Zero Size Physics, revisited
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Way off topic: oil and politics (was: Hexagonal grid and itsthree directions)
Next: New Solutions Manuals, Test Banks, Instructor Manuals 2011
From: mpc755 on 29 May 2010 21:25 On May 29, 9:04 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On May 29, 5:58 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 29, 8:55 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On May 29, 5:50 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 29, 8:35 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > On May 29, 5:02 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 29, 7:52 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On May 29, 4:26 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On May 29, 3:33 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On May 29, 4:28 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On May 29, 7:21 am, eon <ynes9...(a)techemail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > the predictors says that all particles are > > > > > > > > > > > zero size, dimensions disappears ! > > > > > > > > > > > > no lengths, areas, volumes and space > > > > > > > > > > > at particles level, say under 100 pico > > > > > > > > > > > > so if no volume, no space, no dimensions !!! > > > > > > > > > > > > how then does a particle knows in which > > > > > > > > > > > direction she must travel ??? > > > > > > > > > > > > i wish i could understand > > > > > > > > > > > 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics > > > > > > > > > > by the double solution theory > > > > > > > > > > Louis de BROGLIE'http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf > > > > > > > > > > > 'I called this relation, which determines the particle's motion in the > > > > > > > > > > wave, "the guidance formula". It may easily be generalized to the case > > > > > > > > > > of an external field acting on the particle.' > > > > > > > > > > > 'The particle when in motion on its wave, thus has its vibration > > > > > > > > > > constantly in phase with that of the wave. This result may be > > > > > > > > > > interpreted by noticing that, in the present theory, the particle is > > > > > > > > > > de¯ned as a very small region of the wave where the amplitude is very > > > > > > > > > > large, and it therefore seems quite natural that the internal motion > > > > > > > > > > rythm of the particle should always be the same as that of the wave at > > > > > > > > > > the point where the particle is located. A very important point must > > > > > > > > > > be underlined here. For this interpretation of the guidance to be > > > > > > > > > > acceptable, the dimensions of the minute singular region constituting > > > > > > > > > > the particle ought to be very small compared to the wavelength of the > > > > > > > > > > v wave.' > > > > > > > > > > > The 'particle' occupies a very small region of its associated wave. > > > > > > > > > > The external field acting on the particle is the aether.. > > > > > > > > > > > A moving particle has an associated aether wave. > > > > > > > > > > > The moving particle and the wave act as one. > > > > > > > > > > They exist together... > > > > > > > > > and act as one.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > What do you mean by that? > > > > > > > They are together. > > > > > > > Please don't give me repeated text. > > > > > > > > The aether wave vibrates its particle of energy. An example is a wave > > > > > > > electron, or a wave proton or a wave neutron. > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > It's repeated text because de Broglie said it best: > > > > > > > "The particle when in motion on its wave, thus has its vibration > > > > > > constantly in phase with that of the wave." > > > > > > > The particle's vibration constantly in phase with that of the wave is > > > > > > the particle and the wave acting as one. > > > > > > > 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics > > > > > > by the double solution theory > > > > > > Louis de BROGLIE'http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf > > > > > > > 'The particle when in motion on its wave, thus has its vibration > > > > > > constantly in phase with that of the wave. This result may be > > > > > > interpreted by noticing that, in the present theory, the particle is > > > > > > de¯ned as a very small region of the wave where the amplitude is very > > > > > > large, and it therefore seems quite natural that the internal motion > > > > > > rythm of the particle should always be the same as that of the wave at > > > > > > the point where the particle is located. A very important point must > > > > > > be underlined here. For this interpretation of the guidance to be > > > > > > acceptable, the dimensions of the minute singular region constituting > > > > > > the particle ought to be very small compared to the wavelength of the > > > > > > v wave.' > > > > > > > 'I called this relation, which determines the particle's motion in the > > > > > > wave, "the guidance formula". It may easily be generalized to the case > > > > > > of an external field acting on the particle.' > > > > > > > The 'particle' occupies a very small region of its associated wave. > > > > > > The external field acting on the particle is the aether. > > > > > > > A moving particle has an associated aether wave. > > > > > > > The particle and the wave act as one.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > There we go. The repeated text. > > > > > > Subatomic aether waves and point particles of energy exist together. > > > > > One vibrating the other until it goes inside. This is caused by light > > > > > flow touch. > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > The moving particle and its associated aether wave exist together. > > > > They act as one.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > With light around the wave goes inside. That is why it is measured > > > without a wave at the two slits and it piles up directly behind the > > > holes at the detection screen. > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > Double slit experiments have been performed with a single photon.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > How do we see it pass through the holes? Does it give off a light of > its own for us to see? > NO. > The photon is detected. If detectors are placed at the entrances to a single photon double slit experiment the photon is always detected entering a single slit. If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits the photon is always detected exiting a single slit. This is experimental evidence the photon 'particle' always enters and exits a single slit. > Mitch Raemsch
From: BURT on 29 May 2010 21:33 On May 29, 6:25 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On May 29, 9:04 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 29, 5:58 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On May 29, 8:55 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 29, 5:50 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On May 29, 8:35 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 29, 5:02 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On May 29, 7:52 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On May 29, 4:26 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On May 29, 3:33 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On May 29, 4:28 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 29, 7:21 am, eon <ynes9...(a)techemail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > the predictors says that all particles are > > > > > > > > > > > > zero size, dimensions disappears ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > no lengths, areas, volumes and space > > > > > > > > > > > > at particles level, say under 100 pico > > > > > > > > > > > > > so if no volume, no space, no dimensions !!! > > > > > > > > > > > > > how then does a particle knows in which > > > > > > > > > > > > direction she must travel ??? > > > > > > > > > > > > > i wish i could understand > > > > > > > > > > > > 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics > > > > > > > > > > > by the double solution theory > > > > > > > > > > > Louis de BROGLIE'http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf > > > > > > > > > > > > 'I called this relation, which determines the particle's motion in the > > > > > > > > > > > wave, "the guidance formula". It may easily be generalized to the case > > > > > > > > > > > of an external field acting on the particle.' > > > > > > > > > > > > 'The particle when in motion on its wave, thus has its vibration > > > > > > > > > > > constantly in phase with that of the wave. This result may be > > > > > > > > > > > interpreted by noticing that, in the present theory, the particle is > > > > > > > > > > > de¯ned as a very small region of the wave where the amplitude is very > > > > > > > > > > > large, and it therefore seems quite natural that the internal motion > > > > > > > > > > > rythm of the particle should always be the same as that of the wave at > > > > > > > > > > > the point where the particle is located. A very important point must > > > > > > > > > > > be underlined here. For this interpretation of the guidance to be > > > > > > > > > > > acceptable, the dimensions of the minute singular region constituting > > > > > > > > > > > the particle ought to be very small compared to the wavelength of the > > > > > > > > > > > v wave.' > > > > > > > > > > > > The 'particle' occupies a very small region of its associated wave. > > > > > > > > > > > The external field acting on the particle is the aether. > > > > > > > > > > > > A moving particle has an associated aether wave. > > > > > > > > > > > > The moving particle and the wave act as one. > > > > > > > > > > > They exist together... > > > > > > > > > > and act as one.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > What do you mean by that? > > > > > > > > They are together. > > > > > > > > Please don't give me repeated text. > > > > > > > > > The aether wave vibrates its particle of energy. An example is a wave > > > > > > > > electron, or a wave proton or a wave neutron. > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > It's repeated text because de Broglie said it best: > > > > > > > > "The particle when in motion on its wave, thus has its vibration > > > > > > > constantly in phase with that of the wave." > > > > > > > > The particle's vibration constantly in phase with that of the wave is > > > > > > > the particle and the wave acting as one. > > > > > > > > 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics > > > > > > > by the double solution theory > > > > > > > Louis de BROGLIE'http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf > > > > > > > > 'The particle when in motion on its wave, thus has its vibration > > > > > > > constantly in phase with that of the wave. This result may be > > > > > > > interpreted by noticing that, in the present theory, the particle is > > > > > > > de¯ned as a very small region of the wave where the amplitude is very > > > > > > > large, and it therefore seems quite natural that the internal motion > > > > > > > rythm of the particle should always be the same as that of the wave at > > > > > > > the point where the particle is located. A very important point must > > > > > > > be underlined here. For this interpretation of the guidance to be > > > > > > > acceptable, the dimensions of the minute singular region constituting > > > > > > > the particle ought to be very small compared to the wavelength of the > > > > > > > v wave.' > > > > > > > > 'I called this relation, which determines the particle's motion in the > > > > > > > wave, "the guidance formula". It may easily be generalized to the case > > > > > > > of an external field acting on the particle.' > > > > > > > > The 'particle' occupies a very small region of its associated wave. > > > > > > > The external field acting on the particle is the aether. > > > > > > > > A moving particle has an associated aether wave. > > > > > > > > The particle and the wave act as one.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > There we go. The repeated text. > > > > > > > Subatomic aether waves and point particles of energy exist together. > > > > > > One vibrating the other until it goes inside. This is caused by light > > > > > > flow touch. > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > The moving particle and its associated aether wave exist together.. > > > > > They act as one.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > With light around the wave goes inside. That is why it is measured > > > > without a wave at the two slits and it piles up directly behind the > > > > holes at the detection screen. > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > Double slit experiments have been performed with a single photon.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > How do we see it pass through the holes? Does it give off a light of > > its own for us to see? > > NO. > > The photon is detected. If detectors are placed at the entrances to a No. The detectors you talk about can not even exist. I challenge you to define these detectors before we go on. You cannot believe everything you read. I believe you are subjected to misinformation. Mitch Raemsch
From: mpc755 on 29 May 2010 21:41 On May 29, 9:33 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On May 29, 6:25 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 29, 9:04 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On May 29, 5:58 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 29, 8:55 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > On May 29, 5:50 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 29, 8:35 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On May 29, 5:02 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On May 29, 7:52 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On May 29, 4:26 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On May 29, 3:33 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 29, 4:28 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 29, 7:21 am, eon <ynes9...(a)techemail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the predictors says that all particles are > > > > > > > > > > > > > zero size, dimensions disappears ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > no lengths, areas, volumes and space > > > > > > > > > > > > > at particles level, say under 100 pico > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so if no volume, no space, no dimensions !!! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > how then does a particle knows in which > > > > > > > > > > > > > direction she must travel ??? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i wish i could understand > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics > > > > > > > > > > > > by the double solution theory > > > > > > > > > > > > Louis de BROGLIE'http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'I called this relation, which determines the particle's motion in the > > > > > > > > > > > > wave, "the guidance formula". It may easily be generalized to the case > > > > > > > > > > > > of an external field acting on the particle.' > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'The particle when in motion on its wave, thus has its vibration > > > > > > > > > > > > constantly in phase with that of the wave. This result may be > > > > > > > > > > > > interpreted by noticing that, in the present theory, the particle is > > > > > > > > > > > > de¯ned as a very small region of the wave where the amplitude is very > > > > > > > > > > > > large, and it therefore seems quite natural that the internal motion > > > > > > > > > > > > rythm of the particle should always be the same as that of the wave at > > > > > > > > > > > > the point where the particle is located. A very important point must > > > > > > > > > > > > be underlined here. For this interpretation of the guidance to be > > > > > > > > > > > > acceptable, the dimensions of the minute singular region constituting > > > > > > > > > > > > the particle ought to be very small compared to the wavelength of the > > > > > > > > > > > > v wave.' > > > > > > > > > > > > > The 'particle' occupies a very small region of its associated wave. > > > > > > > > > > > > The external field acting on the particle is the aether. > > > > > > > > > > > > > A moving particle has an associated aether wave. > > > > > > > > > > > > > The moving particle and the wave act as one. > > > > > > > > > > > > They exist together... > > > > > > > > > > > and act as one.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > What do you mean by that? > > > > > > > > > They are together. > > > > > > > > > Please don't give me repeated text. > > > > > > > > > > The aether wave vibrates its particle of energy. An example is a wave > > > > > > > > > electron, or a wave proton or a wave neutron. > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > It's repeated text because de Broglie said it best: > > > > > > > > > "The particle when in motion on its wave, thus has its vibration > > > > > > > > constantly in phase with that of the wave." > > > > > > > > > The particle's vibration constantly in phase with that of the wave is > > > > > > > > the particle and the wave acting as one. > > > > > > > > > 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics > > > > > > > > by the double solution theory > > > > > > > > Louis de BROGLIE'http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf > > > > > > > > > 'The particle when in motion on its wave, thus has its vibration > > > > > > > > constantly in phase with that of the wave. This result may be > > > > > > > > interpreted by noticing that, in the present theory, the particle is > > > > > > > > de¯ned as a very small region of the wave where the amplitude is very > > > > > > > > large, and it therefore seems quite natural that the internal motion > > > > > > > > rythm of the particle should always be the same as that of the wave at > > > > > > > > the point where the particle is located. A very important point must > > > > > > > > be underlined here. For this interpretation of the guidance to be > > > > > > > > acceptable, the dimensions of the minute singular region constituting > > > > > > > > the particle ought to be very small compared to the wavelength of the > > > > > > > > v wave.' > > > > > > > > > 'I called this relation, which determines the particle's motion in the > > > > > > > > wave, "the guidance formula". It may easily be generalized to the case > > > > > > > > of an external field acting on the particle.' > > > > > > > > > The 'particle' occupies a very small region of its associated wave. > > > > > > > > The external field acting on the particle is the aether. > > > > > > > > > A moving particle has an associated aether wave. > > > > > > > > > The particle and the wave act as one.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > There we go. The repeated text. > > > > > > > > Subatomic aether waves and point particles of energy exist together. > > > > > > > One vibrating the other until it goes inside. This is caused by light > > > > > > > flow touch. > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > The moving particle and its associated aether wave exist together. > > > > > > They act as one.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > With light around the wave goes inside. That is why it is measured > > > > > without a wave at the two slits and it piles up directly behind the > > > > > holes at the detection screen. > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > Double slit experiments have been performed with a single photon.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > How do we see it pass through the holes? Does it give off a light of > > > its own for us to see? > > > NO. > > > The photon is detected. If detectors are placed at the entrances to a > > No. The detectors you talk about can not even exist. > I challenge you to define these detectors before we go on. > You cannot believe everything you read. I believe you are subjected to > misinformation. > > Mitch Raemsch 'Single Photon Interference ' http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~scdiroff/lds/QuantumRelativity/SinglePhotonInterference/SinglePhotonInterference.html "In this demonstration we perform the double-slit interference experiment with extremely dim light. Rather than the usual screen, the arrival of individual photons is registered and stored electronically. This alone is evidence for the graininess or particle nature of light." The graininess or particle nature of light travels a single path.
From: BURT on 29 May 2010 21:54 On May 29, 6:41 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On May 29, 9:33 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 29, 6:25 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On May 29, 9:04 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 29, 5:58 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On May 29, 8:55 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 29, 5:50 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On May 29, 8:35 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On May 29, 5:02 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On May 29, 7:52 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On May 29, 4:26 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 29, 3:33 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 29, 4:28 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 29, 7:21 am, eon <ynes9...(a)techemail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the predictors says that all particles are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > zero size, dimensions disappears ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > no lengths, areas, volumes and space > > > > > > > > > > > > > > at particles level, say under 100 pico > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so if no volume, no space, no dimensions !!! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > how then does a particle knows in which > > > > > > > > > > > > > > direction she must travel ??? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i wish i could understand > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics > > > > > > > > > > > > > by the double solution theory > > > > > > > > > > > > > Louis de BROGLIE'http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'I called this relation, which determines the particle's motion in the > > > > > > > > > > > > > wave, "the guidance formula". It may easily be generalized to the case > > > > > > > > > > > > > of an external field acting on the particle.' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'The particle when in motion on its wave, thus has its vibration > > > > > > > > > > > > > constantly in phase with that of the wave. This result may be > > > > > > > > > > > > > interpreted by noticing that, in the present theory, the particle is > > > > > > > > > > > > > de¯ned as a very small region of the wave where the amplitude is very > > > > > > > > > > > > > large, and it therefore seems quite natural that the internal motion > > > > > > > > > > > > > rythm of the particle should always be the same as that of the wave at > > > > > > > > > > > > > the point where the particle is located. A very important point must > > > > > > > > > > > > > be underlined here. For this interpretation of the guidance to be > > > > > > > > > > > > > acceptable, the dimensions of the minute singular region constituting > > > > > > > > > > > > > the particle ought to be very small compared to the wavelength of the > > > > > > > > > > > > > v wave.' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The 'particle' occupies a very small region of its associated wave. > > > > > > > > > > > > > The external field acting on the particle is the aether. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A moving particle has an associated aether wave. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The moving particle and the wave act as one. > > > > > > > > > > > > > They exist together... > > > > > > > > > > > > and act as one.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > What do you mean by that? > > > > > > > > > > They are together. > > > > > > > > > > Please don't give me repeated text. > > > > > > > > > > > The aether wave vibrates its particle of energy. An example is a wave > > > > > > > > > > electron, or a wave proton or a wave neutron. > > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > > It's repeated text because de Broglie said it best: > > > > > > > > > > "The particle when in motion on its wave, thus has its vibration > > > > > > > > > constantly in phase with that of the wave." > > > > > > > > > > The particle's vibration constantly in phase with that of the wave is > > > > > > > > > the particle and the wave acting as one. > > > > > > > > > > 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics > > > > > > > > > by the double solution theory > > > > > > > > > Louis de BROGLIE'http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf > > > > > > > > > > 'The particle when in motion on its wave, thus has its vibration > > > > > > > > > constantly in phase with that of the wave. This result may be > > > > > > > > > interpreted by noticing that, in the present theory, the particle is > > > > > > > > > de¯ned as a very small region of the wave where the amplitude is very > > > > > > > > > large, and it therefore seems quite natural that the internal motion > > > > > > > > > rythm of the particle should always be the same as that of the wave at > > > > > > > > > the point where the particle is located. A very important point must > > > > > > > > > be underlined here. For this interpretation of the guidance to be > > > > > > > > > acceptable, the dimensions of the minute singular region constituting > > > > > > > > > the particle ought to be very small compared to the wavelength of the > > > > > > > > > v wave.' > > > > > > > > > > 'I called this relation, which determines the particle's motion in the > > > > > > > > > wave, "the guidance formula". It may easily be generalized to the case > > > > > > > > > of an external field acting on the particle.' > > > > > > > > > > The 'particle' occupies a very small region of its associated wave. > > > > > > > > > The external field acting on the particle is the aether. > > > > > > > > > > A moving particle has an associated aether wave. > > > > > > > > > > The particle and the wave act as one.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > There we go. The repeated text. > > > > > > > > > Subatomic aether waves and point particles of energy exist together. > > > > > > > > One vibrating the other until it goes inside. This is caused by light > > > > > > > > flow touch. > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > The moving particle and its associated aether wave exist together. > > > > > > > They act as one.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > With light around the wave goes inside. That is why it is measured > > > > > > without a wave at the two slits and it piles up directly behind the > > > > > > holes at the detection screen. > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > Double slit experiments have been performed with a single photon.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > How do we see it pass through the holes? Does it give off a light of > > > > its own for us to see? > > > > NO. > > > > The photon is detected. If detectors are placed at the entrances to a > > > No. The detectors you talk about can not even exist. > > I challenge you to define these detectors before we go on. > > You cannot believe everything you read. I believe you are subjected to > > misinformation. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > 'Single Photon Interference 'http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~scdiroff/lds/QuantumRelativity/SinglePhot... > > "In this demonstration we perform the double-slit interference > experiment with extremely dim light. Rather than the usual screen, the > arrival of individual photons is registered and stored electronically. > This alone is evidence for the graininess or particle nature of > light." > > The graininess or particle nature of light travels a single path.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - This in no way condones your fancy of photon detectors. If you cannot even face the truth that they do not exist it will be your loss because it is truth. How far can you go in science not correcting yourself? How long will it be before truth catches up to you? Take a correction. There is no way to make these detectors work. If I found your theory to be wrong in one case should I continue to believe you and doubt myself? No. I have enough confidence in my own objectivity to be able to say you have none and are self promoting in science. Were you created to be self promoting? I rest my case. Mitch Raemsch
From: mpc755 on 29 May 2010 21:57
On May 29, 9:54 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On May 29, 6:41 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 29, 9:33 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On May 29, 6:25 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 29, 9:04 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > On May 29, 5:58 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 29, 8:55 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On May 29, 5:50 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On May 29, 8:35 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On May 29, 5:02 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On May 29, 7:52 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 29, 4:26 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 29, 3:33 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 29, 4:28 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 29, 7:21 am, eon <ynes9...(a)techemail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the predictors says that all particles are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > zero size, dimensions disappears ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > no lengths, areas, volumes and space > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > at particles level, say under 100 pico > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so if no volume, no space, no dimensions !!! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > how then does a particle knows in which > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > direction she must travel ??? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i wish i could understand > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by the double solution theory > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Louis de BROGLIE'http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'I called this relation, which determines the particle's motion in the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wave, "the guidance formula". It may easily be generalized to the case > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of an external field acting on the particle.' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'The particle when in motion on its wave, thus has its vibration > > > > > > > > > > > > > > constantly in phase with that of the wave. This result may be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > interpreted by noticing that, in the present theory, the particle is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > de¯ned as a very small region of the wave where the amplitude is very > > > > > > > > > > > > > > large, and it therefore seems quite natural that the internal motion > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rythm of the particle should always be the same as that of the wave at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the point where the particle is located. A very important point must > > > > > > > > > > > > > > be underlined here. For this interpretation of the guidance to be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > acceptable, the dimensions of the minute singular region constituting > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the particle ought to be very small compared to the wavelength of the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > v wave.' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The 'particle' occupies a very small region of its associated wave. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The external field acting on the particle is the aether. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A moving particle has an associated aether wave.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The moving particle and the wave act as one. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > They exist together... > > > > > > > > > > > > > and act as one.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you mean by that? > > > > > > > > > > > They are together. > > > > > > > > > > > Please don't give me repeated text. > > > > > > > > > > > > The aether wave vibrates its particle of energy. An example is a wave > > > > > > > > > > > electron, or a wave proton or a wave neutron. > > > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > > > It's repeated text because de Broglie said it best: > > > > > > > > > > > "The particle when in motion on its wave, thus has its vibration > > > > > > > > > > constantly in phase with that of the wave." > > > > > > > > > > > The particle's vibration constantly in phase with that of the wave is > > > > > > > > > > the particle and the wave acting as one. > > > > > > > > > > > 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics > > > > > > > > > > by the double solution theory > > > > > > > > > > Louis de BROGLIE'http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf > > > > > > > > > > > 'The particle when in motion on its wave, thus has its vibration > > > > > > > > > > constantly in phase with that of the wave. This result may be > > > > > > > > > > interpreted by noticing that, in the present theory, the particle is > > > > > > > > > > de¯ned as a very small region of the wave where the amplitude is very > > > > > > > > > > large, and it therefore seems quite natural that the internal motion > > > > > > > > > > rythm of the particle should always be the same as that of the wave at > > > > > > > > > > the point where the particle is located. A very important point must > > > > > > > > > > be underlined here. For this interpretation of the guidance to be > > > > > > > > > > acceptable, the dimensions of the minute singular region constituting > > > > > > > > > > the particle ought to be very small compared to the wavelength of the > > > > > > > > > > v wave.' > > > > > > > > > > > 'I called this relation, which determines the particle's motion in the > > > > > > > > > > wave, "the guidance formula". It may easily be generalized to the case > > > > > > > > > > of an external field acting on the particle.' > > > > > > > > > > > The 'particle' occupies a very small region of its associated wave. > > > > > > > > > > The external field acting on the particle is the aether.. > > > > > > > > > > > A moving particle has an associated aether wave. > > > > > > > > > > > The particle and the wave act as one.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > There we go. The repeated text. > > > > > > > > > > Subatomic aether waves and point particles of energy exist together. > > > > > > > > > One vibrating the other until it goes inside. This is caused by light > > > > > > > > > flow touch. > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > The moving particle and its associated aether wave exist together. > > > > > > > > They act as one.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > With light around the wave goes inside. That is why it is measured > > > > > > > without a wave at the two slits and it piles up directly behind the > > > > > > > holes at the detection screen. > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > Double slit experiments have been performed with a single photon.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > How do we see it pass through the holes? Does it give off a light of > > > > > its own for us to see? > > > > > NO. > > > > > The photon is detected. If detectors are placed at the entrances to a > > > > No. The detectors you talk about can not even exist. > > > I challenge you to define these detectors before we go on. > > > You cannot believe everything you read. I believe you are subjected to > > > misinformation. > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > 'Single Photon Interference 'http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~scdiroff/lds/QuantumRelativity/SinglePhot... > > > "In this demonstration we perform the double-slit interference > > experiment with extremely dim light. Rather than the usual screen, the > > arrival of individual photons is registered and stored electronically. > > This alone is evidence for the graininess or particle nature of > > light." > > > The graininess or particle nature of light travels a single path.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > This in no way condones your fancy of photon detectors. > > If you cannot even face the truth that they do not exist it will be > your loss because it is truth. > > How far can you go in science not correcting yourself? > How long will it be before truth catches up to you? > > Take a correction. There is no way to make these detectors work. > > If I found your theory to be wrong in one case should I continue to > believe you and doubt myself? No. I have enough confidence in my own > objectivity to be able to say you have none and are self promoting in > science. Were you created to be self promoting? I rest my case. > > Mitch Raemsch "the arrival of individual photons is registered and stored electronically" is the detection of the photon. "the arrival of individual photons is registered and stored electronically" is the detector. |