Win Hill: Inverse Marx Generator ??
in [Design]
|
From: George Jefferson on 13 Jul 2010 11:27 "John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message news:e0to36lpbf1d46kur9ar3gf0k8eqbs2p7p(a)4ax.com... > On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 04:50:52 -0500, "George Jefferson" > <phreon111(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >>"JosephKK" <quiettechblue(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >>news:1gsn36lhlos6n2664ku1ka0t8keuojuok1(a)4ax.com... >>> On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 13:54:02 -0500, John Fields >>> <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>Good grief, you *don't* understand this stuff. >>>>> >>>>>You, like AlwaysWrong, are certainly smart enough to learn the basics >>>>>of electrical circuit math, but for some emotional reason you have >>>>>chosen not to. I see that a lot in techs. They compensate by attacking >>>>>people who can do the arithmetic, calling them eggheads or >>>>>"inexperienced" or argue over definitions and third-order effects to >>>>>obscure the fact that there *are* calculable answers. >>>> >>>>--- >>>>Typical Larkinese. >>>> >>>>I usually show my work, while you, on the other hand, are the one who >>>>always waits until close to the end of the thread to start >>>>"explaining" what everyone's already laid out, pretending that it was >>>>your answer in the first place and issuing gratuitous slurs in order >>>>to try to demean your detractors. >>> >>> I have to grant the truthfulness of this to you JF. >> >>Larkin has some need to prove he is intelligent. Generally people that are >>like this are not intelligent and hence the reason Fields is correct. How >>else can Larkin "prove" he is intelligent if he is not. He can't come up >>with the right answer so he waits until someone else does then pretends it >>was his so he can claim that he is intelligent. He has to do this >>repeatedly >>to keep proving he is intelligent because he does things that are not >>intelligent(because that is what he really is). >> >> >> >> > > Show us some electronics you've designed. > I would but you'd probably still the idea. It wouldn't do any good because it wouldn't shut you up... you'd say the same thing to the next guy. Your just looking for someone that has a smaller penis than you so you can point and make fun of. If someone has a bigger one than you then you just move on to the next guy. Your not an engineer because engineers don't play such games. Your a con that parades around as an engineer. Oh wait... I shouldn't go that far. You are an engineer, a social engineer(and your not even good at that).
From: John Larkin on 13 Jul 2010 11:38 On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:27:00 -0500, "George Jefferson" <phreon111(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >"John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message >news:e0to36lpbf1d46kur9ar3gf0k8eqbs2p7p(a)4ax.com... >> On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 04:50:52 -0500, "George Jefferson" >> <phreon111(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>"JosephKK" <quiettechblue(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>news:1gsn36lhlos6n2664ku1ka0t8keuojuok1(a)4ax.com... >>>> On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 13:54:02 -0500, John Fields >>>> <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>Good grief, you *don't* understand this stuff. >>>>>> >>>>>>You, like AlwaysWrong, are certainly smart enough to learn the basics >>>>>>of electrical circuit math, but for some emotional reason you have >>>>>>chosen not to. I see that a lot in techs. They compensate by attacking >>>>>>people who can do the arithmetic, calling them eggheads or >>>>>>"inexperienced" or argue over definitions and third-order effects to >>>>>>obscure the fact that there *are* calculable answers. >>>>> >>>>>--- >>>>>Typical Larkinese. >>>>> >>>>>I usually show my work, while you, on the other hand, are the one who >>>>>always waits until close to the end of the thread to start >>>>>"explaining" what everyone's already laid out, pretending that it was >>>>>your answer in the first place and issuing gratuitous slurs in order >>>>>to try to demean your detractors. >>>> >>>> I have to grant the truthfulness of this to you JF. >>> >>>Larkin has some need to prove he is intelligent. Generally people that are >>>like this are not intelligent and hence the reason Fields is correct. How >>>else can Larkin "prove" he is intelligent if he is not. He can't come up >>>with the right answer so he waits until someone else does then pretends it >>>was his so he can claim that he is intelligent. He has to do this >>>repeatedly >>>to keep proving he is intelligent because he does things that are not >>>intelligent(because that is what he really is). >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> Show us some electronics you've designed. >> > >I would but you'd probably still the idea. It wouldn't do any good because >it wouldn't shut you up... you'd say the same thing to the next guy. Your >just looking for someone that has a smaller penis than you so you can point >and make fun of. If someone has a bigger one than you then you just move on >to the next guy. > >Your not an engineer because engineers don't play such games. Your a con >that parades around as an engineer. Oh wait... I shouldn't go that far. You >are an engineer, a social engineer(and your not even good at that). That's a lot of words to say "no." John
From: John Larkin on 13 Jul 2010 11:40 On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:33:05 -0700, UltimatePatriot <UltimatePatriot(a)thebestcountry.org> wrote: >On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:49:03 -0700, Fred Abse ><excretatauris(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: > >>The link I quoted explains the difference. >> > > Ding! > > Good way to get killed. > > Always count your shots and stop short of the last one, and reload >*without* the telltale fling-and-ring. Voice of experience. How many real life-and-death firefights have you been in? Paintball doesn't count. John
From: UltimatePatriot on 13 Jul 2010 11:41 On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:09:08 -0700, Fred Abse <excretatauris(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: > >Keep a few expended clips in your pocket, fire off seven, rapid, throw >a clip at a rock - Ping!. Tojo takes the opportunity to break cover and >move, and you put the last one in him. ;-) Now if only we could come up with a move today that does that in our current theater. Whack a rug!
From: UltimatePatriot on 13 Jul 2010 11:44
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:16:29 -0700, Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon(a)On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote: >On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:09:08 -0700, Fred Abse ><excretatauris(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: > >>On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:33:05 -0700, UltimatePatriot wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:49:03 -0700, Fred Abse >>> <excretatauris(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>The link I quoted explains the difference. >>>> >>>> >>> Ding! >>> >>> Good way to get killed. >> >>Many GIs found that out the hard way. >> >>> >>> Always count your shots and stop short of the last one, and reload >>> *without* the telltale fling-and-ring. >> >>Keep a few expended clips in your pocket, fire off seven, rapid, throw >>a clip at a rock - Ping!. Tojo takes the opportunity to break cover and >>move, and you put the last one in him. ;-) > >"Tojo"? Are you THAT old ?:-) > > ...Jim Thompson The guns were used in VietNam, but they were not pulling tricks like that, and not many carried them, especially as the war wore on. (war wore...I'll have to remember that one). They were used in North Korea as well, but I am not sure what the name was for those guys. Have to pull out my "Manchurian Candidate" DVD and watch the initial scenes to see what Hollywood was referring to them as back then. Very likely quite accurate. |