asignar hora a PC
in [Debian]
|
Prev: Where does update-initramfs get info?
Next: URL
From: Stan Hoeppner on 28 Apr 2010 18:30 Camaleón put forth on 4/28/2010 4:07 PM: > There is just an interval of *35 seconds* between one mail and the other! > Wow, that is *so fast* if you are sending two different messages (to one > list and the other) because if you carefully review the e-mail headers, > the mailing list address is displayed in "To" field, in both cases. Not > "CC" nor "BCC". This behavior is usually due to working in "off line" mode. Remember waaay back in the dialup days? People would download mail via POP, then reply to all the emails with the results going into the 'outbox', hit 'send', and the client would dial out and send all the queued emails back-to-back. If you look at the xfs mailing list, most devs submit their patches in this queued manner. You'll see 10 or more emails all from the same dev with timestamps only a few seconds apart. Given all of the other things we know about cosme's situation, I think this "dial up" sending behavior is the likely cause of what you describe. There's nothing odd or sinister about it. I don't care for this whole cosme situation as it distracts the list. I wish he'd go away. That said, again, there's nothing suspicious about his quick succession sending. -- Stan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4BD8B4A7.7000406(a)hardwarefreak.com
From: Camaleón on 29 Apr 2010 03:20
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:20:23 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > Camaleón put forth on 4/28/2010 4:07 PM: > >> There is just an interval of *35 seconds* between one mail and the >> other! Wow, that is *so fast* if you are sending two different messages >> (to one list and the other) because if you carefully review the e-mail >> headers, the mailing list address is displayed in "To" field, in both >> cases. Not "CC" nor "BCC". > (...) > Given all of the other things we know about cosme's situation, I think > this "dial up" sending behavior is the likely cause of what you > describe. There's nothing odd or sinister about it. I don't care for > this whole cosme situation as it distracts the list. I wish he'd go > away. That said, again, there's nothing suspicious about his quick > succession sending. Of course there is nothing suspicious in that "low delay" between sendings and that was precisely my point (→ suggests an automated/ configuration error -i.e., mail is automatically duplicated in both lists- instead a manual/conscious error -i.e., the user is manually sending both e-mails-). Maybe one day we'll know :-) Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2010.04.29.07.10.07(a)gmail.com |