photography documentaries
in [Digital Cameras]
|
From: Tim Conway on 20 Jun 2010 00:29 "Wolfgang Weasleburg" <wweasleburg(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:211r16t8q3adg90mglceihe7mllo7is6jd(a)4ax.com... > On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 22:50:13 -0400, "Tim Conway" <tconway_113(a)comcast.net> > wrote: > >> >>"sobriquet" <dohduhdah(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >>news:d7f7da6c-6223-43b3-95d1-14d9e657911e(a)h13g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... >>> On 20 jun, 03:50, "Tim Conway" <tconway_...(a)comcast.net> wrote: >>>> "sobriquet" <dohduh...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>> >>>> news:49e45353-aa20-4104-b34e-82848866c3f4(a)b35g2000yqi.googlegroups.com... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> > On 20 jun, 03:37, George Kerby <ghost_top...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >> On 6/19/10 6:56 PM, in article >>>> >> 2010061916560844303-savageduck1(a)REMOVESPAMmecom, "Savageduck" >>>> >>>> >> <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: >>>> >> > On 2010-06-19 16:26:52 -0700, George Kerby >>>> >> > <ghost_top...(a)hotmail.com> >>>> >> > said: >>>> >>>> >> >> On 6/19/10 11:53 AM, in article >>>> >> >> 2010061909533922503-savageduck1(a)REMOVESPAMmecom, "Savageduck" >>>> >> >> <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >> >>> On 2010-06-19 09:46:24 -0700, George Kerby >>>> >> >>> <ghost_top...(a)hotmail.com> >>>> >> >>> said: >>>> >>>> >> >>>> On 6/19/10 10:28 AM, in article >>>> >> >>>> 2010061908283084492-savageduck1(a)REMOVESPAMmecom, "Savageduck" >>>> >> >>>> <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >> >>>>> On 2010-06-19 03:41:54 -0700, sobriquet <dohduh...(a)yahoo.com> >>>> >> >>>>> said: >>>> >>>> >> >>>>>> ************************************************************************* >>>> >> >>>>>> ** >>>> >> >>>>>> ** >>>> >> >>>>>> By reading and/or replying to this usenet posting, you >>>> >> >>>>>> acknowledge >>>> >> >>>>>> that you have read, understood and accepted the terms and >>>> >> >>>>>> conditions >>>> >> >>>>>> found at: >>>> >>>> >> >>>>>>http://www.ibbu.nl/~nsprakel/eula.txt >>>> >>>> >> >>>> *************************************************************************** >>>> >> >>>> ** >>>> >>>> >> >>>> * >>>> >>>> >> >>>>> Nick Sprakel remains a cyber-thief, no matter how much he >>>> >> >>>>> protests. >>>> >> >>>>> ...and he cannot find his way out of that basement. >>>> >>>> >> >>>>> <http://picasaweb.google.com/THCganja/Various#5244910721929976050> >>>> >> >>>>> <http://picasaweb.google.com/dohduhdah/Experimenteel#5282010159386521810 >>>> >>>> >> >>>>> I await the nazi name calling so we can invoke Godwin. >>>> >>>> >> >>>> Gawdamit! Are those creatures still alive?!? >>>> >>>> >> >>>> Looks like rigor mortis had set in... >>>> >>>> >> >>> He doesn't see much sunlight does he? >>>> >>>> >> >> Just occurred to me that it is one and the same. A Kafkian >>>> >> >> metamorphosis, of >>>> >> >> sorts. >>>> >>>> >> > A modern Nederlander version of Gregor, now there is food for >>>> >> > thought. >>>> >> > When unable to meet family responsibility within the stresses of a >>>> >> > working life, Gregor becomes a metaphor for an ugly family burden >>>> >> > hidden in his bedroom. >>>> >> > They are finally released with his death. >>>> >>>> >> > ...yes I can see how the Metamorphasis analogy with Sobriquet/Nick >>>> >> > is >>>> >>>> >> > very workable. There is probably a family dynamic which keeps him >>>> >> > in >>>> >> > that cave. >>>> >>>> >> Not to mention the "cockroach" theme factor that he continually >>>> >> throws >>>> >> about. >>>> >>>> > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, >>>> > then you win. >>>> > Mohandas Gandhi >>>> >>>> and then again, you might just incur the wrath of every sane person >>>> around >>>> you. >>> >>> Sanity is not something that is determined by popular majority and >>> neither is justice. >> >>But then again, if you take what is mine, I will sue you. And then again, >>I'm not necessarily sane. BTW, I am registered as a mentally problematic >>child? >> > > Are you this daft? Someone else cannot "take" what you have already given > away. Keep it in your pants if you don't want anyone else to have it. Yep, I misspelled ridiculous. Guess what, I think I misspelled misspelled too. Oh my...
From: Tim Conway on 20 Jun 2010 00:32 "John McWilliams" <jpmcw(a)comcast.net> wrote in message news:hvk59c$67q$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > George Kerby wrote: >> >> Not to mention the "cockroach" theme factor that he continually throws >> about. > > Perhaps he's the personification of several of Kafka's themes. I don't know, but I may be a cockroach, but I definitely ain't no Nazi cockroach. Have a good one. Good night.
From: Bill T. on 20 Jun 2010 00:35 On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 23:44:22 -0400, tony cooper <tony_cooper213(a)earthlink.net> wrote: >On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 17:14:21 -0700 (PDT), sobriquet ><dohduhdah(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>Just because people have a swastika on display, that doesn't imply >>they subscribe to the tenets of the national socialist workers party >>in former Nazi Germany. >> >If anyone knows, the Duck knows that if it walks like a duck and >quacks like a duck that it's probably a duck. I guess that's what makes him a proven inept snapshooter too. All his photography proves it. Doesn't matter what photo gear he buys, that fact will never change.
From: Wolfgang Weasleburg on 20 Jun 2010 00:41 On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 00:24:34 -0400, "Tim Conway" <tconway_113(a)comcast.net> wrote: > >I haven't given anything away. Any thing I post is clear that it is what I >said and not anyone else's. As per photos, it is implied that they are mine >and not to be used without my permission unless stated otherwise. What's so >hard to understand about that? I really don't see what all the fighting is >all about. Every creative person has a right (there's your human rights for >you) to expect that other people respect a person's ability to make a living >at his pursuit of art, music, science, or whatever without having to fear >that someone is going to come along and usurp respected norms of behavior >and confiscate his creation ("intellectual property", as it were). How can >I claim to charge a given price for a photo I worked hard to produce if it >is suddenly in the public domain and not mine so to speak to have a claim >to? Rediculous! Good night! > If you ring a bell in the public-square you can't un-ring it. You can't demand after the fact that only those who are willing to pay were allowed to hear it. It's far too late for you to demand anything after you have sent your "intellectual property" across the world via the internet, nor any other avenue of public access. Just be glad if even one person finds your life's effort worth viewing, even once. That's about all it will ever be worth.
From: John McWilliams on 20 Jun 2010 01:46
Tim Conway wrote: > > "John McWilliams" <jpmcw(a)comcast.net> wrote in message > news:hvk59c$67q$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> George Kerby wrote: >>> >>> Not to mention the "cockroach" theme factor that he continually throws >>> about. >> >> Perhaps he's the personification of several of Kafka's themes. > > I don't know, but I may be a cockroach, but I definitely ain't no Nazi > cockroach. Have a good one. Good night. Don' worry none. You can always metamorphose, unlike the psets and trolz that hang out here. == jpmcw |