Cranks on the endangered species list
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: The spinor nature of spacetime - Fictitious motion in a Minkowski spacetime
Next: QCD Meson Mass Paper -- Full Draft
From: Strich.9 on 23 Dec 2008 15:00 On Dec 23, 2:54 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > No sir. They do not owe it to anyone. They are running a *business*. You hit the nail in the head. Modern science is now a business. Anti- relativity information is bad for business.
From: Dirk Van de moortel on 23 Dec 2008 15:41 bjones <nipit(a)4sure.com> wrote in message o7g2l4ti4ci8h01bdnp7l2ltbnd01mg8hm(a)4ax.com > It doesn't take a superlative sleuth to see that > Dear Dr. Dirk also has no rebuttal. You have proven not to recognize a rebuttal while it is biting your head off and sucking out your skull. You are autistic, Brian, A U T I S T I C. But by no means let that stop or even hinder you ;-) Dirk Vdm > > Funny how he can label something "utter nonsense" > even though he is utterly unable to refute it. > (But that's assuming that he understood it!) > > All he has to do is to tell us why the sliding rod > will not absolutely synchronize the clocks. > > /bjones/
From: PD on 23 Dec 2008 15:45 On Dec 23, 2:00 pm, "Strich.9" <strich.9...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 23, 2:54 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > No sir. They do not owe it to anyone. They are running a *business*. > > You hit the nail in the head. Modern science is now a business. Publishing is a business. Always has been. Is this a surprise to you? > Anti- > relativity information is bad for business. Why? Nobel prizes are specifically given to those who buck the status quo, and that generates a whole slew of funding for the new area of research. Why do you think that this is bad for business? Gee, I hope you're not trying to take care of yourself. It seems you don't have enough fiscal sense to carry an ATM card, let alone be sent to the grocery store alone. Is someone preparing your meals for you? PD
From: PD on 23 Dec 2008 15:48 On Dec 23, 1:51 pm, bjones <ni...(a)4sure.com> wrote: > It doesn't take a superlative sleuth to see that > Dear Dr. Dirk also has no rebuttal. Brian, you seem off the track here. When you post ideas here, you feel you are owed a compelling rebuttal. When you submit articles for publication and they are rejected, you feel you are owed a compelling rebuttal. When you don't get one, you issue a 3rd grade dare. I don't know why you think you are owed a rebuttal. If there is something about relativity that doesn't make sense to you, has it ever occurred to you just to ASK about it, rather than propose an alternative and demand that someone prove you wrong? > > Funny how he can label something "utter nonsense" > even though he is utterly unable to refute it. > (But that's assuming that he understood it!) > > All he has to do is to tell us why the sliding rod > will not absolutely synchronize the clocks. > > /bjones/
From: Dirk Van de moortel on 23 Dec 2008 15:55
PD <TheDraperFamily(a)gmail.com> wrote in message 6c931218-b929-493c-9180-a4cf4f7adb3c(a)q37g2000vbn.googlegroups.com > On Dec 23, 1:51 pm, bjones <ni...(a)4sure.com> wrote: >> It doesn't take a superlative sleuth to see that >> Dear Dr. Dirk also has no rebuttal. > > Brian, you seem off the track here. When you post ideas here, you feel > you are owed a compelling rebuttal. When you submit articles for > publication and they are rejected, you feel you are owed a compelling > rebuttal. When you don't get one, you issue a 3rd grade dare. > > I don't know why you think you are owed a rebuttal. Because in the past decade (and beyond) we have been actually giving him rebuttals galore. He got addicted to it. Now we got tired of rebutting. So he feels miserable. Neat, no? Dirk Vdm > > If there is something about relativity that doesn't make sense to you, > has it ever occurred to you just to ASK about it, rather than propose > an alternative and demand that someone prove you wrong? > >> >> Funny how he can label something "utter nonsense" >> even though he is utterly unable to refute it. >> (But that's assuming that he understood it!) >> >> All he has to do is to tell us why the sliding rod >> will not absolutely synchronize the clocks. >> >> /bjones/ |