A constant speed of light in all reference frames? Surely you can't be serious.
in [Relativity]
|
From: spudnik on 17 Mar 2010 16:41 actually, I doubt if Young used photo paper; his set-up, a pinhole "splitting" at two other pinholes, was probably only adequate for teh amazing sensitivity of the human eye; did he just draw hte moire'? > (in the air, if you will, viz permeability & permitivity); > among his proofs was the "two pin-hole experiment" -- > 2PHX? -- which gave a loveley moire' pattern > on the photographic (silver oxide?) emulsion. (his source thus: Rodriguez's observations are dquite valid, he being an on-duty custodian at one of the towers; however, his interp[retations are open to questioning! > Of course not, Hankie the Self-Admitted Fired Janitor. That's why we thus: I'm an idiot. what's funny is that I attended the Ninth Nonlinear Science Conference at UCLA, where the keynoter told the story of how, Newton stole the inverse second-power law (the algebraization of Kepler's orbital constraints). thus: that is, he corrected an error in the marginal statemnt, thus also ruling-out all powers of two, as exponential (from the lemma that you only need to work the prime powers). > why would Fermat explicitly state n=4, otherwise? > (he did not prove n=3, explicitly.) thus: ha, good question about every God-am frequency (1/period). Burt also had a really good question, about (say) How would Sun emit a photon -- what shape does it go?... he must be using the new "mental operating system!" thus: most of the interpretation of the EPR "paradox" results, a l'Alain Aspect et al, is due to the ideal of a photon, in assinging all of the God-am energy of the wave-front as a "mass" (electron-voltage, say) of a particle, whence the wave-energy was somehow "caught" by the photo- eletrical device. here are two ways to get over this: a) just consider the practice of audio quantization, the phonon; b) show how the photoelectrical device is actually tuned to absorb a particular frequency of light. so, is the "phonon" just one cycle of the period of the sound, and like-wise, is the photon just one cycle of the frequency? --Light: A History! http://wlym.com --Weber's electron, Moon's nucleus! http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/ --Stop Cheeny, Rice, Waxman, Pendergast and ICC's 3rd Brutish invasion of Sudan! http://larouchepub.com
From: David Thomson on 28 Mar 2010 13:01 On Mar 13, 3:33 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Time is a concept. Would you be interested in understanding what is > physically occurring in nature for the traveling twins clock to > physically tick slower? > > The traveling twins clock ticks slower because it is under a greater > amount of aether pressure than the clock which remains on the Earth. > This additional aether pressure the traveling clock is under causes > the traveling clock to physically tick slower. I agree with your view of Aether pressure. It is logical and quantifiable. To further expand on your idea, time is a function of matter. Without matter there is no time. If matter is sped up, Aether pressure increases (with a maximum pressure at the speed of light), and matter functions more slowly. It is the observation of the matter, which gives the appearance of slow moving time. And one must ask, "speeding matter is moving slower relative to what?" It is moving slower than matter under less Aether pressure. However, it is not the speed of the object that is moving slower. After all, it is moving closer to the speed of light, which is pretty fast. But rather, it is the cyclical processes of the subatomic particles that are moving slower. And since subatomic particles compose atoms, and atoms compose molecules, and molecules compose greater structures, matter traveling near the speed of light will experience a slower passage of time. However, the space surrounding the matter does not age any faster or slower. In fact, in order for a speed limit for photons and matter to exist, space must constantly oscillate at a fixed frequency. Also, space must be oscillating at a fixed frequency in order for subatomic particles to have a fixed frequency and exhibit the properties of half spin. The fact that subatomic particles have half spin requires than the oscillation of space (Aether) must exist in more dimensions than the physical world we experience. And since the missing dimension occurs with regard to particle spin, the missing dimension must be a frequency (reciprocal time) dimension, not a length or reciprocal length dimension. In the Aether Physics Model, I have provided an abundance of evidence and quantification that the Universe exists in a five-dimensional space-resonance, rather than a four-dimensional space-time. Space- time is what the Universe looks like from the perspective of matter. Space-resonance is what the Universe looks like from the perspective of Aether. Dave www.secrets-of-the-aether.com
From: David Thomson on 28 Mar 2010 13:12 On Mar 13, 7:25 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I am divorcing time as a dimension. Time is a concept. The rate at > which a clock ticks has nothing to do with time. > > If you own a battery operated clock and it begins to tick slower has > time changed? > > No, time has not changed. You replace the batteries. You 'know' time > has not changed because you understand what has occurred physically in > nature in order to cause the clock to tick slower. The same is true > for an atomic clock. The rate at which an atomic clock ticks is > dependent upon the aether pressure in which it exists. I agree with your view of time being dependent upon Aether pressure. And I also agree time is more of a concept than a physical reality. However, frequency is a real dimension and time is its reciprocal. The rate of an atomic clock is its frequency. The frequency of the atomic clock will vary as Aether pressure varies, and this should be provable in an Earth-based lab. All it would take would be a strong magnetic, electrostatic, or gravitational field properly applied, which would create the necessary Aether pressure. There is also a gradient of Aether pressure as one moves away from the Earth's center of gravity, which has been verified with atomic clocks when testing for the GR effect. Further, the matter of the Earth is entrained with the Aether surrounding it. This causes the Aether to drag along with the Earth, thus causing the Sagnac effect. Moving in the direction of the Earth rotation causes a lower Aether pressure than moving in the direction against the Earth's rotation. Dave www.secrets-of-the-aether.com
From: mpc755 on 28 Mar 2010 13:38 On Mar 28, 1:12 pm, David Thomson <aetherwiz...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 13, 7:25 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > I am divorcing time as a dimension. Time is a concept. The rate at > > which a clock ticks has nothing to do with time. > > > If you own a battery operated clock and it begins to tick slower has > > time changed? > > > No, time has not changed. You replace the batteries. You 'know' time > > has not changed because you understand what has occurred physically in > > nature in order to cause the clock to tick slower. The same is true > > for an atomic clock. The rate at which an atomic clock ticks is > > dependent upon the aether pressure in which it exists. > > I agree with your view of time being dependent upon Aether pressure. > And I also agree time is more of a concept than a physical reality. > However, frequency is a real dimension and time is its reciprocal. > > The rate of an atomic clock is its frequency. The frequency of the > atomic clock will vary as Aether pressure varies, and this should be > provable in an Earth-based lab. All it would take would be a strong > magnetic, electrostatic, or gravitational field properly applied, > which would create the necessary Aether pressure. > > There is also a gradient of Aether pressure as one moves away from the > Earth's center of gravity, which has been verified with atomic clocks > when testing for the GR effect. Further, the matter of the Earth is > entrained with the Aether surrounding it. This causes the Aether to > drag along with the Earth, thus causing the Sagnac effect. Moving in > the direction of the Earth rotation causes a lower Aether pressure > than moving in the direction against the Earth's rotation. > > Dave > www.secrets-of-the-aether.com Correct. I place quotes around terms like 'entrainment', 'flow', and 'drag' to note I am not 100% sure this is exactly what the state of the aether is in terms of the concepts the terms denote. The aether may be a one something. Thanks. Mike p.s. put "http://" in front of www.secrets-of-the-aether.com to get there directly from google groups.
From: mpc755 on 28 Mar 2010 13:47
On Mar 28, 1:01 pm, David Thomson <aetherwiz...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 13, 3:33 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Time is a concept. Would you be interested in understanding what is > > physically occurring in nature for the traveling twins clock to > > physically tick slower? > > > The traveling twins clock ticks slower because it is under a greater > > amount of aether pressure than the clock which remains on the Earth. > > This additional aether pressure the traveling clock is under causes > > the traveling clock to physically tick slower. > > I agree with your view of Aether pressure. It is logical and > quantifiable. > > To further expand on your idea, time is a function of matter. Without > matter there is no time. If matter is sped up, Aether pressure > increases (with a maximum pressure at the speed of light), and matter > functions more slowly. > > It is the observation of the matter, which gives the appearance of > slow moving time. And one must ask, "speeding matter is moving slower > relative to what?" It is moving slower than matter under less Aether > pressure. > > However, it is not the speed of the object that is moving slower. > After all, it is moving closer to the speed of light, which is pretty > fast. But rather, it is the cyclical processes of the subatomic > particles that are moving slower. And since subatomic particles > compose atoms, and atoms compose molecules, and molecules compose > greater structures, matter traveling near the speed of light will > experience a slower passage of time. > > However, the space surrounding the matter does not age any faster or > slower. In fact, in order for a speed limit for photons and matter to > exist, space must constantly oscillate at a fixed frequency. Also, > space must be oscillating at a fixed frequency in order for subatomic > particles to have a fixed frequency and exhibit the properties of half > spin. > > The fact that subatomic particles have half spin requires than the > oscillation of space (Aether) must exist in more dimensions than the > physical world we experience. And since the missing dimension occurs > with regard to particle spin, the missing dimension must be a > frequency (reciprocal time) dimension, not a length or reciprocal > length dimension. > > In the Aether Physics Model, I have provided an abundance of evidence > and quantification that the Universe exists in a five-dimensional > space-resonance, rather than a four-dimensional space-time. Space- > time is what the Universe looks like from the perspective of matter. > Space-resonance is what the Universe looks like from the perspective > of Aether. > > Dave > www.secrets-of-the-aether.com I see no reason for more than three dimensions in physics. I see physics as the 'physics of nature'. Discussions involving more than three dimensional space are fine, I just think they should be part of something other than the 'physics of nature'. Something as simple as E=mc^2 is explained in three dimensional space. 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. EINSTEIN' http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c2." The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether and matter is energy. |