Cranks on the endangered species list
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: The spinor nature of spacetime - Fictitious motion in a Minkowski spacetime
Next: QCD Meson Mass Paper -- Full Draft
From: PD on 23 Dec 2008 09:40 On Dec 23, 8:21 am, "Strich.9" <strich.9...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 23, 8:17 am, PD <TheDraperFam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Oh my. Officially in the Deep End.- > > Judging from the profusion of movie title variants in your posts, you > are obviously loitering too much on the discount section of your local > blockbuster for the holiday season. Gosh, I didn't even know there was a movie called the Deep End, but I looked it up, and there was, in 2001, released in Belgium. Thanks for broadening my horizons with your deep movie knowledge! > Nobody to buy gifts for? Or > nobody would invite you over? Not even your mother? No wonder you > are yearning for comedy
From: RustyJames on 23 Dec 2008 09:52 On Dec 23, 7:40 am, PD <TheDraperFam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 23, 8:21 am, "Strich.9" <strich.9...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Dec 23, 8:17 am, PD <TheDraperFam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Oh my. Officially in the Deep End.- > > > Judging from the profusion of movie title variants in your posts, you > > are obviously loitering too much on the discount section of your local > > blockbuster for the holiday season. > > Gosh, I didn't even know there was a movie called the Deep End, but I > looked it up, and there was, in 2001, released in Belgium. Thanks for > broadening my horizons with your deep movie knowledge! > > > > > Nobody to buy gifts for? Or > > nobody would invite you over? Not even your mother? No wonder you > > are yearning for comedy- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - all of you can suck my yull time log mery chrismas
From: schoenfeld.one on 23 Dec 2008 10:59 On Dec 23, 11:17 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 22, 7:38 pm, schoenfeld....(a)gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > > On Dec 23, 2:39 am, Tom Roberts <tjroberts...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > > > schoenfeld....(a)gmail.com wrote: > > > > facts if you are interested: > > > > Your so-called "facts" have never been demonstrated, much less > > > established as fact. > > > > > [1] gravitational effects are superluminal. > > > > What God told you this? > > > This was measured in dreamland. They measured gravitational wave > > interference near the reactor and for all intensive purposes was > > superluminal. The reactor works by transmuting the stable element 115 > > into highly unstable element 116 which immediately decays into > > antimatter. Due to the nature of element 155 falling within the island > > of stability, the cumulative strong nuclear forces extend far beyond > > the perimiter of the atom. This strong-nuclear-force wave is amplified > > (gravity horn) during the reaction and channeled via wave-guides. > > These emissions of the amplified strong nuclear forces interact with > > the gravitational field, and for all intensive purposes are > > gravitational fields themselves. Deformations of space and time also > > arise in regions of gravitational interference. > > > [...] > > Oh my. Officially in the Deep End.- Hide quoted text - "Dreamland" is the nickname for the S4 installation at Groom Lake, Nevada. Everything I've told you is 100% true. You, and the rest of the petty, are just too stupid to figure it out.
From: Androcles on 23 Dec 2008 11:08 "bjones" <nipit(a)4sure.com> wrote in message news:dgr1l4d61p89pp30ilu57r12l1ekfin0nf(a)4ax.com... > To both PD & Dr. Henri: > > On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:37:12 -0800 (PST), PD > <TheDraperFamily(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> 1. (Good) A clock that intrinsically runs faster than all others (or a >>> person who ages faster than all others). >> >>Can't use this. Seto has already claimed it. > > But Dr. Seto has no exclusive rights to the truth. > >>Let me know when you find one. > > Rusty did not really say that I had to find one, but it can > easily be done via a one-way light speed measurement. > >>> 1. (Better) Something that moves neither toward or away from an >>> approaching light ray. >> >>Hmmm... As I sit here, I do not detect my motion toward or away from >>the light ray from the door. I'm not sure how I would determine >>whether I am moving toward or away from that light ray. Do you know? >> > > Again, Mr. Rusty did not really request this much, but this much > can also easily be done. You can detect your motion wrt a light > ray by letting it travel between two synchronous clocks. > >>> >>> 2. (Best) Any inertial frame in which light's one-way speed is c >>> (in all directions) per a pair of (absolutely) synchronous clocks. >> >>Let me know when you figure out how to absolutely synchronize clocks. >> >>PD > > Been there, done that, but getting it published is even harder. :-( > (Know any legit journal that will accept anything anti-SR?) > (They are all set on "auto-reject.") (NOT LOL) > > On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:22:59 GMT, hw@..(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote: > --snip-- >>...but you are right. The expression is used wrongly and widely >>by relativists because, deep down, they all still believe an aether >>must exist to explain Einstein's P2. >> > > Hello, Dr. Henri: > "Deep down," an "aether" does indeed exist, as it has since > the beginning (or at least since .0003 billion years after the > Big Bang). If you mean 300,000 years then say so. This "aether" is simply light. Any light ray is an > absolute frame due to two simple facts, viz., (i) the fact that light > is source independent, and (ii) the fact that we know its actual > speed through space (via Maxwell). > > Given an absolute frame, the only thing we have to do to detect > our own motion through space is to measure our speed relative > to this given absolute frame. Of course, we have tried this using a > round-trip experiment, but that failed due to instrument distortions. > This left ONLY the one-way case. Fortunately, Nature cannot > possibly thwart us in this case because Nature does not *do* > clock synchronization. Only *man* can synchronize clocks, and > he can synchronize them in any way he pleases. As for me and > my house, we choose to *absolutely* synchronize them so we > can correctly measure our speed wrt light, thereby determining > our speed through space (absolute speed). > > /bjones/ >
From: bjones on 23 Dec 2008 11:42
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 06:38:02 -0800 (PST), PD <TheDraperFamily(a)gmail.com> wrote: -snip- >Your sighing capitulation that no reputable journal will >publish your work is a defense mechanism, designed to >shift blame to someone else (the "system") for the lack >of acceptance of your ideas. Let's compare your hyper-imagination with reality: The IJTP assistant editor wrote the following: "Regretfully I have to inform you that your paper MS030417.9 has been declined for its topic." Alwyn van der Merwe - Editor - Foundations of Physics wrote the following: "Dear Dr. Jones: There are a number of apparent conflicts in STR, but they have all been resolved by careful analysis. Thus it is difficult, if not impossible, to find referees who are prepared to spend any time on finding the flaw in the paradox of the day. I regret not being able to be more helpful. Cordially, AV" And, as Seto and Plutonium discovered, self-pub is not the way to go. It does not count in physics. And I would not even trust it or the internet (blog or otherwise) to really count regarding original authorship. /bjones/ |