911 and the Demo Truth
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Intermediate Accounting 12th and 13th edition Kieso Weygandt
Next: JSH: Back to conic section parameterization result
From: AllYou! on 19 Oct 2009 11:50 In news:hbhtav$d7k$1(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: > AllYou! wrote: >> In news:hb9s4s$7r9$1(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, >> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: >>> AllYou! wrote: > >>>> Why so much anger? > >>> You're mistaking mild amusement for anger, nut job. > >> Lacing every single comment with very many insults and >> name-calling is a very angry trait, and anger is born of fear. > > No it isn't, Yes, it is. Of what are you so afraid?
From: AllYou! on 19 Oct 2009 11:53 In news:hbhtmn$e1b$2(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: > AllYou! wrote: > I said the eyewitnesses used the words "molten steel". And I asked you to show us how those eye-witnesses could possibly know the difference between molten steel, molten metal of some other kind, or molten anything. And all that you're replied is that it must've been steel because it was on some steel. It there was as much molten stuff as you say, it must've been on some concrete too. Does that mean it was molten concrete? >>>> How does that worker know the difference between molten steel, >>>> and molten metal other than steel? > >>> One step at a time for you, nut job. > >> OK, your refusal to back up your claims is noted.
From: AllYou! on 19 Oct 2009 11:54 In news:hbhtna$e1b$3(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: > AllYou! wrote: >>>> Just like you know that beams weighing thousands of tons each >>>> landed 600 feet from the WTC? > >>> I never made that claim, nut job. You sure do lie a lot. > >> You agreed with your little buddy here, and so you did. > > No, I didn't. Are you now claiming that you disagree with him?
From: AllYou! on 19 Oct 2009 11:56 In news:hbhtnv$e1b$4(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: > AllYou! wrote: >>> Actually, I'm relying on photo and eyewitness evidence, nut >>> job. > >> How do they know that it was metal at all > > Since it was dripping from , There were no super heated brightly glowing steel beams at the site. If there were, you could prove that there were. But if it was also dripping from some of the concrete, would that mean that it was molten concrete? > what else do you "think" it could have been, nut job? Molten plastic, molten lead, molten aluminum, molten copper, molten.......
From: AllYou! on 19 Oct 2009 11:57
In news:hbhtog$e1b$5(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> mused: > AllYou! wrote: >>> "The structural engineer responsible for the design of the WTC, >>> described fires still burning and molten steel still running 21 >>> days after the attacks." > >> He was there? > > One step at a time for you, nut job. Step one: Was he there? >>> "A witness said ?In the first few weeks, sometimes when a >>> worker would pull a steel beam from the wreckage, the end of >>> the beam would be dripping molten steel". > >> How does that worker know the difference between molten steel, >> and molten metal other than steel? > > One step at a time for you, nut job. Step one: Was he there? >>> Can you find the words "molten steel" in that quote, nut job? >>> If not, is there anyone nearby who is sane and literate that >>> could help you find it, nut job? <chuckle> > >> Still exceeding your own definition of a whacko. > > Did you find the words "molten steel", ya silly, psychotic, > deluded, lying nut job? If not, is there anyone nearby who > is sane and literate that could help you find it, nut job? Still exceeding your own definition of a whacko |