Zero Size Physics, revisited
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Way off topic: oil and politics (was: Hexagonal grid and itsthree directions)
Next: New Solutions Manuals, Test Banks, Instructor Manuals 2011
From: BURT on 30 May 2010 00:28 On May 29, 9:20 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On May 30, 12:16 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 29, 9:10 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On May 29, 11:38 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > Please I am not searching for the answer I asked you for. > > > > I am not asking for much. > > > > > Define how a particle of light can be detected at a hole while > > > > passing. > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > By placing any of the following detectors at the entrance to the > > > slits. The particle is always detected entering a single slit. > > > This is your fudge. What is it exactly you are placing? > > There is nothing in science that can measure a particle for passing > > light. > > > Please show how such a detector works with a passing light wave or go > > away. > > > Even if you define that I know you are using bunk science. > > There's just enough fudge to make it look like it works. > > Your believability in science is just like that. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > A detector is defined here: > > 'Single Photon Interference'http://www.fas.harvard.edu/ > ~scdiroff/lds/QuantumRelativity/SinglePhotonInterference/ > SinglePhotonInt > erference.html > > and here: > > 'Quantum Information Group, Single Photon Detection'http://www.toshiba- > europe.com/research/crl/qig/singlephotondetection.html > > and here: > > 'A single photon detector inspired by the human eye'http://spie.org/x19173.xml?ArticleID=x19173 > > and here: > > 'Single Photon Detector Conquers The Dark Side'http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/08/030813070545.htm- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - I told you I am not on a wild goose chase to find your detectors of bunk science. I am objective enough to know that science does not know what it is doing. But you are part of the problem by using its fudge for promoting your own theory. For your conscience please show how a detector really is supposed to work. The science you borrow is fudge and you are its missuser. You make claims using its claims and they are both wrong. Mitch Raemsch
From: mpc755 on 30 May 2010 05:55 On May 30, 12:28 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On May 29, 9:20 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 30, 12:16 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On May 29, 9:10 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 29, 11:38 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > Please I am not searching for the answer I asked you for. > > > > > I am not asking for much. > > > > > > Define how a particle of light can be detected at a hole while > > > > > passing. > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > By placing any of the following detectors at the entrance to the > > > > slits. The particle is always detected entering a single slit. > > > > This is your fudge. What is it exactly you are placing? > > > There is nothing in science that can measure a particle for passing > > > light. > > > > Please show how such a detector works with a passing light wave or go > > > away. > > > > Even if you define that I know you are using bunk science. > > > There's just enough fudge to make it look like it works. > > > Your believability in science is just like that. > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > A detector is defined here: > > > 'Single Photon Interference'http://www.fas.harvard.edu/ > > ~scdiroff/lds/QuantumRelativity/SinglePhotonInterference/ > > SinglePhotonInt > > erference.html > > > and here: > > > 'Quantum Information Group, Single Photon Detection'http://www.toshiba- > > europe.com/research/crl/qig/singlephotondetection.html > > > and here: > > > 'A single photon detector inspired by the human eye'http://spie.org/x19173.xml?ArticleID=x19173 > > > and here: > > > 'Single Photon Detector Conquers The Dark Side'http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/08/030813070545.htm-Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > I told you I am not on a wild goose chase to find your detectors of > bunk science. I am objective enough to know that science does not know > what it is doing. But you are part of the problem by using its fudge > for promoting your own theory. > > For your conscience please show how a detector really is supposed to > work. > > The science you borrow is fudge and you are its missuser. You make > claims using its claims and they are both wrong. > > Mitch Raemsch A single photon detector is defined here: 'Single Photon Interference' http://www.fas.harvard.edu/ ~scdiroff/lds/QuantumRelativity/SinglePhotonInterference/ SinglePhotonInt erference.html and here: 'Quantum Information Group, Single Photon Detection' http://www.toshiba- europe.com/research/crl/qig/singlephotondetection.html and here: 'A single photon detector inspired by the human eye' http://spie.org/x19173.xml?ArticleID=x19173 and here: 'Single Photon Detector Conquers The Dark Side' http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/08/030813070545.htm
From: BURT on 30 May 2010 14:11 On May 30, 2:55 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On May 30, 12:28 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 29, 9:20 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On May 30, 12:16 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 29, 9:10 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On May 29, 11:38 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Please I am not searching for the answer I asked you for. > > > > > > I am not asking for much. > > > > > > > Define how a particle of light can be detected at a hole while > > > > > > passing. > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > By placing any of the following detectors at the entrance to the > > > > > slits. The particle is always detected entering a single slit. > > > > > This is your fudge. What is it exactly you are placing? > > > > There is nothing in science that can measure a particle for passing > > > > light. > > > > > Please show how such a detector works with a passing light wave or go > > > > away. > > > > > Even if you define that I know you are using bunk science. > > > > There's just enough fudge to make it look like it works. > > > > Your believability in science is just like that. > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > A detector is defined here: > > > > 'Single Photon Interference'http://www.fas.harvard.edu/ > > > ~scdiroff/lds/QuantumRelativity/SinglePhotonInterference/ > > > SinglePhotonInt > > > erference.html > > > > and here: > > > > 'Quantum Information Group, Single Photon Detection'http://www.toshiba- > > > europe.com/research/crl/qig/singlephotondetection.html > > > > and here: > > > > 'A single photon detector inspired by the human eye'http://spie.org/x19173.xml?ArticleID=x19173 > > > > and here: > > > > 'Single Photon Detector Conquers The Dark Side'http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/08/030813070545.htm-Hidequoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > I told you I am not on a wild goose chase to find your detectors of > > bunk science. I am objective enough to know that science does not know > > what it is doing. But you are part of the problem by using its fudge > > for promoting your own theory. > > > For your conscience please show how a detector really is supposed to > > work. > > > The science you borrow is fudge and you are its missuser. You make > > claims using its claims and they are both wrong. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > A single photon detector is defined here: > > 'Single Photon Interference'http://www.fas.harvard.edu/ > ~scdiroff/lds/QuantumRelativity/SinglePhotonInterference/ > SinglePhotonInt > erference.html > > and here: > > 'Quantum Information Group, Single Photon Detection'http://www.toshiba- > europe.com/research/crl/qig/singlephotondetection.html > > and here: > > 'A single photon detector inspired by the human eye'http://spie.org/x19173.xml?ArticleID=x19173 > > and here: > > 'Single Photon Detector Conquers The Dark Side'http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/08/030813070545.htm- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Please supply how the detector works. I challenge you on that account. Mitch Raemsch
From: mpc755 on 31 May 2010 14:56 On May 30, 1:11 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On May 30, 2:55 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 30, 12:28 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On May 29, 9:20 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 30, 12:16 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > On May 29, 9:10 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 29, 11:38 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Please I am not searching for the answer I asked you for. > > > > > > > I am not asking for much. > > > > > > > > Define how a particle of light can be detected at a hole while > > > > > > > passing. > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > By placing any of the following detectors at the entrance to the > > > > > > slits. The particle is always detected entering a single slit. > > > > > > This is your fudge. What is it exactly you are placing? > > > > > There is nothing in science that can measure a particle for passing > > > > > light. > > > > > > Please show how such a detector works with a passing lightwaveor go > > > > > away. > > > > > > Even if you define that I know you are using bunk science. > > > > > There's just enough fudge to make it look like it works. > > > > > Your believability in science is just like that. > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > A detector is defined here: > > > > > 'Single Photon Interference'http://www.fas.harvard.edu/ > > > > ~scdiroff/lds/QuantumRelativity/SinglePhotonInterference/ > > > > SinglePhotonInt > > > > erference.html > > > > > and here: > > > > > 'Quantum Information Group, Single Photon Detection'http://www.toshiba- > > > > europe.com/research/crl/qig/singlephotondetection.html > > > > > and here: > > > > > 'A single photon detector inspired by the human eye'http://spie.org/x19173.xml?ArticleID=x19173 > > > > > and here: > > > > > 'Single Photon Detector Conquers The Dark Side'http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/08/030813070545.htm-Hidequotedtext - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > I told you I am not on a wild goose chase to find your detectors of > > > bunk science. I am objective enough to know that science does not know > > > what it is doing. But you are part of the problem by using its fudge > > > for promoting your own theory. > > > > For your conscience please show how a detector really is supposed to > > > work. > > > > The science you borrow is fudge and you are its missuser. You make > > > claims using its claims and they are both wrong. > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > A single photon detector is defined here: > > > 'Single Photon Interference'http://www.fas.harvard.edu/ > > ~scdiroff/lds/QuantumRelativity/SinglePhotonInterference/ > > SinglePhotonInt > > erference.html > > > and here: > > > 'Quantum Information Group, Single Photon Detection'http://www.toshiba- > > europe.com/research/crl/qig/singlephotondetection.html > > > and here: > > > 'A single photon detector inspired by the human eye'http://spie.org/x19173.xml?ArticleID=x19173 > > > and here: > > > 'Single Photon Detector Conquers The Dark Side'http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/08/030813070545.htm-Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Please supply how the detector works. I challenge you on that account. > > Mitch Raemsch A single photon detector is defined here: 'Single Photon Interference' http://www.fas.harvard.edu/ ~scdiroff/lds/QuantumRelativity/SinglePhotonInterference/ SinglePhotonInterference.html and here: 'Quantum Information Group, Single Photon Detection' http://www.toshiba- europe.com/research/crl/qig/singlephotondetection.html and here: 'A single photon detector inspired by the human eye' http://spie.org/x19173.xml?ArticleID=x19173 and here: 'Single Photon Detector Conquers The Dark Side' http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/08/030813070545.htm Read the articles to understand how they work.
From: BURT on 31 May 2010 15:00
On May 31, 11:56 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On May 30, 1:11 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 30, 2:55 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On May 30, 12:28 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 29, 9:20 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On May 30, 12:16 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 29, 9:10 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On May 29, 11:38 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Please I am not searching for the answer I asked you for. > > > > > > > > I am not asking for much. > > > > > > > > > Define how a particle of light can be detected at a hole while > > > > > > > > passing. > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > By placing any of the following detectors at the entrance to the > > > > > > > slits. The particle is always detected entering a single slit.. > > > > > > > This is your fudge. What is it exactly you are placing? > > > > > > There is nothing in science that can measure a particle for passing > > > > > > light. > > > > > > > Please show how such a detector works with a passing lightwaveor go > > > > > > away. > > > > > > > Even if you define that I know you are using bunk science. > > > > > > There's just enough fudge to make it look like it works. > > > > > > Your believability in science is just like that. > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > A detector is defined here: > > > > > > 'Single Photon Interference'http://www.fas.harvard.edu/ > > > > > ~scdiroff/lds/QuantumRelativity/SinglePhotonInterference/ > > > > > SinglePhotonInt > > > > > erference.html > > > > > > and here: > > > > > > 'Quantum Information Group, Single Photon Detection'http://www.toshiba- > > > > > europe.com/research/crl/qig/singlephotondetection.html > > > > > > and here: > > > > > > 'A single photon detector inspired by the human eye'http://spie.org/x19173.xml?ArticleID=x19173 > > > > > > and here: > > > > > > 'Single Photon Detector Conquers The Dark Side'http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/08/030813070545.htm-Hidequo...- > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > I told you I am not on a wild goose chase to find your detectors of > > > > bunk science. I am objective enough to know that science does not know > > > > what it is doing. But you are part of the problem by using its fudge > > > > for promoting your own theory. > > > > > For your conscience please show how a detector really is supposed to > > > > work. > > > > > The science you borrow is fudge and you are its missuser. You make > > > > claims using its claims and they are both wrong. > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > A single photon detector is defined here: > > > > 'Single Photon Interference'http://www.fas.harvard.edu/ > > > ~scdiroff/lds/QuantumRelativity/SinglePhotonInterference/ > > > SinglePhotonInt > > > erference.html > > > > and here: > > > > 'Quantum Information Group, Single Photon Detection'http://www.toshiba- > > > europe.com/research/crl/qig/singlephotondetection.html > > > > and here: > > > > 'A single photon detector inspired by the human eye'http://spie.org/x19173.xml?ArticleID=x19173 > > > > and here: > > > > 'Single Photon Detector Conquers The Dark Side'http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/08/030813070545.htm-Hidequoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > Please supply how the detector works. I challenge you on that account. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > A single photon detector is defined here: > > 'Single Photon Interference'http://www.fas.harvard.edu/ > ~scdiroff/lds/QuantumRelativity/SinglePhotonInterference/ > SinglePhotonInterference.html > > and here: > > 'Quantum Information Group, Single Photon Detection'http://www.toshiba- > europe.com/research/crl/qig/singlephotondetection.html > > and here: > > 'A single photon detector inspired by the human eye'http://spie.org/x19173.xml?ArticleID=x19173 > > and here: > > 'Single Photon Detector Conquers The Dark Side'http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/08/030813070545.htm > > Read the articles to understand how they work.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - I am not into following links. Please give a short explanation of how it works. Try doing it yourself. I don't believe what I read on the internet but perhaps I can believe you when you are honest about the detectors. Mitch Raemsch |