A question about coil winding
in [Basics]
|
Prev: component tester, transistors and diodes / LEDs
Next: Discharging a lithium-ion battery, what is the third wire for?
From: Josepi on 13 Jan 2010 19:39 I guess that proves it then by your fine example. Thanx Time to get rid of that cheap POS "newsreader" that use try to browse Usenets posts with, apparently. Get one that can thread and read the associated headers with the text and try to keep any relevent text with your response. This will make it more apparent what you are referring to next time. nospam(a)nevis.com> wrote in message news:4b4e0f31$1(a)news.x-privat.org... What the hell are you on about now? Nobody has a clue what you are referring to. Josepi wrote: > No but the font you use does! > > > LOL > >
From: nospam on 13 Jan 2010 20:22 Josepi wrote: > I guess that proves it then by your fine example. Thanx > > Time to get rid of that cheap POS "newsreader" that use try to browse > Usenets posts with, apparently. > > Get one that can thread and read the associated headers with the text and > try to keep any relevent text with your response. This will make it more > apparent what you are referring to next time. > > I'm using a newsreader that does all that, you are the problem, not anyone's newsreader. By top posting and misappropriating quotes nobody has any idea who or what you are referring to.
From: Michael B on 13 Jan 2010 20:29 He promised that he wouldn't waste any more of his precious time on this, so I'm hoping that he's true to his word. On Jan 13, 12:07 pm, "Josepi" <J...(a)invaliid.con> wrote: > Well Michael? > Ignore the jerk. He won't convince anybody, especially thinking people, with > his contradictory tactics.
From: Michael B on 13 Jan 2010 20:42 No. The field strength is related to the number of coils. So if I start out and go around the coil form 2,000 times with one wire, could I get the same effect by using a multistrand, with each strand insulated from the adjacent one? If I were to use a 10 strand and only go around the coil form 200 times, would it have the same effect? Litz wire would not have much current capacity, but would it have the same instantaneous magnetic field from a capacitive discharge? It's not a question of multiple solder joints along the way, it would be a beginning, and an end, with wires soldered together at those points only. On Jan 13, 12:14 pm, "Josepi" <J...(a)invaliid.con> wrote: > Well done! > > Do you have a lot of this multi-strand wire to use for a cheap price? > > I think it would make the winding too complicated. Instead of many turns you > will have days of soldering connections to get all the strands in series. > That's a huge lump you may not have room for.
From: baron on 14 Jan 2010 06:59
John Fields Inscribed thus: > >>On Jan 12, 10:06 am, John Fields <jfie...(a)austininstruments.com> >>wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:35:34 -0800 (PST), Michael B > <baughfam(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > >>>it's not like we'd be any worse off without you. > >>You're right. You've done a good job of making things bad, >>I doubt anyone could make it much worse. > > --- > Made things bad??? > > All I've done is point out to you that, on USENET, bottom posting is > preferable to top posting and that your incessant use of the evil top > posting method is frowned upon by most of USENET and even advised > against by Google Groups, that bastion for the clueless and thorn in > the side of USENET. > > You, on the other hand, are part of the problem and have decided to > fight tooth and nail against changing your posting style to one that > is used by easily 90% of the rest of us because you think it's more > important to be inflammatory and keep playing your little troll games. > > A good example is the IKYABWAI nonsense with which you started this > post. > > I really have no need to waste any more of my precious time replying > to your inane prattle, so unless you can come up with something > intersting, goodbye. > > JF Just block "Google Groups" period. Problem gone... -- Best Regards: Baron. |