From: Jim Granville on
Bill Giovino wrote:

> The 8051 market saw it's first hit ever with
> ARM's acquisition of Keil, as ARM's own public analyst statements clearly show that
> their strategy is to move 8051 users into ARM.

Well, ARM have to try and talk up their brand, and they _have_ brought
the addresses of all the Keil customers, and doubtless will spam them,
but I doubt it will change designers' decision process a whole lot.
The core matters less and less, over time : other factors dominate
selection. Peripherals, Flash Size, Speed, Pin Count...
( and that has to concern ARM )

-jg


From: Ian Bell on
Jim Granville wrote:
>
> 80C51's are over 1 billion / year, and microchip is approaching that,
> but only if they fudge things by pretending all their PIC cores are the
> same :)
>

Another intersting anecdote - can you point to a reference?


> PICs would own the low-pin-count, Low IQ, business, and the low ASP of
> PICs shows how many rice-grains they ship. - and also shows how slow
> takeup has been on PIC18 and dsPIC.
>
> However, the 80C51 is now moving into the low-pin-count territory, as is
> the AVR, and Zilog et al, so their base-segment is getting more crowded.
> eg at 20 pins, you now have 16K Flash 80C51 variants.
>
> Microchip's analog business is growing faster than their uC's.
>

References for the above?


>>
>>>The AVR does not make it into this most... list, yet but it is
>>>definitely a another "force" in the 8-bit.
>>
>>
>> Interesting because I found a news item from just a few years ago that
>> claimed the AVR had 30% of the 8 bit market.
>
> That was carefull spin - it was not 30% of the 8 bit, but 30% of the
> flash 8 bit, at _that_ time, and by volume.

Why am I not surprised.

Ian
From: Jim Granville on
Ian Bell wrote:
> Jim Granville wrote:
>
>>80C51's are over 1 billion / year, and microchip is approaching that,
>>but only if they fudge things by pretending all their PIC cores are the
>>same :)
>>
>
>
> Another intersting anecdote - can you point to a reference?

Can't recall where I saw that, but it is probably including smart cards
with 80c51 cores.

>
>>PICs would own the low-pin-count, Low IQ, business, and the low ASP of
>>PICs shows how many rice-grains they ship. - and also shows how slow
>>takeup has been on PIC18 and dsPIC.
>>
>>However, the 80C51 is now moving into the low-pin-count territory, as is
>>the AVR, and Zilog et al, so their base-segment is getting more crowded.
>>eg at 20 pins, you now have 16K Flash 80C51 variants.
>>
>>Microchip's analog business is growing faster than their uC's.
>>
>
>
> References for the above?

ASP, Flash % of shipments, and relative growths are all in Microchips
Annual reports (or derived from those numbers). As are development
systems, which is another good reality check - tho these numbers look to
mean any downloads as a shipped system.

-jg


From: steve on

Joerg wrote:

> Another thought is about what you want to do with it and whether the mfg
> supplies enough info for the task at hand. For example, twice I had
> considered the MSP430 because it would have been a glove fit but I was
> unable to crank details about the DCO and port drivers/receivers out of
> TI.

or even basic A/D info

From: Eric on
Jim Granville wrote:

> Zilog is doing some smart things...

Their ZNEO looks promising, and they just announced that their IDE and
C compiler are now free (I guess this applies to all their target
families). For the life of me, I can't understand why chip makers
haven't done this sooner.

Microchip was one of the first to give away their IDE, but that didn't
include a C compiler. Atmel's newly enhanced gcc support in their AVR
IDE is a nice touch (their debugger is particularly nice as an
alternative to the commandline gdb), but Zilog is the first company I
know of to give away a commerial C compiler and IDE with no code size
limits.

I hope this signals a trend in the industry. Chip-makers need to figure
out if their primary business is selling chips, or IDEs. Giving away
software tools has always seemed like a no-brainer to me. If I were a
chip-maker I'd also give away good libs to support my on-chip
peripherals...

Eric

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Prev: Tiny Bootloader
Next: Link&Locate 86?