From: daestrom on
sparky wrote:
> It mostly depends on what you want to do. A few years ago there was
> no usenet and no regulars..

Actually, 'usenet' is a lot older than the WWW. Before http and www,
there was uucp (unix-to-unix copy). You could send e-mail and usenet
messages without an 'internet'.

daestrom
From: daestrom on
Josepi wrote:
> Usenet has come a long way since we used to ftp the messages down.

ftp??? Boy, that came along much later. Usenet is an offshoot of old
'bulletin board' systems. Starting out on UN*X machines at
universities, it used UUCP to transfer batches of messages from machine
to machine. That was pre IP-protocol days.

Browsers
> were developed and threading became a reality and attaching messages to your
> reply became unecessary, except for clarity of response.

Change that to 'news readers' and you'd be right. 'Browsers' were
developed for the WWW sometime later.

The simple proof of that is if you're reading in google groups or such,
you're actually reading a page of html text. The server at google has
taken the news-server messages and stripped and reformatted them into
html for serving out to a web browser.

When you reply to a message using google groups, google's server takes
the response from your 'post' message to the web server and puts its own
news header on it and sends it to various news servers around the world.

>
> Top posting has always been encouraged by all browsers in order to keep
> headers with the their respective text and the latest posted information at
> the position the post was opened, by your modern browser.

Now you're just making stuff up. The 'headers' are not normally put in
the text window but in a separate section not normally viewed by humans.
For example in my news reader, I don't see any 'headers' in the text
window. To view the headers I simply use a menu option.

Each news server that sends a message adds its own address onto the
header but that has nothing to do with 'top posting'.

daestrom
From: daestrom on
Fred Abse wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 12:52:55 -0600, amdx wrote:
>
>> Your NOT sticking with the crowd. Take some time and read some groups,
>> you will find the convention is bottom posting.
>> Regulars don't use browsers for a newsgroup, they use a newsreader.
>
> He's using Outhouse Excuse. That ain't no browser.
>

It's not even a very good news-reader ;-)

AFAIK, you can't use OE as a 'browser' to surf the WWW :-/

daestrom


From: Josepi on
Was that when you were a ship's captain in the Navy, a nuclear Physicist or
a Hydro Operator?

"daestrom" <daestrom(a)twcny.rr.com> wrote in message
news:hi5ko60u7r(a)news1.newsguy.com...

<the usual snipped>

daestrom


From: Josepi on
Dimentia becoming aproblem?

"daestrom" <daestrom(a)twcny.rr.com> wrote in message
news:hi5krt1u7r(a)news1.newsguy.com...
Fred Abse wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 12:52:55 -0600, amdx wrote:
>
>> Your NOT sticking with the crowd. Take some time and read some groups,
>> you will find the convention is bottom posting.
>> Regulars don't use browsers for a newsgroup, they use a newsreader.
>
> He's using Outhouse Excuse. That ain't no browser.
>

It's not even a very good news-reader ;-)

AFAIK, you can't use OE as a 'browser' to surf the WWW :-/

daestrom