What is wrong with this argument?
in [Logic]
|
Next: arithmetic in ZF
From: Iain on 2 Apr 2005 19:00 The great philosopher-criminologist wrote: > What is wrong with saying that God works in Mysterious ways? It's bollocks. ~Iain
From: SOB) on 2 Apr 2005 19:31 On Sat, 2 Apr 2005 16:23:28 -0500, "Tom" <mmman_90(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> Glad to see you understand. >Hey man, I retired from the business world eight years ago and I still have >vivid memories of what (B)bullshit is. You can't even keep your word. You said "enough" but obviously a compulsive bullshitter like you can't find the inner resources to stick by your stated convictions. -- Million Mom March For Gun Confiscation http://home.houston.rr.com/rkba/mmm.html "If you build a man a fire and he will be warm for a day. If you set a man on fire, he will be warm for the rest of his life."
From: SOB) on 2 Apr 2005 19:34 On 2 Apr 2005 16:00:24 -0800, "Iain" <iain_inkster(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> What is wrong with saying that God works in Mysterious ways? >It's bollocks. You understand Quantum Mechanics? It is not Mysterious to you? Please enlighten us. -- Million Mom March For Gun Confiscation http://home.houston.rr.com/rkba/mmm.html "If you build a man a fire and he will be warm for a day. If you set a man on fire, he will be warm for the rest of his life."
From: y�w�e on 2 Apr 2005 20:14 In <424f3992.66214150(a)news-server.houston.rr.com> Sweet Ol' Bob (SOB) trolled to [alt.atheism.satire]: > On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 15:49:18 -0600, robpar <robpar(a)airmaildelete.net> > wrote: > > >>How would you know - you haven't even read my arguments. > > >I have read all of your post, cross posted to talk.atheism. > > I posted my arguments in two posts that support my claim that the > Supreme Being exists. Yeah, right. Supreme Being = That Which Exists. Not so much an argument as a window into the medieval mind. -- 'There is less of this than meets the eye.' -Tallulah Bankhead
From: Masked Avenger on 2 Apr 2005 20:42
Sweet Ol' Bob (SOB) wrote: > On Sat, 2 Apr 2005 16:23:28 -0500, "Tom" <mmman_90(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > >>>Glad to see you understand. > > >>Hey man, I retired from the business world eight years ago and I still have >>vivid memories of what (B)bullshit is. > > > You can't even keep your word. You said "enough" but obviously a > compulsive bullshitter like you can't find the inner resources to > stick by your stated convictions. > You're a sorry piece of work SOB, all bluff and bluster, but no substance..... you seem to be labouring under the misapprehension that you are some kind of super genius ...... but you are coming across as just another jerk for Jesus ...... your 'physics' argument is laughable, of course physics can exist without God ..... most of your arguments are just ego driven meaningless psychobabble..... Your pathetic attempt at 'one-upmanship' with Tom is a good example of your style, Tom never said he wasn't going to talk to you anymore, he merely stated in his inimitable way that he had said enough on that point. The fact that he has other issues with you ( as have most in aa )in other parts of the thread doesn't seem to have crossed your mind ...... trying to shut down all opposing arguments by bluster won't work ..... -- Masked Avenger aa#2224 EAC Chief Technician in charge of remotely rigging Fundie 'Spell Checkers' so they all look like hick home schooled yokels Does Schroedinger's cat have 18 half lives ? |