911 and the Demo Truth
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Intermediate Accounting 12th and 13th edition Kieso Weygandt
Next: JSH: Back to conic section parameterization result
From: Henry on 19 Oct 2009 12:06 AllYou! wrote: > So you disagree with your whacko friend here? You're not my friend, hut job, and of course I disagree with your insane nut job conspiracy lies, nut job. >> I said the eyewitnesses used the words "molten steel". > And I asked you to show No, you said they all used the words molten metal, nut job. You said my claim that they said "molten steel" was a lie, nut job. Here'ws your quote: "Actually, all the quotes you've provided so far are that they called it molten metal. Why would you now lie about that?" Why do you lie so often, nut job? Are you insane? Rhetorical, btw, look it up... <chuckle> >>>> You're lying and being very stupid and illiterate again, nut >>>> job. Here are two of the quotes that you failed to comprehend >>>> because you're barely literate and you're insane. >>>> "The structural engineer responsible for the design of the WTC, >>>> described fires still burning and molten steel still running 21 >>>> days after the attacks." >>> He was there? >> One step at a time for you, nut job. You said that no one >> quoted mentioned molten steel, and that by claiming they did, >> I was lying. Do you now see you were dead wrong again and that >> you're a lying, insane nut job? > Why so much anger? You're mistaking mild amusement for anger, nut job. Were you able to find the words "molten steel" in the quotes yet, nut job? You said all the quotes referred to molten metal, and that I was lying when I said some referred to molten steel. You were lying and being very stupid and illiterate again, nut job. > Why so afraid? Your ignorance, stupidity, illiteracy, and lies are amusing and they prove my point, nut job. That's not frightening - it's comforting and amusing. Can you find the words "molten steel" in that quote, nut job? You said they weren't used. They are. Can you see them, nut job? > You are the one who said it, not me. I said the eyewitnesses used the words "molten steel". They did. It's in the quotes. Did you find the words "molten steel" in the quotes yet, nut job? You lied again, nut job. >>>> "A witness said "In the first few weeks, sometimes when a >>>> worker would pull a steel beam from the wreckage, the end of >>>> the beam would be dripping molten steel"." -- http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.ae911truth.org
From: AllYou! on 19 Oct 2009 12:24 In news:hbi2pm$m3b$3(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: > AllYou! wrote: > >> So you disagree with your whacko friend here? > > You're not my friend, hut job, and of course I disagree > with your insane nut job conspiracy lies, nut job. So you disagree with your whacko friend here? >>> I said the eyewitnesses used the words "molten steel". > >> And I asked you to show > > No, Yes.
From: Al Dykes on 19 Oct 2009 12:32 In article <hbi2af$m3b$1(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu>, Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >AllYou! wrote: >> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: >>> AllYou! wrote: >>>> In news:hb9s4s$7r9$1(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, >>>> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: >>>>> AllYou! wrote: > >>>>>> Why so much anger? > >>>>> You're mistaking mild amusement for anger, nut job. > >>>> Lacing every single comment with very many insults and >>>> name-calling is a very angry trait, and anger is born of fear. > >>> No it isn't, any more than it is when I tell you that >>> you're barely literate and extremely simple minded. I'm >>> just being honest, nut job. ;-) > > >> Yes, it is. > > And of course, no one used the words "molten steel" >in the quotes below, right nut job? Thanks for being >you (a nut job) makes my day even more fun.... <g> > >"The structural engineer responsible for the design of the WTC, >described fires still burning and molten steel still running 21 >days after the attacks." > >"A witness said ?In the first few weeks, sometimes when a worker >would pull a steel beam from the wreckage, the end of the beam >would be dripping molten steel". And all of those quotes are second hand. There are no eyewitnesses to molten steel on the pile. -- Al Dykes News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising. - Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail
From: Iarnrod on 19 Oct 2009 13:04 On Oct 19, 9:58 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: > AllYou! wrote: > > Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> mused: > >> AllYou! wrote: > >>> Innews:hb9s4s$7r9$1(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, > >>> Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> mused: > >>>> AllYou! wrote: > >>>>> Why so much anger? > >>>> You're mistaking mild amusement for anger, nut job. > >>> Lacing every single comment with very many insults and > >>> name-calling is a very angry trait, and anger is born of fear. > >> No it isn't, any more than it is when I tell you that > >> you're barely literate and extremely simple minded. I'm > >> just being honest, nut job. ;-) > > Yes, it is. > > And of course, no one used the words "molten steel" > in the quotes below, right nut job? And of course, no one used the words "I saw..." in the quotes below, right, nut job? BWAHAHAHAAAHHAAAA!!!!! Hankie the Self Admitted Fired Janitor once more starts off our week with great laughs at his expense!
From: Michael Moroney on 19 Oct 2009 13:36
"AllYou!" <idaman(a)conversent.net> writes: >In news:hbhtnv$e1b$4(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, >Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: >> what else do you "think" it could have been, nut job? >Molten plastic, molten lead, molten aluminum, molten copper, >molten....... Don't forget there were 2 767s worth of aluminum in the pile, in addition to whatever was there before. |