Wonderful!
in [Physics]
|
From: Inertial on 27 Dec 2009 22:51 spudnik" <Space998(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:7a5681be-f600-48a7-95d3-0b720f64f835(a)t42g2000vba.googlegroups.com... > M&M did not get nulls. (I first read of this > in the government-rebooted Larouchie science mag, and later that > Einstein pooh-poohed DCMiller's refinement, > when he read his results in a journal, while at his office > in Caltech. but, surfer's paper, below, > pits this all into perspective.) They got results consistent with null (given experimental error), and inconcistent with the expected non-null result predicted
From: mpc755 on 28 Dec 2009 09:04 On Dec 27, 10:51 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > spudnik" <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > > news:7a5681be-f600-48a7-95d3-0b720f64f835(a)t42g2000vba.googlegroups.com... > > > M&M did not get nulls. (I first read of this > > in the government-rebooted Larouchie science mag, and later that > > Einstein pooh-poohed DCMiller's refinement, > > when he read his results in a journal, while at his office > > in Caltech. but, surfer's paper, below, > > pits this all into perspective.) > > They got results consistent with null (given experimental error), and > inconcistent with the expected non-null result predicted The MMX experiments are evidence of aether entrainment.
From: spudnik on 28 Dec 2009 13:30 neither M&M or their successors incurred this nullity, that proven by Einstein's say-so at Caltech; fig. 3, belowsville, puts these results together in one picture. now, surfer's lagnuage may be peculiar, but, so, What? > > They got results consistent with null (given experimental error), and > > inconcistent with the expected non-null result predicted > The MMX experiments are evidence of aether entrainment. http://arxiv.org/abs/0804.0039 "......The spacecraft observations demonstrate again that the speed of light is not invariant, and is isotropic only with respect to a dynamical 3-space....." --l'OEuvre, http://wlym.com http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/Articles_2009/Relativistic_Moon... FCUK Copenhagen free carbon-credit trade rip-off; put a tariff on imported energy!
From: mpc755 on 28 Dec 2009 13:49 On Dec 28, 1:30 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > neither M&M or their successors incurred this nullity, > that proven by Einstein's say-so at Caltech; > fig. 3, belowsville, puts these results together in one picture. now, > surfer's lagnuage may be peculiar, but, so, What? > > > > They got results consistent with null (given experimental error), and > > > inconcistent with the expected non-null result predicted > > The MMX experiments are evidence of aether entrainment. > > http://arxiv.org/abs/0804.0039 > "......The spacecraft observations demonstrate again that > the speed of light is not invariant, and is isotropic > only with respect to a dynamical 3-space....." > Yes, because light travels at 'c' with respect to the aether.
From: Inertial on 28 Dec 2009 18:21
"spudnik" <Space998(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:23dda1a8-ea54-47f9-9008-4b81689f222b(a)f6g2000vbp.googlegroups.com... > neither M&M or their successors incurred this nullity, > that proven by Einstein's say-so at Caltech; They found a result that was null within experimental error. They did not get anything near the non-null result they were expecting. |