911 and the Demo Truth
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Intermediate Accounting 12th and 13th edition Kieso Weygandt
Next: JSH: Back to conic section parameterization result
From: AllYou! on 18 Oct 2009 10:06 In news:hb9s4s$7r9$1(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: > AllYou! wrote: > >> Why so much anger? > > You're mistaking mild amusement for anger, nut job. Lacing eerfy single comment with very many insults and name-calling is a very angery trait, and anger is born of fear. Of what are you so afraid?
From: AllYou! on 18 Oct 2009 10:08 In news:hb9s90$7r9$2(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: > AllYou! wrote: >> They wouldn't even trust you with a broom, would they. > > There's actually a pretty easy method to determine if > someone is a deluded nutjob, or a rational, logical, and > intelligent person. Snipped the rest of the ways in which you've proven that you're a whakco.
From: AllYou! on 18 Oct 2009 10:08 In news:hb9siu$8i5$1(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: > AllYou! wrote: >> You agreed with your little buddy here, and so you did. > > No, I didn't. So you think he's crazy too?
From: AllYou! on 18 Oct 2009 10:12 In news:hb9t0r$9c5$1(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: > AllYou! wrote: >>>>>> Lava flows in foundries? > >>>>> No one has said that but you, nut job. Learn how to read and >>>>> think, nut job. > >>>> You did. You just said that it looked like flowing lava like >>>> a foundry. > >>> Wrong nut job, I quoted FDNY members who compared it to >>> lava and a foundry. > >> Ahhhhhhhhh. They compared what they saw at the WTC to the >> pictures they've seen of laval and steel at a foundry. So how >> do those comparisons prove that it was steel any more than it >> proves that it was lava? > > Close your mouth and stop drooling, nut job. It's unseemly. Failure to answer the question, thereby meeting your own standard of a whack job
From: AllYou! on 18 Oct 2009 10:15
In news:hb9t8g$9q2$1(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: > AllYou! wrote: >>> Actually, I'm relying on photo and eyewitness evidence, nut >>> job. > >> How do they know that it was metal at all > > Since it was dripping from super heated brightly glowing steel Nothing was found to be dripping from "super heated glowing steel". Nothing. |