From: Jolly Roger on
In article <7ugj6aFntkU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
TaliesinSoft <taliesinsoft(a)me.com> wrote:

> On 2010-02-22 16:07:29 -0600, Jim Gibson said:
>
> > In article <here-8FB6CA.22251717022010(a)news.central.cox.net>, Mike
> > <here(a)there.org> wrote:
> >
> >> My niece needs some aid in finding a software package to build web
> >> pages. She's a beginner - she's gotten a part time job with a state
> >> legislator who needs her to build a web page. I did some Googling but I
> >> don't know anything about it so I don't know what to tell her.
> >>
> >> Any suggestions are appreciated.
> >
> > Dreamweaver from Adobe is probably the state of the art in commercial
> > web-building packages. It is expensive, and has a steep learning curve,
> > but if her employer can afford to pay her he can afford software for
> > her. It runs on Windows and Mac. She should also look for a Dreamweaver
> > course to take.
>
> And then there is Freeway (which comes in a Pro and an Express version)
> which is far easier for a novice to learn as it requires absolutely no
> knowledge of HTML and such. And also, Freeway will produce W3C
> compliant code, something which tends to not be true with other website
> development packages.

Interestingly, Freeway was mentioned, yet ignored, several times in this
thread.

--
Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me.
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM
filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting
messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google
Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts.

JR
From: dorayme on
In article <220220101407291358%jimsgibson(a)gmail.com>,
Jim Gibson <jimsgibson(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> In article <here-8FB6CA.22251717022010(a)news.central.cox.net>, Mike
> <here(a)there.org> wrote:
>
> > My niece needs some aid in finding a software package to build web
> > pages. She's a beginner - she's gotten a part time job with a state
> > legislator who needs her to build a web page. I did some Googling but I
> > don't know anything about it so I don't know what to tell her.
> >
> > Any suggestions are appreciated.
>
> Dreamweaver from Adobe is probably the state of the art in commercial
> web-building packages. It is expensive, and has a steep learning curve,
> but if her employer can afford to pay her he can afford software for
> her. It runs on Windows and Mac. She should also look for a Dreamweaver
> course to take.

Dreamweaver is the very last thing that should be suggested for a
beginner.

--
dorayme
From: Jim Gibson on
In article <doraymeRidThis-9721A4.11402623022010(a)news.albasani.net>,
dorayme <doraymeRidThis(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote:

> In article <220220101407291358%jimsgibson(a)gmail.com>,
> Jim Gibson <jimsgibson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <here-8FB6CA.22251717022010(a)news.central.cox.net>, Mike
> > <here(a)there.org> wrote:
> >
> > > My niece needs some aid in finding a software package to build web
> > > pages. She's a beginner - she's gotten a part time job with a state
> > > legislator who needs her to build a web page. I did some Googling but I
> > > don't know anything about it so I don't know what to tell her.
> > >
> > > Any suggestions are appreciated.
> >
> > Dreamweaver from Adobe is probably the state of the art in commercial
> > web-building packages. It is expensive, and has a steep learning curve,
> > but if her employer can afford to pay her he can afford software for
> > her. It runs on Windows and Mac. She should also look for a Dreamweaver
> > course to take.
>
> Dreamweaver is the very last thing that should be suggested for a
> beginner.

Which is why I suggested it after all the other suggestions had been
made :)

Seriously, I would recommend a professional package as opposed to
freeware. I don't know anything about Freeway, but I would think that a
politician would need a professionally-built website that can be
maintained for a long time and adhere to changing web standards. That
is not to say it couldn't be done with Freeway or any other free or
cheap package (Sea Monkey, iWeb), but I would think that those software
packages are not as capable as Dreamweaver.

I don't particularly like Dreamweaver, but it is full of features and
has the advantage of being widely-used so that help in the form of
books and courses are available. The OP is looking for suggestions, not
just recommendations.

I have a friend who is not a programmer and knows little about HTML but
learned Dreamweaver from a community college course and put together a
very professional looking website. It mostly depends upon the aptitude
of the learner.

--
Jim Gibson
From: dorayme on
In article <220220101755459205%jimsgibson(a)gmail.com>,
Jim Gibson <jimsgibson(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> In article <doraymeRidThis-9721A4.11402623022010(a)news.albasani.net>,
> dorayme <doraymeRidThis(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>
> > In article <220220101407291358%jimsgibson(a)gmail.com>,
> > Jim Gibson <jimsgibson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > In article <here-8FB6CA.22251717022010(a)news.central.cox.net>, Mike
> > > <here(a)there.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > My niece needs some aid in finding a software package to build web
> > > > pages. She's a beginner - she's gotten a part time job with a state
> > > > legislator who needs her to build a web page. I did some Googling but I
> > > > don't know anything about it so I don't know what to tell her.
> > > >
> > > > Any suggestions are appreciated.
> > >
> > > Dreamweaver from Adobe is probably the state of the art in commercial
> > > web-building packages. ...
> >
> > Dreamweaver is the very last thing that should be suggested for a
> > beginner.
>
> Which is why I suggested it after all the other suggestions had been
> made :)
>
> Seriously, I would recommend a professional package as opposed to
> freeware. I don't know anything about Freeway, but I would think that a
> politician would need a professionally-built website that can be
> maintained for a long time and adhere to changing web standards. That
> is not to say it couldn't be done with Freeway or any other free or
> cheap package (Sea Monkey, iWeb), but I would think that those software
> packages are not as capable as Dreamweaver.
>

A beginner would not know what capabilities were what for
possibly years. The reason a program like Dreamweaver is a bad
idea for a beginner is slightly similar to the reason an
inexperienced rider should not get the biggest and most powerful
motor bike straight off.

To use DW to advantage, it really helps to understand HTML and
CSS. In other words, it is best in the hands of those who do not
absolutely need it. Some of its functions, in experienced hands,
can save time.


> I don't particularly like Dreamweaver, but it is full of features and
> has the advantage of being widely-used so that help in the form of
> books and courses are available. The OP is looking for suggestions, not
> just recommendations.
>

Nothing wrong with making suggestions, Jim. <g>

I would suggest quite a different course. Get an experienced
developer to supply a content management system website (eg.
someone competent in Drupal). The niece will have plenty of work
to instruct the developer, approving and disapproving designs and
initial content. Plus, with CMS, she will be able to make her own
inputs with simple tools (no need to learn HTML or CSS now). Now
and in the future, she will have many editing functions and
online too!

--
dorayme
From: TaliesinSoft on
On 2010-02-22 18:03:59 -0600, Jolly Roger said:

[responding to my recommendation of Freeway as a website development program]

> Interestingly, Freeway was mentioned, yet ignored, several times in this
> thread.

To me, developing a website with Freeway is somewhat like developing a
slideshow in Keylnote. One works in a visual environment and works with
objects and associated actions. There are some good demonstration
videos on the Softpress (the developers of Freeway) website at
<www.softpress.com>.

As an aside, the Softpress website itself was developed in Freeway and
passes he W3C validation with 0 errors. I'm not sure just what was used
to develop the Adobe website but it produces 23 errors with the W3C
validation.

--
James Leo Ryan --- Austin, Texas --- taliesinsoft(a)me.com