iPads - SOLD OUT!!!!
in [Mac Systems]
|
Prev: test of Xface
Next: iPad - no HDMI out???!!!
From: White Spirit on 31 Mar 2010 12:21 On 31/03/2010 17:01, Ezekiel wrote: >> It reminds me of the good of days when TSR applications were used to >> fake a multitasking environment. It's nice to see Apple reinventing >> technology that went out in 1993 when the 80386 started to become >> affordable. > If what you say is true then you have nothing to worry about. People > will hate the iPad and reject it in droves. It's a self correcting problem. I'm not worried. I'm just bemused.
From: White Spirit on 31 Mar 2010 12:23 On 31/03/2010 17:10, Hadron wrote: > White Spirit<wspirit(a)homechoice.co.uk> writes: >> It reminds me of the good of days when TSR applications were used to >> fake a multitasking environment. It's nice to see Apple reinventing >> technology that went out in 1993 when the 80386 started to become >> affordable. > I realise you're your own biggest fan, but did you ask yourself WHY a > company famous for innovative and quality product decided to go this > way? Did you? Yep. It seems to me that rehashing the iPhone in a larger package will plug the gap between the iPhone and the Mac without affecting sales of either while taking on the Netbook market at the same time. > NO. You're just interested in blowing your own trumpet and > claiming Apple dont understand multitasking. Do you REALLY believe that? That's not what I said, dishonest one.
From: Rick on 31 Mar 2010 12:30 On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:52:57 -0400, nospam wrote: > In article <G4WdnUiABrYR8y7WnZ2dnUVZ_oMAAAAA(a)supernews.com>, Rick > <none(a)mail.invalid> wrote: > >> Goody goody for changewave's survey. Your statement regarding >> multitasking, "it hasn't bothered anyone on the iphone" is still >> incorrect. > > yet actual users aren't complaining about it. how can that be? One example: New Apple iPhone 4G: No Flash, No Multitasking, Would You Buy it? <http://www.product-reviews.net/2010/03/14/new-apple-iphone-4g-no-flash- no-multitasking-would-you-buy-it/> No (60%, 349 Votes) Yes (40%, 234 Votes) -- Rick
From: chrisv on 31 Mar 2010 12:31 White Spirit wrote: > Hadron quacked: > >> White Spirit writes: > >>> It reminds me of the good of days when TSR applications were used to >>> fake a multitasking environment. It's nice to see Apple reinventing >>> technology that went out in 1993 when the 80386 started to become >>> affordable. > >> I realise you're your own biggest fan, but did you ask yourself WHY a >> company famous for innovative and quality product decided to go this >> way? Did you? > >Yep. It seems to me that rehashing the iPhone in a larger package will >plug the gap between the iPhone and the Mac without affecting sales of >either while taking on the Netbook market at the same time. > >> NO. You're just interested in blowing your own trumpet and >> claiming Apple dont understand multitasking. Do you REALLY believe that? Another Quack bald-faced lie. Documented. No one has claimed "Apple dont understand multitasking". We know very well that Apple made a conscience decision to not support true multitasking in the iPad. >That's not what I said, dishonest one. "Hadron" regularly lies about what advocates claim, trying to use his lies to put advocates on the defensive. "Hadron" is a liar. "Hadron" is a POS.
From: Rick on 31 Mar 2010 12:32
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 18:10:10 +0200, Hadron wrote: > White Spirit <wspirit(a)homechoice.co.uk> writes: > >> On 31/03/2010 16:47, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >> >>> Hadron wrote: >> >>>> Are you under the impression that the iPad will only do one >>>> application at a time? >> >>> It does. No multitasking for external apps. Only internal services >>> multitask >> >> It reminds me of the good of days when TSR applications were used to >> fake a multitasking environment. It's nice to see Apple reinventing >> technology that went out in 1993 when the 80386 started to become >> affordable. > > I realise you're your own biggest fan, but did you ask yourself WHY a > company famous for innovative and quality product decided to go this > way? Did you? NO. You're just interested in blowing your own trumpet and > claiming Apple dont understand multitasking. Do you REALLY believe that? .... Jobs decided it wasn't necessary? ... -- Rick |