right handed neutrino
in [Relativity]
|
From: BURT on 2 Apr 2010 18:20 On Apr 1, 9:04 pm, ganesh <ganeshs...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > hi, > The right handed neutrino is a gauge singlet. Hence its > superpartner right handed sneutrino should be a candidate for a gauge > singlet for the linear term in the superpotential. So, why do we say > that MSSM does not have any candidate particle for the linear term in > the superpotential > > ganesh How does a point rotate? And how many degrees of freedom does a point rotate in? Mitch Raemsch
From: Michael Moroney on 2 Apr 2010 23:07 BURT <macromitch(a)yahoo.com> writes: >On Apr 1, 9:04 pm, ganesh <ganeshs...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> hi, >> The right handed neutrino is a gauge singlet. Hence its >> superpartner right handed sneutrino should be a candidate for a gauge >> singlet for the linear term in the superpotential. So, why do we say >> that MSSM does not have any candidate particle for the linear term in >> the superpotential >> >> ganesh >How does a point rotate? It doesn't.
From: BURT on 2 Apr 2010 23:14 On Apr 2, 8:07 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote: > BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> writes: > >On Apr 1, 9:04 pm, ganesh <ganeshs...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> hi, > >> The right handed neutrino is a gauge singlet. Hence its > >> superpartner right handed sneutrino should be a candidate for a gauge > >> singlet for the linear term in the superpotential. So, why do we say > >> that MSSM does not have any candidate particle for the linear term in > >> the superpotential > > >> ganesh > >How does a point rotate? > > It doesn't. Spin is changing size of a constant rotation. Spin is a wrong concept. Rotation is what needs to be addressed. Mitch Raemsch
From: dlzc on 3 Apr 2010 00:54 Dear BURT: On Apr 2, 8:14 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Apr 2, 8:07 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) > wrote: > > > BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> writes: > > >On Apr 1, 9:04 pm, ganesh <ganeshs...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >> hi, > > >> The right handed neutrino is a gauge > > >> singlet. Hence its superpartner right > > >> handed sneutrino should be a candidate > > >> for a gauge singlet for the linear term > > >> in the superpotential. So, why do we say > > >> that MSSM does not have any candidate > > >> particle for the linear term in the > > >> superpotential > > > >How does a point rotate? > > > It doesn't. > > Spin is changing size of a constant rotation. No, its not. > Spin is a wrong concept. Rotation is what > needs to be addressed. Spin is *not* rotation, BURT. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin_%28physics%29 .... your eternal ignorance needs to be addressed. David A. Smith
From: BURT on 3 Apr 2010 01:00
On Apr 2, 9:54 pm, dlzc <dl...(a)cox.net> wrote: > Dear BURT: > > On Apr 2, 8:14 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 2, 8:07 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) > > wrote: > > > > BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> writes: > > > >On Apr 1, 9:04 pm, ganesh <ganeshs...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> hi, > > > >> The right handed neutrino is a gauge > > > >> singlet. Hence its superpartner right > > > >> handed sneutrino should be a candidate > > > >> for a gauge singlet for the linear term > > > >> in the superpotential. So, why do we say > > > >> that MSSM does not have any candidate > > > >> particle for the linear term in the > > > >> superpotential > > > > >How does a point rotate? > > > > It doesn't. > > > Spin is changing size of a constant rotation. > > No, its not. > > > Spin is a wrong concept. Rotation is what > > needs to be addressed. > > Spin is *not* rotation, BURT.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin_%28physics%29 > ... your eternal ignorance needs to be addressed. > > David A. Smith- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - An ice skater pulling in her arms does not rotate faster. She spins faster. Spin has been mistaken for rotation. It is a changing size of an unchanging rotation speed. Mitch Raemsch |