right handed neutrino
in [Relativity]
|
From: Y.Porat on 3 Apr 2010 13:05 On Apr 3, 3:45 pm, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > On Apr 2, 6:20 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > On Apr 1, 9:04 pm, ganesh <ganeshs...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > hi, > > > The right handed neutrino is a gauge singlet. Hence its > > > superpartner right handed sneutrino should be a candidate for a gauge > > > singlet for the linear term in the superpotential. So, why do we say > > > that MSSM does not have any candidate particle for the linear term in > > > the superpotential > > > > ganesh > > > How does a point rotate? > > It doesn't. > > > And how many degrees of freedom does a point rotate in? > > None. ------------------ imbecile crook bump parasite may be for a change you will start to say not only **what it i s not** but what it is yes or suggestions !!!??? i start to suspect that the Bolshevik pig parrot parasite HAS MORE THEN ONE NAME IN THIS NG !! ..... Y.P -----------------------------
From: BURT on 3 Apr 2010 16:22 On Apr 3, 8:55 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 3, 12:00 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 2, 9:54 pm, dlzc <dl...(a)cox.net> wrote: > > > > Dear BURT: > > > > On Apr 2, 8:14 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 2, 8:07 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) > > > > wrote: > > > > > > BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> writes: > > > > > >On Apr 1, 9:04 pm, ganesh <ganeshs...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> hi, > > > > > >> The right handed neutrino is a gauge > > > > > >> singlet. Hence its superpartner right > > > > > >> handed sneutrino should be a candidate > > > > > >> for a gauge singlet for the linear term > > > > > >> in the superpotential. So, why do we say > > > > > >> that MSSM does not have any candidate > > > > > >> particle for the linear term in the > > > > > >> superpotential > > > > > > >How does a point rotate? > > > > > > It doesn't. > > > > > Spin is changing size of a constant rotation. > > > > No, its not. > > > > > Spin is a wrong concept. Rotation is what > > > > needs to be addressed. > > > > Spin is *not* rotation, BURT.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin_%28physics%29 > > > ... your eternal ignorance needs to be addressed. > > > > David A. Smith- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > An ice skater pulling in her arms does not rotate faster. She spins > > faster. > > Your use of "spin" here STILL doesn't mean what quantum mechanical > spin means. > > > > > Spin has been mistaken for rotation. It is a changing size of an > > unchanging rotation speed. > > No, this is not what quantum mechanical spin is, either. > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - How can a point electron rotate? Spin does not apply to the infinitely small realm of particles. And spin has been mistaken for rotation. Mitch Raemsch
From: bert on 3 Apr 2010 18:24 On Apr 3, 4:22 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Apr 3, 8:55 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 3, 12:00 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On Apr 2, 9:54 pm, dlzc <dl...(a)cox.net> wrote: > > > > > Dear BURT: > > > > > On Apr 2, 8:14 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Apr 2, 8:07 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> writes: > > > > > > >On Apr 1, 9:04 pm, ganesh <ganeshs...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > >> hi, > > > > > > >> The right handed neutrino is a gauge > > > > > > >> singlet. Hence its superpartner right > > > > > > >> handed sneutrino should be a candidate > > > > > > >> for a gauge singlet for the linear term > > > > > > >> in the superpotential. So, why do we say > > > > > > >> that MSSM does not have any candidate > > > > > > >> particle for the linear term in the > > > > > > >> superpotential > > > > > > > >How does a point rotate? > > > > > > > It doesn't. > > > > > > Spin is changing size of a constant rotation. > > > > > No, its not. > > > > > > Spin is a wrong concept. Rotation is what > > > > > needs to be addressed. > > > > > Spin is *not* rotation, BURT.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin_%28physics%29 > > > > ... your eternal ignorance needs to be addressed. > > > > > David A. Smith- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > An ice skater pulling in her arms does not rotate faster. She spins > > > faster. > > > Your use of "spin" here STILL doesn't mean what quantum mechanical > > spin means. > > > > Spin has been mistaken for rotation. It is a changing size of an > > > unchanging rotation speed. > > > No, this is not what quantum mechanical spin is, either. > > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > How can a point electron rotate? > Spin does not apply to the infinitely small realm of particles. > And spin has been mistaken for rotation. > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Spin is rotation Spin of electron cloud is its intrinsic property True quantum spin can have a quantum"twist" If my spinning electron cloud even changed spin speed it would noonger be an electron. Graviton spins twice as fast as photons,or gluons. They have spin 1 graviton spin 2 I have had a theory that spin gives vibrations in the micro realm TreBert
From: BURT on 3 Apr 2010 18:27 On Apr 3, 3:24 pm, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote: > On Apr 3, 4:22 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 3, 8:55 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Apr 3, 12:00 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 2, 9:54 pm, dlzc <dl...(a)cox.net> wrote: > > > > > > Dear BURT: > > > > > > On Apr 2, 8:14 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 2, 8:07 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> writes: > > > > > > > >On Apr 1, 9:04 pm, ganesh <ganeshs...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >> hi, > > > > > > > >> The right handed neutrino is a gauge > > > > > > > >> singlet. Hence its superpartner right > > > > > > > >> handed sneutrino should be a candidate > > > > > > > >> for a gauge singlet for the linear term > > > > > > > >> in the superpotential. So, why do we say > > > > > > > >> that MSSM does not have any candidate > > > > > > > >> particle for the linear term in the > > > > > > > >> superpotential > > > > > > > > >How does a point rotate? > > > > > > > > It doesn't. > > > > > > > Spin is changing size of a constant rotation. > > > > > > No, its not. > > > > > > > Spin is a wrong concept. Rotation is what > > > > > > needs to be addressed. > > > > > > Spin is *not* rotation, BURT.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin_%28physics%29 > > > > > ... your eternal ignorance needs to be addressed. > > > > > > David A. Smith- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > An ice skater pulling in her arms does not rotate faster. She spins > > > > faster. > > > > Your use of "spin" here STILL doesn't mean what quantum mechanical > > > spin means. > > > > > Spin has been mistaken for rotation. It is a changing size of an > > > > unchanging rotation speed. > > > > No, this is not what quantum mechanical spin is, either. > > > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > How can a point electron rotate? > > Spin does not apply to the infinitely small realm of particles. > > And spin has been mistaken for rotation. > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Spin is rotation Spin of electron cloud is its intrinsic property > True quantum spin can have a quantum"twist" If my spinning electron > cloud even changed spin speed it would noonger be an electron. > Graviton spins twice as fast as photons,or gluons. They have spin 1 > graviton spin 2 I have had a theory that spin gives vibrations in > the micro realm TreBert- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Rotation is constant while spin changes sizes. Mitch Raemsch
From: Michael Moroney on 3 Apr 2010 18:50
BURT <macromitch(a)yahoo.com> writes: >> Your use of "spin" here STILL doesn't mean what quantum mechanical >> spin means. >> >> > Spin has been mistaken for rotation. It is a changing size of an >> > unchanging rotation speed. >> >> No, this is not what quantum mechanical spin is, either. >> >How can a point electron rotate? >Spin does not apply to the infinitely small realm of particles. >And spin has been mistaken for rotation. Didn't you even read the post you replied to? Quantum mechanical "spin" doesn't mean physical spinning or rotation. So the question how a point can rotate is meaningless. Do you think "colored" quarks are actually red, green or blue? Or have "flavors" that you can taste? |