Win Hill: Inverse Marx Generator ??
in [Design]
|
From: John Larkin on 14 Jul 2010 10:09 On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 22:58:45 -0700, "JosephKK"<quiettechblue(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:38:39 -0700, John Larkin ><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > >>On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:27:00 -0500, "George Jefferson" >><phreon111(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>"John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message >>>news:e0to36lpbf1d46kur9ar3gf0k8eqbs2p7p(a)4ax.com... >>>> On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 04:50:52 -0500, "George Jefferson" >>>> <phreon111(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>"JosephKK" <quiettechblue(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>>>news:1gsn36lhlos6n2664ku1ka0t8keuojuok1(a)4ax.com... >>>>>> On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 13:54:02 -0500, John Fields >>>>>> <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>Good grief, you *don't* understand this stuff. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>You, like AlwaysWrong, are certainly smart enough to learn the basics >>>>>>>>of electrical circuit math, but for some emotional reason you have >>>>>>>>chosen not to. I see that a lot in techs. They compensate by attacking >>>>>>>>people who can do the arithmetic, calling them eggheads or >>>>>>>>"inexperienced" or argue over definitions and third-order effects to >>>>>>>>obscure the fact that there *are* calculable answers. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>--- >>>>>>>Typical Larkinese. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I usually show my work, while you, on the other hand, are the one who >>>>>>>always waits until close to the end of the thread to start >>>>>>>"explaining" what everyone's already laid out, pretending that it was >>>>>>>your answer in the first place and issuing gratuitous slurs in order >>>>>>>to try to demean your detractors. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have to grant the truthfulness of this to you JF. >>>>> >>>>>Larkin has some need to prove he is intelligent. Generally people that are >>>>>like this are not intelligent and hence the reason Fields is correct. How >>>>>else can Larkin "prove" he is intelligent if he is not. He can't come up >>>>>with the right answer so he waits until someone else does then pretends it >>>>>was his so he can claim that he is intelligent. He has to do this >>>>>repeatedly >>>>>to keep proving he is intelligent because he does things that are not >>>>>intelligent(because that is what he really is). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Show us some electronics you've designed. >>>> >>> >>>I would but you'd probably still the idea. It wouldn't do any good because >>>it wouldn't shut you up... you'd say the same thing to the next guy. Your >>>just looking for someone that has a smaller penis than you so you can point >>>and make fun of. If someone has a bigger one than you then you just move on >>>to the next guy. >>> >>>Your not an engineer because engineers don't play such games. Your a con >>>that parades around as an engineer. Oh wait... I shouldn't go that far. You >>>are an engineer, a social engineer(and your not even good at that). >> >>That's a lot of words to say "no." >> >>John > >Except what GJ really said is more like "Why should i give you something >for you to claim as your creation?" That's Olympic class weaseling. John
From: John Larkin on 14 Jul 2010 10:11 On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 07:55:51 -0500, John Fields <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote: >On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:40:18 -0700, John Larkin ><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > >>On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:33:05 -0700, UltimatePatriot >><UltimatePatriot(a)thebestcountry.org> wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:49:03 -0700, Fred Abse >>><excretatauris(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>The link I quoted explains the difference. >>>> >>> >>> Ding! >>> >>> Good way to get killed. >>> >>> Always count your shots and stop short of the last one, and reload >>>*without* the telltale fling-and-ring. >> >>Voice of experience. How many real life-and-death firefights have you >>been in? Paintball doesn't count. > >--- >Something you know nothing about, so you have to pick a fight? I was wondering if all the gun-totin' firefight wisdom was practical or theoretical. How many people here have ever been in a real-live-ammo, life-and-death gun fight, miliraty or otherwise? How many have seen someone get shot, in real life, real time? John
From: Mycelium on 14 Jul 2010 10:28 On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 07:07:23 -0700, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 23:53:20 -0700, UpYerNose ><UpYerNose(a)witarubbahose.org> wrote: > >>On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 23:16:57 -0600, m II <c(a)in.the.hat> wrote: >> >>> Anyone with 90+ Usenet identities has >>>ISSUES. Let us pray.. >> >> >> Actually, anyone that has issues with the number of nyms another person >>uses, has issues. > >Anyone who won't use his real name, and pretends to all sorts of >superhero identities, is both juvenile and cowardly. > >John You have to be an absolute utter retard to claim that my nyms are super heroes or that my theme is of that nature. Nature is the theme, Johnny. But I do not expect that you have any grasp of that realm either.
From: Spehro Pefhany on 14 Jul 2010 10:46 On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 07:07:23 -0700, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 23:53:20 -0700, UpYerNose ><UpYerNose(a)witarubbahose.org> wrote: > >>On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 23:16:57 -0600, m II <c(a)in.the.hat> wrote: >> >>> Anyone with 90+ Usenet identities has >>>ISSUES. Let us pray.. >> >> >> Actually, anyone that has issues with the number of nyms another person >>uses, has issues. > >Anyone who won't use his real name, and pretends to all sorts of >superhero identities, is both juvenile and cowardly. > >John Some superheroes are are more useful than others: http://pbfcomics.com/archive_b/PBF136-Super_League.jpg
From: Jim Thompson on 14 Jul 2010 10:42
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 07:09:04 -0700, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 22:58:45 -0700, >"JosephKK"<quiettechblue(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >>On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:38:39 -0700, John Larkin >><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:27:00 -0500, "George Jefferson" >>><phreon111(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>"John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message >>>>news:e0to36lpbf1d46kur9ar3gf0k8eqbs2p7p(a)4ax.com... >>>>> On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 04:50:52 -0500, "George Jefferson" >>>>> <phreon111(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>"JosephKK" <quiettechblue(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>>>>news:1gsn36lhlos6n2664ku1ka0t8keuojuok1(a)4ax.com... >>>>>>> On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 13:54:02 -0500, John Fields >>>>>>> <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Good grief, you *don't* understand this stuff. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>You, like AlwaysWrong, are certainly smart enough to learn the basics >>>>>>>>>of electrical circuit math, but for some emotional reason you have >>>>>>>>>chosen not to. I see that a lot in techs. They compensate by attacking >>>>>>>>>people who can do the arithmetic, calling them eggheads or >>>>>>>>>"inexperienced" or argue over definitions and third-order effects to >>>>>>>>>obscure the fact that there *are* calculable answers. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>--- >>>>>>>>Typical Larkinese. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>I usually show my work, while you, on the other hand, are the one who >>>>>>>>always waits until close to the end of the thread to start >>>>>>>>"explaining" what everyone's already laid out, pretending that it was >>>>>>>>your answer in the first place and issuing gratuitous slurs in order >>>>>>>>to try to demean your detractors. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have to grant the truthfulness of this to you JF. >>>>>> >>>>>>Larkin has some need to prove he is intelligent. Generally people that are >>>>>>like this are not intelligent and hence the reason Fields is correct. How >>>>>>else can Larkin "prove" he is intelligent if he is not. He can't come up >>>>>>with the right answer so he waits until someone else does then pretends it >>>>>>was his so he can claim that he is intelligent. He has to do this >>>>>>repeatedly >>>>>>to keep proving he is intelligent because he does things that are not >>>>>>intelligent(because that is what he really is). >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Show us some electronics you've designed. >>>>> >>>> >>>>I would but you'd probably still the idea. It wouldn't do any good because >>>>it wouldn't shut you up... you'd say the same thing to the next guy. Your >>>>just looking for someone that has a smaller penis than you so you can point >>>>and make fun of. If someone has a bigger one than you then you just move on >>>>to the next guy. >>>> >>>>Your not an engineer because engineers don't play such games. Your a con >>>>that parades around as an engineer. Oh wait... I shouldn't go that far. You >>>>are an engineer, a social engineer(and your not even good at that). >>> >>>That's a lot of words to say "no." >>> >>>John >> >>Except what GJ really said is more like "Why should i give you something >>for you to claim as your creation?" > >That's Olympic class weaseling. > >John I think it is you, John Larkin, who holds the Gold Medal in that category. ...Jim Thompson -- | James E.Thompson, CTO | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | | | Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 | Obama isn't going to raise your taxes...it's Bush' fault: Not re- newing the Bush tax cuts will increase the bottom tier rate by 50% |