From: TTman on

"John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message
news:kqalh59i8jsogn1t6p3ghuaop5c137qtoj(a)4ax.com...
> Testing some FTP stuff, threw up some test files...
>
> ftp://jjlarkin.lmi.net/Core_304bits.jpg
>
> ftp://jjlarkin.lmi.net/Core_4K.jpg
>
> ftp://jjlarkin.lmi.net/Core_4Kdetail.jpg
>
> John
>
>
I remember using those back in the early 70s. Made in Ireland.... 16K and
32K, but I forget the width. It was for a PDP 'clone' that was designed by
some Ex Uni boffins from Sussex. Controller board was a nightmare ( as I
remember), full of 121 and 123 monostables :(
Was used as a CNC controller ( one of the first) on Herbert Machine Tools
in Coventry.
The machine had a 64x24 bit diode microprogram matrix ( replaced by
otproms)and could do x+y+z in one instruction (software, that is), in a few
microsteps...ALU had about 100+ logic chips....
Ahh the good old days.


From: John Larkin on
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009 14:11:00 -0000, "TTman" <someone.pc(a)ntlworld.com>
wrote:

>
>"John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message
>news:kqalh59i8jsogn1t6p3ghuaop5c137qtoj(a)4ax.com...
>> Testing some FTP stuff, threw up some test files...
>>
>> ftp://jjlarkin.lmi.net/Core_304bits.jpg
>>
>> ftp://jjlarkin.lmi.net/Core_4K.jpg
>>
>> ftp://jjlarkin.lmi.net/Core_4Kdetail.jpg
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>I remember using those back in the early 70s. Made in Ireland.... 16K and
>32K, but I forget the width. It was for a PDP 'clone' that was designed by
>some Ex Uni boffins from Sussex. Controller board was a nightmare ( as I
>remember), full of 121 and 123 monostables :(

The first 11, the PDP-11/20, was an asynchronous hairball, like the
PDP-8s. It was full of RCs, delay lines, and bizarre logic paths, and
was all MSI TTL, over 500 packages on two boards, no microcode. There
was a short assembly program that used the paper tape reader to cause
a metastability that totally locked up the CPU. Early 70s was about
when people started getting religion about synchronous logic design.

>Was used as a CNC controller ( one of the first) on Herbert Machine Tools
>in Coventry.
>The machine had a 64x24 bit diode microprogram matrix ( replaced by
>otproms)and could do x+y+z in one instruction (software, that is), in a few
>microsteps...ALU had about 100+ logic chips....
>Ahh the good old days.
>

Actually, I don't miss them all that much.

John

From: John Larkin on
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 14:07:15 +1100, Sylvia Else
<sylvia(a)not.at.this.address> wrote:

>John Larkin wrote:
>> Testing some FTP stuff, threw up some test files...
>>
>> ftp://jjlarkin.lmi.net/Core_304bits.jpg
>>
>> ftp://jjlarkin.lmi.net/Core_4K.jpg
>>
>> ftp://jjlarkin.lmi.net/Core_4Kdetail.jpg
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>
>Many a poor woman's eyesight in the third world ruined making those,
>I'll be bound.
>
>Sylvia.

Do you think that doing close work ruins vision? What about sewing? Or
reading?

John

From: Dirk Bruere at NeoPax on
John Larkin wrote:
> Testing some FTP stuff, threw up some test files...
>
> ftp://jjlarkin.lmi.net/Core_304bits.jpg
>
> ftp://jjlarkin.lmi.net/Core_4K.jpg
>
> ftp://jjlarkin.lmi.net/Core_4Kdetail.jpg

I recall seeing the last one (or two) as examples.
Semis had just taken over.
I assume somebody who later owned a guide dog got to thread them...

--
Dirk

http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK
http://www.theconsensus.org/ - A UK political party
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/onetribe - Occult Talk Show
From: John Larkin on
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009 14:11:00 -0000, "TTman" <someone.pc(a)ntlworld.com>
wrote:

TTman... as in Audi?

John