What is wrong with this argument?
in [Logic]
|
Next: arithmetic in ZF
From: SOB) on 2 Apr 2005 00:24 On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 17:59:21 -0800, Earle Jones <earle.jones(a)comcast.net> wrote: >How does one "indulge in atheism"? By being stupid. >What does it hinder? The ability to see Truth and Beauty in the Universe. -- Million Mom March For Gun Confiscation http://home.houston.rr.com/rkba/mmm.html "If you build a man a fire and he will be warm for a day. If you set a man on fire, he will be warm for the rest of his life."
From: SOB) on 2 Apr 2005 00:25 On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 18:03:50 -0800, Earle Jones <earle.jones(a)comcast.net> wrote: >> Would you RTFM, fer chrissakes. You sound like a broken record. >Alternatively, you could just answer his question. Alternatively you could follow the threads and then you would know that I did answer the question. People need to follow the threads if they want to know what I have done. -- Million Mom March For Gun Confiscation http://home.houston.rr.com/rkba/mmm.html "If you build a man a fire and he will be warm for a day. If you set a man on fire, he will be warm for the rest of his life."
From: Charles & Mambo Duckman on 2 Apr 2005 03:57 Sweet Ol' Bob (SOB) wrote: >>How does one "indulge in atheism"? > > > By being stupid. > > >>What does it hinder? > > > The ability to see Truth and Beauty in the Universe. So now if I comment on this by saying that people who worship aardvark and other animal gods surely meet your requirements about seeing truth, pardon me, Truth and Beauty in the Universe, you'll call me a stoner, won't you? Btw, much like putting a hat and a bra on a cow doesn't make her a model, neither does capitalizing selected words make bullshit rational. -- Come down off the cross We can use the wood Tom Waits, Come On Up To The House
From: Charles & Mambo Duckman on 2 Apr 2005 03:59 Sweet Ol' Bob (SOB) wrote: > On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 18:03:50 -0800, Earle Jones > <earle.jones(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > >>>Would you RTFM, fer chrissakes. You sound like a broken record. > > >>Alternatively, you could just answer his question. > > > Alternatively you could follow the threads and then you would know > that I did answer the question. > > People need to follow the threads if they want to know what I have > done. Wait, you forgot to capitalize. It will make your arguments seem more important: Alternatively you could Follow the Threads and then you would know that I did answer the Question. People need to Follow the Threads if they want to Know what I have done. See? -- Come down off the cross We can use the wood Tom Waits, Come On Up To The House
From: bob young on 27 Mar 2005 23:55
The great philosopher-criminologist wrote: > What is wrong with saying that God works in Mysterious ways? ........nothing if one is a follower of primitive superstiion. |