A question about coil winding
in [Basics]
|
Prev: component tester, transistors and diodes / LEDs
Next: Discharging a lithium-ion battery, what is the third wire for?
From: YD on 12 Jan 2010 21:12 Late at night, by candle light, You <you(a)shadow.orgs> penned this immortal opus: >In article <foenk5hmq4htmj4oqpq81q272ue48jqlku(a)4ax.com>, > krw <krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote: > >> On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 12:27:57 -0900, You <you(a)shadow.orgs> wrote: >> >> >In article <tp5lk51t3qt65aioqudtqtbsb5mnliv7to(a)4ax.com>, >> > YD <ydtechHAT(a)techie.com> wrote: >> > >> >> How do you tally the membership? AFAIK newsservers don't keep a count >> >> on subscribed groups on a user basis. >> >> >> >> - YD. >> >> -- >> >> Remove HAT if replying by mail. >> > >> >No but Goggle does..... >> >> Google can only tally what Google can see, which ain't the Usenet. > >If you only had a CLUE about that you would be surprised. Google INDEXES >and ARCHIVES ALL Usenet posts, plus a LOT More, in and around the WWW. >Just where do you think the SPAMMERS DataMine all their eMail and >Address's from??? They've done that long before google came around. You really have no clue to how nntp actually works. - YD. -- Remove HAT if replying by mail.
From: John Fields on 13 Jan 2010 10:27 >On Jan 12, 10:06�am, John Fields <jfie...(a)austininstruments.com> >wrote: On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:35:34 -0800 (PST), Michael B <baughfam(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: >>it's not like we'd be any worse off without you. >You're right. You've done a good job of making things bad, >I doubt anyone could make it much worse. --- Made things bad??? All I've done is point out to you that, on USENET, bottom posting is preferable to top posting and that your incessant use of the evil top posting method is frowned upon by most of USENET and even advised against by Google Groups, that bastion for the clueless and thorn in the side of USENET. You, on the other hand, are part of the problem and have decided to fight tooth and nail against changing your posting style to one that is used by easily 90% of the rest of us because you think it's more important to be inflammatory and keep playing your little troll games. A good example is the IKYABWAI nonsense with which you started this post. I really have no need to waste any more of my precious time replying to your inane prattle, so unless you can come up with something intersting, goodbye. JF
From: Josepi on 13 Jan 2010 11:54 See what you started? LOL Next thing ya' know the Usenet collapse will all be your fault. ROFLMAO This is what makes Usenet a thing of the past.. the trolls = people bored. "Michael B" <baughfam(a)bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:5289aaa2-f366-408a-a082-c3e8a7a5f58e(a)m16g2000yqc.googlegroups.com... I'm not convinced it's a trolling. I looked at the listing from a year ago at this time. There were several active topics, and three spams. Now, there are only about three active threads, and they have deviated considerably off topic, and there are at least 19 spams ranging from sneakers to nudes. So indeed, there is still a batch of daily messages, if you call them that, but the signal-to-noise ratio has gotten really bad since this time last year. And that doesn't speak well for the future. On Jan 10, 12:46 am, Sjouke Burry <burrynulnulf...(a)ppllaanneett.nnll> wrote: > You start blathering on a group where there direct disproof of your > opinion. > Daily a batch of messages, and only when people like you come around, > trolling , things get ugly. > So improve the group and vanish.....
From: Josepi on 13 Jan 2010 12:07 Well Michael? Now do you believe me that these bottom posting OCD idiots are only here for the troll subject? Look at the contradictions in this idiot's post! Take the hook out of your mouth and stop feeding this troll, POS. Read the third paragragh he blathered and think how it applies to his troll. He has confused the whole thread with his posting style and exemplifies the whole top-posting point quite well. He probably has never posted on topic yet. Ignore the jerk. He won't convince anybody, especially thinking people, with his contradictory tactics. It's just an off-topic troll. This is why Usenet is failng mostly. The ISPs are tired of the legal implications resulting from these immature people. flame harder, boys...LOL "John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in message news:dlnrk5hmkuaapt9o1n143h075599fv0vu2(a)4ax.com... Made things bad??? All I've done is point out to you that, on USENET, bottom posting is preferable to top posting and that your incessant use of the evil top posting method is frowned upon by most of USENET and even advised against by Google Groups, that bastion for the clueless and thorn in the side of USENET. ****"You, on the other hand, are part of the problem and have decided to fight tooth and nail against changing your posting style to one that is used by easily 90% of the rest of us because you think it's more important to be inflammatory and keep playing your little troll games."*** A good example is the IKYABWAI nonsense with which you started this post. I really have no need to waste any more of my precious time replying to your inane prattle, so unless you can come up with something intersting, goodbye. JF JF >On Jan 12, 10:06 am, John Fields <jfie...(a)austininstruments.com> >wrote: On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:35:34 -0800 (PST), Michael B <baughfam(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: >>it's not like we'd be any worse off without you. >You're right. You've done a good job of making things bad, >I doubt anyone could make it much worse.
From: Josepi on 13 Jan 2010 12:14
Well done! Do you have a lot of this multi-strand wire to use for a cheap price? I think it would make the winding too complicated. Instead of many turns you will have days of soldering connections to get all the strands in series. That's a huge lump you may not have room for. "Michael B" <baughfam(a)bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:c0d90d03-c7d9-4c60-b2d0-844bea62656b(a)m26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... Preparing to wind a motor coil or more. Need some info to consider a shortcut. Putting aside the issue of current handling capacity, does anyone have awareness of whether a multistrand wire made of smaller magnet wires can serve instead of a single wire with the same number of windings? On Jan 8, 9:00 am, John Fields <jfie...(a)austininstruments.com> wrote: > --- < trolling snipped> > > --- < trolling snipped> > --- < trolling snipped> > --- < insulting snipped> --- <temper tantrum snipped> > JF |