From: Sam Wormley on
Enes wrote:
>
> Which clock is good to measure time?
> Does it depends of time only and not of gravity?

Use a clock (an accurate clock) where orientation does not
matter. Space based atomic clocks come to mind.

See: Relativistic Effects on Satellite Clocks
http://relativity.livingreviews.org/open?pubNo=lrr-2003-1&page=node5.html
From: Enes on
On 28 Lis, 20:54, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)mchsi.com> wrote:
> Enes wrote:
>
> > Which clock is good to measure time?
> > Does it depends of time only and not of gravity?
>
>    Use a clock (an accurate clock) where orientation does not
>    matter. Space based atomic clocks come to mind.
>
>    See: Relativistic Effects on Satellite Clocks
>      http://relativity.livingreviews.org/open?pubNo=lrr-2003-1&page=node5....

Let it be, that atomic clock not depends of gravity, measures time
only.

How can it measures different time in different gravity?
From: Sam Wormley on
Enes wrote:
> On 28 Lis, 20:54, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)mchsi.com> wrote:
>> Enes wrote:
>>
>>> Which clock is good to measure time?
>>> Does it depends of time only and not of gravity?
>> Use a clock (an accurate clock) where orientation does not
>> matter. Space based atomic clocks come to mind.
>>
>> See: Relativistic Effects on Satellite Clocks
>> http://relativity.livingreviews.org/open?pubNo=lrr-2003-1&page=node5....
>
> Let it be, that atomic clock not depends of gravity, measures time
> only.
>
> How can it measures different time in different gravity?

Gravitational time dilation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_time_dilation

But then you already knew that.

Enes wrote:
> When there is less gravitation:
> tiiiiik..........taaak, tiiiiik..........taaak....
>
> The time is quite different, than GR predicts.
From: Enes on
On 28 Lis, 21:31, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)mchsi.com> wrote:
> Enes wrote:
> > On 28 Lis, 20:54, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)mchsi.com> wrote:
> >> Enes wrote:
>
> >>> Which clock is good to measure time?
> >>> Does it depends of time only and not of gravity?
> >>    Use a clock (an accurate clock) where orientation does not
> >>    matter. Space based atomic clocks come to mind.
>
> >>    See: Relativistic Effects on Satellite Clocks
> >>      http://relativity.livingreviews.org/open?pubNo=lrr-2003-1&page=node5....
>
> > Let it be, that atomic clock not depends of gravity, measures time
> > only.
>
> > How can it measures different time in different gravity?
>
>    Gravitational time dilation
>      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_time_dilation
>
" Clocks which are far from massive bodies (or at higher gravitational
potentials) run faster, and clocks close to massive bodies (or at
lower gravitational potentials) run slower. This is because
gravitational time dilation is manifested in accelerated frames of
reference or, by virtue of the equivalence principle, in the
gravitational field of massive objects."

It is not true. Pendulum clock runs vice versa.

>    But then you already knew that.
>
> Enes wrote:
> > When there is less gravitation:
> > tiiiiik..........taaak,  tiiiiik..........taaak....
>
> > The time is quite different, than GR predicts.

From: Enes on
On 28 Lis, 20:54, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)mchsi.com> wrote:
> Enes wrote:
>
> > Which clock is good to measure time?
> > Does it depends of time only and not of gravity?
>
>    Use a clock (an accurate clock) where orientation does not
>    matter. Space based atomic clocks come to mind.
>
>    See: Relativistic Effects on Satellite Clocks
>      http://relativity.livingreviews.org/open?pubNo=lrr-2003-1&page=node5....

Btw, Sam,
in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pound-Rebka_experiment

was orientation matter or not ?