photography documentaries
in [Digital Cameras]
|
From: Neil on 20 Jun 2010 06:21 On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 09:08:50 -0700, sobriquet wrote: > You are flagrantly violating the terms and conditions of my usenet > postings. > You are obviously a ruthless and vile criminal who belongs in jail for > infringing on other peoples rights.¯€¯‚³'j]È7 I can see that YOU have never read the terms and conditions under which YOU are posting that explicitly state ' that all posting shall be uner complete freedom and politeness with No other conditions imposed or implied'. You are allowed to commit self murder in reply to any posting and I would be pleased if you did. -- Neil - reverse 'ra' and delete 'l'.
From: sobriquet on 20 Jun 2010 06:22 On 20 jun, 05:47, tony cooper <tony_cooper...(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 19:27:41 -0700 (PDT), sobriquet > > <dohduh...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >So you will finally respect the terms and conditions of my usenet > >postings and stay out of my threads? > > There is no thread until there are replies. Without responses, they > are only posts. A thread is a series of posts that are replies to > other posts. > > -- > Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida Well, a posting is just a trivial case of a thread. Just like an empty set or a set with one element is still a set. A thread is a series of one or more posts in a linear or tree structure.
From: sobriquet on 20 Jun 2010 06:31 *************************************************************************** By reading and/or replying to this usenet posting, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and accepted the terms and conditions found at: http://www.ibbu.nl/~nsprakel/eula.txt *************************************************************************** On 20 jun, 12:24, Neil <cral.elllwo...(a)btinternet.com> wrote: > [..] > You do NOT have any of the rights you claim. > > -- > Neil - reverse 'ra' and delete 'l'. Neither do the nazi cockroaches who claim they can publish things online and retain them as intellectual property, allowing them to impose terms and conditions of their preference to restrict the use or access to their creative output.
From: sobriquet on 20 Jun 2010 06:34 *************************************************************************** By reading and/or replying to this usenet posting, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and accepted the terms and conditions found at: http://www.ibbu.nl/~nsprakel/eula.txt *************************************************************************** On 20 jun, 12:21, Neil <cral.elllwo...(a)btinternet.com> wrote: > On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 09:08:50 -0700, sobriquet wrote: > > You are flagrantly violating the terms and conditions of my usenet > > postings. > > You are obviously a ruthless and vile criminal who belongs in jail for > > infringing on other peoples rights. > > I can see that YOU have never read the terms and conditions under which > YOU are posting that explicitly state ' that all posting shall be uner > complete freedom and politeness with No other conditions imposed or > implied'. > > You are allowed to commit self murder in reply to any posting and I would > be pleased if you did. > > -- > Neil - reverse 'ra' and delete 'l'. Where can I find these terms and conditions under which I am supposedly posting? YOU have replied to my posting and that means you acknowledge and agree with the terms and conditions imposed by me.
From: sobriquet on 20 Jun 2010 11:01
On 20 jun, 06:29, "Tim Conway" <tconway_...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > "Wolfgang Weasleburg" <wweasleb...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > > news:211r16t8q3adg90mglceihe7mllo7is6jd(a)4ax.com... > > > > > On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 22:50:13 -0400, "Tim Conway" <tconway_...(a)comcast.net> > > wrote: > > >>"sobriquet" <dohduh...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > >>news:d7f7da6c-6223-43b3-95d1-14d9e657911e(a)h13g2000yqm.googlegroups.com.... > >>> On 20 jun, 03:50, "Tim Conway" <tconway_...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > >>>> "sobriquet" <dohduh...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > > >>>>news:49e45353-aa20-4104-b34e-82848866c3f4(a)b35g2000yqi.googlegroups.com... > > >>>> > On 20 jun, 03:37, George Kerby <ghost_top...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >>>> >> On 6/19/10 6:56 PM, in article > >>>> >> 2010061916560844303-savageduck1(a)REMOVESPAMmecom, "Savageduck" > > >>>> >> <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: > >>>> >> > On 2010-06-19 16:26:52 -0700, George Kerby > >>>> >> > <ghost_top...(a)hotmail.com> > >>>> >> > said: > > >>>> >> >> On 6/19/10 11:53 AM, in article > >>>> >> >> 2010061909533922503-savageduck1(a)REMOVESPAMmecom, "Savageduck" > >>>> >> >> <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: > > >>>> >> >>> On 2010-06-19 09:46:24 -0700, George Kerby > >>>> >> >>> <ghost_top...(a)hotmail.com> > >>>> >> >>> said: > > >>>> >> >>>> On 6/19/10 10:28 AM, in article > >>>> >> >>>> 2010061908283084492-savageduck1(a)REMOVESPAMmecom, "Savageduck" > >>>> >> >>>> <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: > > >>>> >> >>>>> On 2010-06-19 03:41:54 -0700, sobriquet <dohduh...(a)yahoo.com> > >>>> >> >>>>> said: > > >>>> >> >>>>>> ************************************************************************* > >>>> >> >>>>>> ** > >>>> >> >>>>>> ** > >>>> >> >>>>>> By reading and/or replying to this usenet posting, you > >>>> >> >>>>>> acknowledge > >>>> >> >>>>>> that you have read, understood and accepted the terms and > >>>> >> >>>>>> conditions > >>>> >> >>>>>> found at: > > >>>> >> >>>>>>http://www.ibbu.nl/~nsprakel/eula.txt > > >>>> >> >>>> *************************************************************************** > >>>> >> >>>> ** > > >>>> >> >>>> * > > >>>> >> >>>>> Nick Sprakel remains a cyber-thief, no matter how much he > >>>> >> >>>>> protests. > >>>> >> >>>>> ...and he cannot find his way out of that basement. > > >>>> >> >>>>> <http://picasaweb.google.com/THCganja/Various#5244910721929976050> > >>>> >> >>>>> <http://picasaweb.google.com/dohduhdah/Experimenteel#5282010159386521810 > > >>>> >> >>>>> I await the nazi name calling so we can invoke Godwin. > > >>>> >> >>>> Gawdamit! Are those creatures still alive?!? > > >>>> >> >>>> Looks like rigor mortis had set in... > > >>>> >> >>> He doesn't see much sunlight does he? > > >>>> >> >> Just occurred to me that it is one and the same. A Kafkian > >>>> >> >> metamorphosis, of > >>>> >> >> sorts. > > >>>> >> > A modern Nederlander version of Gregor, now there is food for > >>>> >> > thought. > >>>> >> > When unable to meet family responsibility within the stresses of a > >>>> >> > working life, Gregor becomes a metaphor for an ugly family burden > >>>> >> > hidden in his bedroom. > >>>> >> > They are finally released with his death. > > >>>> >> > ...yes I can see how the Metamorphasis analogy with Sobriquet/Nick > >>>> >> > is > > >>>> >> > very workable. There is probably a family dynamic which keeps him > >>>> >> > in > >>>> >> > that cave. > > >>>> >> Not to mention the "cockroach" theme factor that he continually > >>>> >> throws > >>>> >> about. > > >>>> > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, > >>>> > then you win. > >>>> > Mohandas Gandhi > > >>>> and then again, you might just incur the wrath of every sane person > >>>> around > >>>> you. > > >>> Sanity is not something that is determined by popular majority and > >>> neither is justice. > > >>But then again, if you take what is mine, I will sue you. And then again, > >>I'm not necessarily sane. BTW, I am registered as a mentally problematic > >>child? > > > Are you this daft? Someone else cannot "take" what you have already given > > away. Keep it in your pants if you don't want anyone else to have it. > > Yep, I misspelled ridiculous. Guess what, I think I misspelled misspelled > too. Oh my... Don't worry, given your incoherent and nonsensical arguments, your garbled spelling is amongst the least of your worries. First you should strive to master an ability to express your point of view in a fashion that is intelligible to others and then you can gain bonus points for extra credibility if you manage to spell out your ideas flawlessly. I recommend this course in particular: http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/4919006/TTC_VIDEO_-_Argumentation__The_Study_of_Effective_Reasoning_2nd_ |