From: John Larkin on
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:45:37 -0500, John Fields
<jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 08:46:06 -0700, John Larkin
><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 07:58:50 -0700, AM
>><thisthatandtheother(a)beherenow.org> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 07:15:18 -0700, John Larkin
>>><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>I avoided the military because I was afraid it would wreck my
>>>>creativity, which in my experience it tends to do.
>>>
>>> "I avoided..." and "in my experience..."
>>>
>>> I think that qualifies as "mutually exclusive".
>>
>>Not so. I've interviewed and hired a number of ex-military techs, and
>>I found them to be universally rigid, rule-bound, and inflexible. And
>>I did spend a week as a guest of the Navy, in Charleston, in a program
>>that was designed to make me want to be a naval officer; it had the
>>opposite effect. Even at the age of 16, it was obvious that these guys
>>had, by my standards, serious masculinity problems.
>
>---
>They were more like men than you wanted them to be?

They tended to be rigid and rule-driven. And they tended to respect me
too much as "the boss", sort of a superior officer thing I guess. That
meant that if I told them to do something that that turned out to be
wrong, they'd just keep doing it. That's not what I need.

>---
>
>>And I've designed lots of military electronics,
>
>---
>How can you reconcile that statement having previously posted:
>
>"I *was* in the Navy for a week, sort of, and that convinced me
>that I'd be [better off avoiding the military,] in business or in real
>life." ? (Brackets mine)
>---

When I did the formal military electronics, I didn't own the company,
so I chust vas following orderss like a good soldier. We have done
some lately, like the AH130 heads-up display, but it was "COTS", which
means they bought commercial-quality stuff without all the MIL
nonsense. Turns out that the COTS stuff is, on average, more reliable
than the formal MIL electronics. The system we replaced had a flight
MTBF of 22 hours.

Have you ever designed official MIL-spec electronics, using all
approved JAN parts and rules and multiple design reviews/qual
testing/acceptance testing/source inspection?

>
>>enough to know that I prefer to do less
>>constrained stuff.
>
>---
>The reason military stuff is as constrained as it is is because
>people's lives depend on it, and you, basically, like to play fast and
>loose and get away with as much as you can.

Precisely. They follow rules, I make or break rules.

John

From: Paul Hovnanian P.E. on
Jim Thompson wrote:

> On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 20:46:10 -0700, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
> <Paul(a)Hovnanian.com> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>>
>>Oooh. Its the old "where did the energy go" two cap puzzle.
>>
> [snip]
>
> Which is trivial to solve :-)

I posted my solution on a.b.s.e. as Two Cap Puzzle.

--
Paul Hovnanian paul(a)hovnanian.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have gnu, will travel.
From: Jim Thompson on
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:36:44 -0700, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
<paul(a)hovnanian.com> wrote:

>Jim Thompson wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 20:46:10 -0700, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
>> <Paul(a)Hovnanian.com> wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>>
>>>Oooh. Its the old "where did the energy go" two cap puzzle.
>>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> Which is trivial to solve :-)
>
>I posted my solution on a.b.s.e. as Two Cap Puzzle.

Yep. Now where's your solution to Larkin's Folly #9 ?:-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, CTO | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

Since New Yorkers think it appropriate to boycott Arizona over
stopping illegal immigration and drug trafficking, I suggest that
everyone else support building the Muslim Monument at Ground Zero
From: Jim Thompson on
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:45:37 -0500, John Fields
<jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 08:46:06 -0700, John Larkin
><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 07:58:50 -0700, AM
>><thisthatandtheother(a)beherenow.org> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 07:15:18 -0700, John Larkin
>>><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>I avoided the military because I was afraid it would wreck my
>>>>creativity, which in my experience it tends to do.
>>>
>>> "I avoided..." and "in my experience..."
>>>
>>> I think that qualifies as "mutually exclusive".
>>
>>Not so. I've interviewed and hired a number of ex-military techs, and
>>I found them to be universally rigid, rule-bound, and inflexible. And
>>I did spend a week as a guest of the Navy, in Charleston, in a program
>>that was designed to make me want to be a naval officer; it had the
>>opposite effect. Even at the age of 16, it was obvious that these guys
>>had, by my standards, serious masculinity problems.
>
>---
>They were more like men than you wanted them to be?
>---
>
>>And I've designed lots of military electronics,
>
>---
>How can you reconcile that statement having previously posted:
>
>"I *was* in the Navy for a week, sort of, and that convinced me
>that I'd be [better off avoiding the military,] in business or in real
>life." ? (Brackets mine)
>---
>
>>enough to know that I prefer to do less
>>constrained stuff.
>
>---
>The reason military stuff is as constrained as it is is because
>people's lives depend on it, and you, basically, like to play fast and
>loose and get away with as much as you can.

Bwahahahaha!

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, CTO | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

Since New Yorkers think it appropriate to boycott Arizona over
stopping illegal immigration and drug trafficking, I suggest that
everyone else support building the Muslim Monument at Ground Zero
From: John Larkin on
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:03:43 -0500, John Fields
<jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 20:33:34 -0700, John Larkin
><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>
>
>>We once worked with a guy who was always chewing on parts. So somebody
>>left a charged electrolytic cap on his desk.
>
>---
>"so"?
>
>As if it were an inescapable, preordained consequence?

You'll never know what happened.

>
>And "Somebody"???

Not me. I hate practical jokes.

John