.rr.com/rkba/mmm.html "If someone is so fearful that, that they're going to start using their weapons to protect their rights, it makes me very nervous that these people have these weapons at all!" --Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.)
From: Hector Plasmic on 5 Apr 2005 12:11 >> My "blathering" is that there are things I may never know >> and I am man enough to be able to admit it instead of >> making up fantasies to explain them. > All of us suffer from ignorance but that does not mean > we have to indulge it like atheists do. In other words, you consider it better to make something up and dishonestly call it the known truth rather than simply admit when you don't know something. And you wonder why we have no respect for you?
From: Hector Plasmic on 5 Apr 2005 12:13 > I can engage in discourse with those who will also > so engage, but Simple Septic is not among them. There you seem to have a point.
From: robpar on 5 Apr 2005 14:33 On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 20:16:16 GMT, sob(a)sob.com (Sweet Ol' Bob (SOB)) wrote: >On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 18:28:28 +0100, Jez ><iced_spear(a)NODAMNSPAMpipex.com> wrote: > >>if God was omnipotent, (Having unlimited >>or universal power, authority, or force; all-powerful), >>and could make a rock that was so heavy he couldn't lift it, it shows >>that he couldn't be omnipotent. > >Such a rock cannot exist in objective reality. It is a figment of >someone's imagination. > Correct just like your God, a figment of imagination. >Omnipotence is restricted to the real objective world if you are >talking about objects in the real objective world.
From: SOB) on 5 Apr 2005 15:20
On Tue, 05 Apr 2005 13:33:29 -0500, robpar <robpar(a)airmaildelete.net> wrote: >>Such a rock cannot exist in objective reality. It is a figment of >>someone's imagination. >Correct just like your God, a figment of imagination. I suppose the Universe is a figment of your imagination. If you were not so dull you would have understood the part where I said you must adopt the Worldview of Existential Realism in order to describe objective reality. I rejected the subjective world of imagination for purposes of describing the necessary existence of the Supreme Being. -- Million Mom March For Gun Confiscation http://home.houston.rr.com/rkba/mmm.html "If someone is so fearful that, that they're going to start using their weapons to protect their rights, it makes me very nervous that these people have these weapons at all!" --Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) |