From: David Kennedy on 5 Nov 2009 12:14 Jim wrote: > On 2009-11-05, Peter Ceresole<peter(a)cara.demon.co.uk> wrote: >> David Kennedy<davidkennedy(a)nospamherethankyou.invalid> wrote: >> >>> MacSoup does most of the >>> things but has a particularly horrid interface and with most of the >>> others they have a better interface but are not so comprehensive... >> >> I agree that MacSOUP has a fairly lumpen interface, but it seems to me >> that its functions are limited and that once set up they are easily >> learnt. It's certainly not an example of a good UI, but it's certainly >> an example of a good newsreader, which is why I continue to use it. > > Nemo looked promising, but the author seemed to have an on-again/off-again > approach to development, plus he wanted to charge people for betas. > > And now that I look, the old links to it aren't working anymore. > > Jim This is all I could find <http://www.malcom-mac.com/home/?s=nemo> which gives 0.2.9 supposedly released June of this year But lower down - Nemo is Back he says " Nemo is back Finalmente dopo parecchio tempo sono riuscito a pubblicare una nuova build di Nemo. Si tratta della nuova riscrittura, che comprende almeno l�80% del codice totalmente nuovo (a partire dal layer di networking e quello di storage). Iniziano da oggi i lavori di test e debug per la versione 1.0. Trovate maggiori info qui.' i.e. V1.0 of Nemo is under testing... There doesn't seem to be anyway to download any of these versions though. -- David Kennedy http://www.anindianinexile.com
From: Jim on 5 Nov 2009 12:18 On 2009-11-05, David Kennedy <davidkennedy(a)nospamherethankyou.invalid> wrote: > Jim wrote: >> On 2009-11-05, Peter Ceresole<peter(a)cara.demon.co.uk> wrote: >>> David Kennedy<davidkennedy(a)nospamherethankyou.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> MacSoup does most of the >>>> things but has a particularly horrid interface and with most of the >>>> others they have a better interface but are not so comprehensive... >>> >>> I agree that MacSOUP has a fairly lumpen interface, but it seems to me >>> that its functions are limited and that once set up they are easily >>> learnt. It's certainly not an example of a good UI, but it's certainly >>> an example of a good newsreader, which is why I continue to use it. >> >> Nemo looked promising, but the author seemed to have an on-again/off-again >> approach to development, plus he wanted to charge people for betas. >> >> And now that I look, the old links to it aren't working anymore. >> >> Jim > > This is all I could find > ><http://www.malcom-mac.com/home/?s=nemo> > > which gives 0.2.9 supposedly released June of this year > > But lower down - Nemo is Back he says > > " > Nemo is back > > Finalmente dopo parecchio tempo sono riuscito a pubblicare una nuova > build di Nemo. Si tratta della nuova riscrittura, che comprende almeno > l�80% del codice totalmente nuovo (a partire dal layer di networking e > quello di storage). Iniziano da oggi i lavori di test e debug per la > versione 1.0. > Trovate maggiori info qui.' > > i.e. V1.0 of Nemo is under testing... > > There doesn't seem to be anyway to download any of these versions though. > Oh, that's interesting - I wonder if his site was down when I tried, because that's the same link I tried. Jim -- http://www.ursaMinorBeta.co.uk http://twitter.com/GreyAreaUK My Oasis of Calm has dried up. However, my Garden of Angry is flourishing quite nicely.
From: Rowland McDonnell on 5 Nov 2009 12:32 Peter Ceresole <peter(a)cara.demon.co.uk> wrote: > David Kennedy <davidkennedy(a)nospamherethankyou.invalid> wrote: > > > MacSoup does most of the > > things but has a particularly horrid interface and with most of the > > others they have a better interface but are not so comprehensive... > > I agree that MacSOUP has a fairly lumpen interface, I don't - I think it's lovely. It was hard to learn how to use in the first place for reasons that I don't quite understand, but it's elegant and perfectly Mac-like as far as I'm concerned. Where it deviates from `what's normal' adds up to `improved efficiency and user-friendliness', which seems very very Mac like to me - and partly why I call it `elegant'. So maybe it does look out of place on MacOS X. Oh well - it's not like MacOS X is as Mac-like as it should be. [snip] Rowland. -- Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell(a)dog.physics.org Sorry - the spam got to me http://www.mag-uk.org http://www.bmf.co.uk UK biker? Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking
From: Jaimie Vandenbergh on 5 Nov 2009 12:33 On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:14:21 +0000, David Kennedy <davidkennedy(a)nospamherethankyou.invalid> wrote: >This is all I could find > ><http://www.malcom-mac.com/home/?s=nemo> > >which gives 0.2.9 supposedly released June of this year > >But lower down - Nemo is Back he says > >" >Nemo is back > >Finalmente dopo parecchio tempo sono riuscito a pubblicare una nuova >build di Nemo. Si tratta della nuova riscrittura, che comprende almeno >l�80% del codice totalmente nuovo (a partire dal layer di networking e >quello di storage). Iniziano da oggi i lavori di test e debug per la >versione 1.0. >Trovate maggiori info qui.' > >i.e. V1.0 of Nemo is under testing... > >There doesn't seem to be anyway to download any of these versions though. 0.2.9 is under the link labelled {title}, at http://nemox.googlecode.com/files/Nemo_0.2.9.zip Cheers - Jaimie -- Okay, it works now. Or at least it malfunctions in all the expected ways. -- Mark Edwards, asr
From: David Kennedy on 5 Nov 2009 12:51
Jim wrote: > > Oh, that's interesting - I wonder if his site was down when I tried, because > that's the same link I tried. One of his pages - and I forget which, products maybe? - has a mention of things still being moved from another site. -- David Kennedy http://www.anindianinexile.com |