Prev: Tiny Bootloader
Next: Link&Locate 86?
From: steve on 6 Sep 2006 12:45 Joerg wrote: > Hello Steve, > > > > >>Another thought is about what you want to do with it and whether the mfg > >>supplies enough info for the task at hand. For example, twice I had > >>considered the MSP430 because it would have been a glove fit but I was > >>unable to crank details about the DCO and port drivers/receivers out of > >>TI. > > > > or even basic A/D info > > > > Amen! > > That info, or rather the lack of it, is probably going to sink TI's next > potential design-win. There just isn't enough data for the F2013's 16bit > converter. so how do think other engineers design MSP430 products without this info? Same problem with the AVR datasheets. Design by experimentation is a poor design method, in my book...
From: linnix on 6 Sep 2006 12:56 Yuriy K. wrote: > Joerg wrote: > > > Except for field failures or the occasional fatalities. Look at > > electronics in automotive. I'd never buy a car with dozens of > > controllers. > > Still driving old carb. engine around? 8-[] > > > A lot of stuff actually does not get better but worse. PC software is > > just one example. > > Very good example. I vote for today's software over any 10-years old. > And definitely over any 25-years old software... Sometimes, older stuffs are better. On my desk, there are lots of developments tools connected to the windown 98 pc via rs232. At a corner, there is a MSP430 development kits (require XP/USB) sitting there, waiting for one of two things: 1. I upgrade to XP or 2. TI downgrade to Win98/rs232. I don't see either one happening soon.
From: Frank Bemelman on 6 Sep 2006 13:21 "Joerg" <notthisjoergsch(a)removethispacbell.net> schreef in bericht news:OniLg.8131$yO7.1189(a)newssvr14.news.prodigy.com... > A lot of stuff actually does not get better but worse. PC software is just > one example. Another classic: I have fixed numerous devices that I needed > but that were unreliable because of a dirty reset. The "design engineers" > couldn't even design a proper reset. Pathetic. I never had to do that. The gadgets I buy just work. I must be shopping in other places than you. >> Buy and open a dozen of random industrial black boxes and show >> me where the 8051 is. You'll be *very* lucky if you find one >> or two. >> > > I don't have to buy anything but just stroll down the stairs here to show > you the first one. There is a pellet heater which needs to be serviced > once a season. I often do that myself. Guess what's timing all the motors > in there? Ye olde 8051. And is that 'Ye olde' pellet heater too? It must be ;) > Then there are a few medical devices with 8051 and the way it's going it > seems their production life will exceed that of many car models. Designed > by yours truly :-) How long ago did you design it? 20 years ago there was little other choice than 8051. It was already sort of a microcontroller, even though it needs external ram/rom. Ten years ago - still a valid choice, but the arena is getting smaller and smaller for the 8051. I agree it can still be a very valid choice today, for typically very less demanding tasks. Like a pellet heater. Damn if I know what a pellet heater is. > Jim mentioned that the 80C51 runs around a billion/year. Where do you > think these are going? Is someone eating them? A billion. With such large numbers and nothing to compare it against, I don't know if I should be impressed or not. Maybe a booming sales in pellet heaters is the cause of all this. -- Thanks, Frank. (remove 'q' and '.invalid' when replying by email)
From: Robert Adsett on 6 Sep 2006 13:35 Frank Bemelman wrote: > How long ago did you design it? 20 years ago there was little > other choice than 8051. It was already sort of a microcontroller, > even though it needs external ram/rom. Ten years ago - still > a valid choice, but the arena is getting smaller and smaller > for the 8051. I agree it can still be a very valid choice today, > for typically very less demanding tasks. Like a pellet heater. > Damn if I know what a pellet heater is. A rabbit dropping sterilizer? ;) Robert
From: Joerg on 6 Sep 2006 15:30
Hello Jim, >> BTW, I am still designing with CD4000 logic despite the fact that some >> sales people told me in the early 90's that this logic series in >> almost dead. Then the mfgs ported it to small SMT packages. Now those >> sales guys are a little more cautious with such bold "gut feeling" >> statements or wishful thinking. >> >> They initially wanted me to switch to "modern" logic chips. Then I >> told them "Yeah, if you can point out at least two other manufacturers >> as sources and drop the price to less than 1.5 cents per inverter". > > plus it's not only price - we spec HEF40106 devices, where they are the > best technical solution. Often you do not want the fastest gate on the > planet, and some noise immnity and delay is a good thing :) > The 40106 is one of my favorites. Consequently, my clients now buy tons of them. One of the advantages of this series is the huge supply voltage range, doing away with the need for voltage regulation in most designs. -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com |