photography documentaries
in [Digital Cameras]
|
From: Wolfgang Weasleburg on 19 Jun 2010 23:01 On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 22:50:13 -0400, "Tim Conway" <tconway_113(a)comcast.net> wrote: > >"sobriquet" <dohduhdah(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >news:d7f7da6c-6223-43b3-95d1-14d9e657911e(a)h13g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... >> On 20 jun, 03:50, "Tim Conway" <tconway_...(a)comcast.net> wrote: >>> "sobriquet" <dohduh...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >>> >>> news:49e45353-aa20-4104-b34e-82848866c3f4(a)b35g2000yqi.googlegroups.com... >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > On 20 jun, 03:37, George Kerby <ghost_top...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >> On 6/19/10 6:56 PM, in article >>> >> 2010061916560844303-savageduck1(a)REMOVESPAMmecom, "Savageduck" >>> >>> >> <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: >>> >> > On 2010-06-19 16:26:52 -0700, George Kerby >>> >> > <ghost_top...(a)hotmail.com> >>> >> > said: >>> >>> >> >> On 6/19/10 11:53 AM, in article >>> >> >> 2010061909533922503-savageduck1(a)REMOVESPAMmecom, "Savageduck" >>> >> >> <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: >>> >>> >> >>> On 2010-06-19 09:46:24 -0700, George Kerby >>> >> >>> <ghost_top...(a)hotmail.com> >>> >> >>> said: >>> >>> >> >>>> On 6/19/10 10:28 AM, in article >>> >> >>>> 2010061908283084492-savageduck1(a)REMOVESPAMmecom, "Savageduck" >>> >> >>>> <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: >>> >>> >> >>>>> On 2010-06-19 03:41:54 -0700, sobriquet <dohduh...(a)yahoo.com> >>> >> >>>>> said: >>> >>> >> >>>>>> ************************************************************************* >>> >> >>>>>> ** >>> >> >>>>>> ** >>> >> >>>>>> By reading and/or replying to this usenet posting, you >>> >> >>>>>> acknowledge >>> >> >>>>>> that you have read, understood and accepted the terms and >>> >> >>>>>> conditions >>> >> >>>>>> found at: >>> >>> >> >>>>>>http://www.ibbu.nl/~nsprakel/eula.txt >>> >>> >> >>>> *************************************************************************** >>> >> >>>> ** >>> >>> >> >>>> * >>> >>> >> >>>>> Nick Sprakel remains a cyber-thief, no matter how much he >>> >> >>>>> protests. >>> >> >>>>> ...and he cannot find his way out of that basement. >>> >>> >> >>>>> <http://picasaweb.google.com/THCganja/Various#5244910721929976050> >>> >> >>>>> <http://picasaweb.google.com/dohduhdah/Experimenteel#5282010159386521810 >>> >>> >> >>>>> I await the nazi name calling so we can invoke Godwin. >>> >>> >> >>>> Gawdamit! Are those creatures still alive?!? >>> >>> >> >>>> Looks like rigor mortis had set in... >>> >>> >> >>> He doesn't see much sunlight does he? >>> >>> >> >> Just occurred to me that it is one and the same. A Kafkian >>> >> >> metamorphosis, of >>> >> >> sorts. >>> >>> >> > A modern Nederlander version of Gregor, now there is food for >>> >> > thought. >>> >> > When unable to meet family responsibility within the stresses of a >>> >> > working life, Gregor becomes a metaphor for an ugly family burden >>> >> > hidden in his bedroom. >>> >> > They are finally released with his death. >>> >>> >> > ...yes I can see how the Metamorphasis analogy with Sobriquet/Nick >>> >> > is >>> >>> >> > very workable. There is probably a family dynamic which keeps him in >>> >> > that cave. >>> >>> >> Not to mention the "cockroach" theme factor that he continually throws >>> >> about. >>> >>> > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, >>> > then you win. >>> > Mohandas Gandhi >>> >>> and then again, you might just incur the wrath of every sane person >>> around >>> you. >> >> Sanity is not something that is determined by popular majority and >> neither is justice. > >But then again, if you take what is mine, I will sue you. And then again, >I'm not necessarily sane. BTW, I am registered as a mentally problematic >child? > Are you this daft? Someone else cannot "take" what you have already given away. Keep it in your pants if you don't want anyone else to have it.
From: tony cooper on 19 Jun 2010 23:44 On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 17:14:21 -0700 (PDT), sobriquet <dohduhdah(a)gmail.com> wrote: >Just because people have a swastika on display, that doesn't imply >they subscribe to the tenets of the national socialist workers party >in former Nazi Germany. > If anyone knows, the Duck knows that if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck that it's probably a duck. -- Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
From: tony cooper on 19 Jun 2010 23:47 On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 19:27:41 -0700 (PDT), sobriquet <dohduhdah(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >So you will finally respect the terms and conditions of my usenet >postings and stay out of my threads? There is no thread until there are replies. Without responses, they are only posts. A thread is a series of posts that are replies to other posts. -- Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
From: Tim Conway on 20 Jun 2010 00:24 "Wolfgang Weasleburg" <wweasleburg(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:211r16t8q3adg90mglceihe7mllo7is6jd(a)4ax.com... > On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 22:50:13 -0400, "Tim Conway" <tconway_113(a)comcast.net> > wrote: > >> >>"sobriquet" <dohduhdah(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >>news:d7f7da6c-6223-43b3-95d1-14d9e657911e(a)h13g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... >>> On 20 jun, 03:50, "Tim Conway" <tconway_...(a)comcast.net> wrote: >>>> "sobriquet" <dohduh...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>> >>>> news:49e45353-aa20-4104-b34e-82848866c3f4(a)b35g2000yqi.googlegroups.com... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> > On 20 jun, 03:37, George Kerby <ghost_top...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >> On 6/19/10 6:56 PM, in article >>>> >> 2010061916560844303-savageduck1(a)REMOVESPAMmecom, "Savageduck" >>>> >>>> >> <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: >>>> >> > On 2010-06-19 16:26:52 -0700, George Kerby >>>> >> > <ghost_top...(a)hotmail.com> >>>> >> > said: >>>> >>>> >> >> On 6/19/10 11:53 AM, in article >>>> >> >> 2010061909533922503-savageduck1(a)REMOVESPAMmecom, "Savageduck" >>>> >> >> <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >> >>> On 2010-06-19 09:46:24 -0700, George Kerby >>>> >> >>> <ghost_top...(a)hotmail.com> >>>> >> >>> said: >>>> >>>> >> >>>> On 6/19/10 10:28 AM, in article >>>> >> >>>> 2010061908283084492-savageduck1(a)REMOVESPAMmecom, "Savageduck" >>>> >> >>>> <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >> >>>>> On 2010-06-19 03:41:54 -0700, sobriquet <dohduh...(a)yahoo.com> >>>> >> >>>>> said: >>>> >>>> >> >>>>>> ************************************************************************* >>>> >> >>>>>> ** >>>> >> >>>>>> ** >>>> >> >>>>>> By reading and/or replying to this usenet posting, you >>>> >> >>>>>> acknowledge >>>> >> >>>>>> that you have read, understood and accepted the terms and >>>> >> >>>>>> conditions >>>> >> >>>>>> found at: >>>> >>>> >> >>>>>>http://www.ibbu.nl/~nsprakel/eula.txt >>>> >>>> >> >>>> *************************************************************************** >>>> >> >>>> ** >>>> >>>> >> >>>> * >>>> >>>> >> >>>>> Nick Sprakel remains a cyber-thief, no matter how much he >>>> >> >>>>> protests. >>>> >> >>>>> ...and he cannot find his way out of that basement. >>>> >>>> >> >>>>> <http://picasaweb.google.com/THCganja/Various#5244910721929976050> >>>> >> >>>>> <http://picasaweb.google.com/dohduhdah/Experimenteel#5282010159386521810 >>>> >>>> >> >>>>> I await the nazi name calling so we can invoke Godwin. >>>> >>>> >> >>>> Gawdamit! Are those creatures still alive?!? >>>> >>>> >> >>>> Looks like rigor mortis had set in... >>>> >>>> >> >>> He doesn't see much sunlight does he? >>>> >>>> >> >> Just occurred to me that it is one and the same. A Kafkian >>>> >> >> metamorphosis, of >>>> >> >> sorts. >>>> >>>> >> > A modern Nederlander version of Gregor, now there is food for >>>> >> > thought. >>>> >> > When unable to meet family responsibility within the stresses of a >>>> >> > working life, Gregor becomes a metaphor for an ugly family burden >>>> >> > hidden in his bedroom. >>>> >> > They are finally released with his death. >>>> >>>> >> > ...yes I can see how the Metamorphasis analogy with Sobriquet/Nick >>>> >> > is >>>> >>>> >> > very workable. There is probably a family dynamic which keeps him >>>> >> > in >>>> >> > that cave. >>>> >>>> >> Not to mention the "cockroach" theme factor that he continually >>>> >> throws >>>> >> about. >>>> >>>> > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, >>>> > then you win. >>>> > Mohandas Gandhi >>>> >>>> and then again, you might just incur the wrath of every sane person >>>> around >>>> you. >>> >>> Sanity is not something that is determined by popular majority and >>> neither is justice. >> >>But then again, if you take what is mine, I will sue you. And then again, >>I'm not necessarily sane. BTW, I am registered as a mentally problematic >>child? >> > > Are you this daft? Someone else cannot "take" what you have already given > away. Keep it in your pants if you don't want anyone else to have it. > I haven't given anything away. Any thing I post is clear that it is what I said and not anyone else's. As per photos, it is implied that they are mine and not to be used without my permission unless stated otherwise. What's so hard to understand about that? I really don't see what all the fighting is all about. Every creative person has a right (there's your human rights for you) to expect that other people respect a person's ability to make a living at his pursuit of art, music, science, or whatever without having to fear that someone is going to come along and usurp respected norms of behavior and confiscate his creation ("intellectual property", as it were). How can I claim to charge a given price for a photo I worked hard to produce if it is suddenly in the public domain and not mine so to speak to have a claim to? Rediculous! Good night!
From: John McWilliams on 20 Jun 2010 00:26
George Kerby wrote: > > Not to mention the "cockroach" theme factor that he continually throws > about. Perhaps he's the personification of several of Kafka's themes. -- john mcwilliams |