Compatability of open office with MS word processor..
in [Freeware]
|
Prev: Ari, the only thing you have /proved/ is you're a lamer!
Next: Linux Ware Weekly #4 (Email Clients)
From: Fred on 15 Mar 2010 15:29 "Mike Dee" <emteedee(a)emteedee.invalid> wrote in message news:emteedee-FE77DA.21244715032010(a)mail.eternal-september.org... > In article <hnkb2h$3s4$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, > "Fred" <reg(a)parachute.net.nz> wrote: > >> "�Q�" <boxcars(a)gmx.net> wrote in message >> news:20100314223244.0558ee20(a)bellgrove.remarqs.net... >> > In <news:hnk81m$ii5$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, >> > Fred <reg(a)parachute.net.nz> wrote: >> > >> >> The ord processor document shows extension .wps. Going to open office >> >> file/open I cannot see which file type to use. There is no .wps. >> > >> > That's a Works Word Processor file, but everyone (including me) assumed >> > you meant Word, heh. > [...] > >> > Another (better, IMO) option is to switch from the OpenOffice app from >> > openoffice.org to the enhanced Go-OO version from >> > <http://www.go-oo.org/>. >> >> My post clearly said microsoft word processor, but still haven't found >> the >> answer. > > The term you used; "MS word processor", is generic. If you read my post I said Microfoft word processor.
From: nomail on 15 Mar 2010 19:10 On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 08:29:04 +1300, "Fred" <reg(a)parachute.net.nz> wrote: >> >> The term you used; "MS word processor", is generic. > >If you read my post I said Microfoft word processor. > LOL Pete
From: Mike Dee on 15 Mar 2010 20:03 "Fred" <reg(a)parachute.net.nz> wrote: > "Mike Dee" <emteedee(a)emteedee.invalid> wrote: > > "Fred" <reg(a)parachute.net.nz> wrote: > >> My post clearly said microsoft word processor, but still haven't found > >> the > >> answer. > > > > The term you used; "MS word processor", is generic. > > If you read my post I said Microfoft word processor. I did: Why don't you try reading it? Its in your own *Subject* heading: Re: Compatability of open office with MS word processor.. While you're at it, try re-reading some of the posts where you actually got the advice you obviously needed - mine included. -- dee
From: Fred on 15 Mar 2010 20:30 "Paul Blarmy" <foxesfan(a)trashmail.net> wrote in message news:MPG.2608cf44497f39e7989a22(a)news.virginmedia.com... > On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 08:29:04 +1300, Fred wrote... > >> If you read my post I said Microfoft word processor. > > I promise you, you didn't. > I promise you if you read my original post it says Microsoft word processor. Promise.
From: Fred on 15 Mar 2010 20:33
"Mike Dee" <emteedee(a)emteedee.invalid> wrote in message news:emteedee-7EFA14.11033516032010(a)mail.eternal-september.org... > "Fred" <reg(a)parachute.net.nz> wrote: > >> "Mike Dee" <emteedee(a)emteedee.invalid> wrote: >> > "Fred" <reg(a)parachute.net.nz> wrote: > >> >> My post clearly said microsoft word processor, but still haven't >> >> found >> >> the >> >> answer. >> > >> > The term you used; "MS word processor", is generic. >> >> If you read my post I said Microfoft word processor. > > I did: Why don't you try reading it? Its in your own *Subject* heading: > Re: Compatability of open office with MS word processor.. > > While you're at it, try re-reading some of the posts where you actually > got the advice you obviously needed - mine included. Yes, but standard newsgroup practise is to pose the question in the message body - not the subject line. That is what I did. That aside - thanks for your advice. |