911 and the Demo Truth
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Intermediate Accounting 12th and 13th edition Kieso Weygandt
Next: JSH: Back to conic section parameterization result
From: AllYou! on 16 Oct 2009 08:36 In news:hb9nuj$jb$8(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: > Al Dykes wrote: > >> Gage speaks for 2-2/1 hours and says 100 stupid things. > > Can you quote and refute one of these "things" for us? > Here's an example of how to quote something incredibly > stupid. It was written by you. > >>> Do you actually believe that if supports on only one side of >>> a tall building are destroyed, the building will drop straight >>> down onto its own footprint? > >> Yes. > > Who do you "think" faked all the photos and videos Prove they were faked. > showing > tall buildings topping sideways, and why do you "think" they > did it? So it's your claim that the WTC buildings exhibited "all the characteristics of a controlled demolition", except for the ways in which it didn't )E.G., toppling vs. straight fall, ETC, ETC, ETC.....). Is that your position?
From: Henry on 16 Oct 2009 09:23 AllYou! wrote: > Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: >> AllYou! wrote: >>> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: >>>> AllYou! wrote: >>>>> Actually, all the quotes you've provided so far are that they >>>>> called it molten metal. Why would you now lie about that? >>>> You're lying and being very stupid and illiterate again, nut >>>> job. Here are two of the quotes that you failed to comprehend >>>> because you're barely literate and you're insane. >>>> "The structural engineer responsible for the design of the WTC, >>>> described fires still burning and molten steel still running 21 >>>> days after the attacks." >>> He was there? >> One step at a time for you, nut job. You said that no one >> quoted mentioned molten steel, and that by claiming they did, >> I was lying. Do you now see you were dead wrong again and that >> you're a lying, insane nut job? > Why so much anger? You're mistaking mild amusement for anger, nut job. Were you able to find the words "molten steel" in the quotes yet, nut job? You said all the quotes referred to molten metal, and that I was lying when I said some referred to molten steel. You were lying and being very stupid and illiterate again, nut job. > Why so afraid? Your ignorance, stupidity, illiteracy, and lies are amusing and they prove my point, nut job. That's not frightening - it's comforting and amusing. Can you find the words "molten steel" in that quote, nut job? You said they weren't used. They are. Can you see them, nut job? > You are the one who said it, not me. I said the eyewitnesses used the words "molten steel". They did. It's in the quotes. Did you find the words "molten steel" in the quotes yet, nut job? You lied again, nut job. >>>> "A witness said "In the first few weeks, sometimes when a >>>> worker would pull a steel beam from the wreckage, the end of >>>> the beam would be dripping molten steel"." >>> How does that worker know the difference between molten steel, >>> and molten metal other than steel? >> One step at a time for you, nut job. > OK, your refusal to back up your claims is noted. Can you find the words "molten steel" in that quote, nut job? You said they weren't used. They were. Can you see them, nut job? <chuckle> -- http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.ae911truth.org
From: Henry on 16 Oct 2009 09:38 AllYou! wrote: > Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: >> AllYou! wrote: >>> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: >>>>>> Here are two of our 9-11 rescue heroes who observed molten >>>>>> metal "flowing like lava - like a "foundry" <link restored because we can't afford to let freedom, truth, justice and America hating extremists or nut jobs hide the truth and evidence> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCdRA09pztM >>>>> Lava flows in foundries? >>>> No one has said that but you, nut job. Learn how to read and >>>> think, nut job. >>> You did. You just said that it looked like flowing lava like a >>> foundry. >> Wrong nut job, I quoted FDNY members who compared it to >> lava and a foundry. > Ahhhhhhhhh. Close your mouth and stop drooling, nut job. It's unseemly. >> No one but you said that lava flows >> in a foundry, nut job. You are quite clearly insane. > Actually, you did. But of course, you can't produce that quote because no such quote exists, and you're a deluded, lying, insane nut job. Thanks for proving my point, even though it wasn't quite what you had in "mind". <chuckle> -- http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.ae911truth.org
From: Henry on 16 Oct 2009 09:42 AllYou! wrote: > In news:hb9nub$jb$7(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, > Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: >> AllYou! wrote: >>> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: >>>> AllYou! wrote: >>>>> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: >>>>>> How else do you explain >>>>>> the molten metal that flowed like lava, >>>>> Lead, aluminum, copper, and any other substances that could >>>>> look 'like' lava as much as metal does. >>>> So, you "think" the structural steel in the towers and WTC7 >>>> was made of lead, aluminum, and copper, eh? Good "thinking", >>>> nut job... >>> You're using your conclusion that the molten metal was steel in >>> order to prove that the steel was melted. The fact is that >>> there's no evidence whatsoever that the molten stuff that >>> someone said that they think they saw was steel at all. >> Actually, I'm relying on photo and eyewitness evidence, nut job. > How do they know that it was metal at all Since it was dripping from super heated brightly glowing steel beams, what else do you "think" it could have been, nut job? Molten subterranean aliens? Are you insane? Rhetorical, by the way - look it up... <chuckle> -- http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.ae911truth.org
From: Al Dykes on 16 Oct 2009 11:23
In article <0ff4945e-e613-40ec-ab00-0e58ed4e60a2(a)y10g2000prg.googlegroups.com>, <knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >On Oct 13, 11:28=A0am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: >> In article <5a966551-b3ca-4131-ad75-c5e08f4f5...(a)b25g2000prb.googlegroups= >.com>, >> >> >> >> >> >> =A0<knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >On Oct 13, 7:36=3DA0am, Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> On Oct 13, 8:05=3DA0am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: >> >> >> > Iarnrod wrote: >> >> > > There is no force on planet Earth that could divert that 30-story >> >> > > upper block sideways that far. >> >> >> > =3DA0 Observe the rotating and disintegrating block on the South >> >> > Tower. >> >> >> I'd have to have some of the hallucinogens you use, >> >> >So you didn't see the top of tower 2 break, start to fall to one side, >> >then didappear into a dust cloud? >> >Get your seeing eye dog to help you. >> >> >>Self-Admitted >> >> Fired Janitor, in order to see something that is not actually present. >> >> <chuckle> >> >> >Janitors know a lot about buildings. >> >Spooks on the other hand only know how to lie and spew. >> >Why are you denying the reality right before your eyes? >> >Is someone holding a gun to your head? >> >> >> Let us know when you have something that actually supports any one of >> >> your rightard fantasies, Hankie. >> >> >How do 30 floors disintergate into dust in 3 seconds? >> >> You are looking at smoke and dust from the break-up of sheet rock and >> concrete. >From what mechanism dust it turn to dust in micron sizes? >Why does cement on steel decking turn to dust? >Why did NIST drop their "pancake" theory? > >>No steel "disintigrated". WTC was mostly steel. >> >I didn't say it did (you put in your SpookSpeak) but experts have >found the evidence that some did in the dust analysis. >http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/= >7TOCPJ.SGM > >> >How does =A0toppling top section fall into the most resistant part of >> >> Gravity works that way. >> >Liar. >Gravity follows the "path of least resistance" according to the Laws Wrong. Gravity on earth always points to the center of the planet. Which planet are you on? There is no such law or principle of "path of least resistance". For electricity or water, if such a law was in operation, only th faucet or bulb closest to the source would work. -- Al Dykes News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising. - Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail |