Cranks on the endangered species list
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: The spinor nature of spacetime - Fictitious motion in a Minkowski spacetime
Next: QCD Meson Mass Paper -- Full Draft
From: Dirk Van de moortel on 23 Dec 2008 11:59 bjones <nipit(a)4sure.com> wrote in message p552l41hatnjpkppuq764cgdc7v64vi3tc(a)4ax.com > On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 06:38:02 -0800 (PST), > PD <TheDraperFamily(a)gmail.com> wrote: > -snip- >> Your sighing capitulation that no reputable journal will >> publish your work is a defense mechanism, designed to >> shift blame to someone else (the "system") for the lack >> of acceptance of your ideas. > > Let's compare your hyper-imagination with reality: > > The IJTP assistant editor wrote the following: > "Regretfully I have to inform you that your paper > MS030417.9 has been declined for its topic." hehe... "regretfully" ... :-) > > Alwyn van der Merwe - Editor - Foundations of Physics > wrote the following: > > "Dear Dr. Jones: Ha, a Dr.CAD designer. Nice. > > There are a number of apparent conflicts in STR, but > they have all been resolved by careful analysis. > Thus it is difficult, if not impossible, to find referees > who are prepared to spend any time on finding the flaw > in the paradox of the day. > > I regret not being able to be more helpful. hehe ... "I regret" ... :-) > > Cordially, > AV" Two polites ways to tell you what we have been telling you for years: GET LOST, IMBECILE. > > And, as Seto and Plutonium discovered, self-pub is not > the way to go. It does not count in physics. And I would > not even trust it or the internet (blog or otherwise) to > really count regarding original authorship. Yes, the *real* way to go is to harvest abuse on Usenet. And unlike these polite editors and reviewers, we do NOT pretend to regret providing it. Brutal honesty from our part in turn for brutal dishonesty from yours. Isn't that just great, Brian D. Jones, "CAD designer with expertise in Special Relativity" and former reviewer of http://www.journaloftheoretics.com/info.htm aka kk, aka Kurt Kingston, aka Dark Energy, aka Forumodus of Halicarnassus, aka TymBuk2, aka Cadwgan Gedrych, aka 2ndPostulateDude, aka SRdude, aka Edward Travis, aka Ron Aikas, aka Roy Royce, aka John Reid, aka Martin Miller aka Wings of Truth aka delta-T ? Dirk Vdm
From: PD on 23 Dec 2008 12:05 On Dec 23, 10:42 am, bjones <ni...(a)4sure.com> wrote: > On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 06:38:02 -0800 (PST),PD <TheDraperFam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > -snip- > > >Your sighing capitulation that no reputable journal will > >publish your work is a defense mechanism, designed to > >shift blame to someone else (the "system") for the lack > >of acceptance of your ideas. > > Let's compare your hyper-imagination with reality: > > The IJTP assistant editor wrote the following: > "Regretfully I have to inform you that your paper > MS030417.9 has been declined for its topic." > > Alwyn van der Merwe - Editor - Foundations of Physics > wrote the following: > > "Dear Dr. Jones: > > There are a number of apparent conflicts in STR, but > they have all been resolved by careful analysis. > Thus it is difficult, if not impossible, to find referees > who are prepared to spend any time on finding the flaw > in the paradox of the day. > > I regret not being able to be more helpful. > > Cordially, > AV" These reactions do not surprise me. > > And, as Seto and Plutonium discovered, self-pub is not > the way to go. It does not count in physics. And I would > not even trust it or the internet (blog or otherwise) to > really count regarding original authorship. Well, as I said, Brian, you have a nice story wrapped up for yourself. You want to publish an article about a thought experiment, and you want to do it in a mainstream journal. When the editorial staff at those selected mainstream journals refuse to comply, you have a handy excuse to see this as not being your fault. Furthermore, you say that you have no other viable options that "count". And so you have been victimized by The Man. But let's focus on what it is you are actually trying to publish for a moment. What you have been challenged to publish is a description of a working demonstration of absolutely synchronized clocks. This specific call is what you claimed has been attempted by you and rejected by editors at reputable journals. But the comments above do not refer to a paper of that sort, and are instead about a paper on a so-called SR paradox --- which has nothing to do with a description of a working demonstration of absolutely synchronized clocks. This naturally leads readers here to suspect you of being less than honest. Tell you what. Why don't you put whatever paper you are *actually* trying to publish up on a blog, and post a link to it here? Then we might be able to offer whatever suggestions we can to help you get it published in a reputable journal. There is then absolutely no risk to you, and provides an intermediate step to achieving what you say you want -- publication in a mainstream journal. PD
From: RustyJames on 23 Dec 2008 12:28 On Dec 23, 10:05 am, PD <TheDraperFam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 23, 10:42 am, bjones <ni...(a)4sure.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 06:38:02 -0800 (PST),PD <TheDraperFam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > -snip- > > > >Your sighing capitulation that no reputable journal will > > >publish your work is a defense mechanism, designed to > > >shift blame to someone else (the "system") for the lack > > >of acceptance of your ideas. > > > Let's compare your hyper-imagination with reality: > > > The IJTP assistant editor wrote the following: > > "Regretfully I have to inform you that your paper > > MS030417.9 has been declined for its topic." > > > Alwyn van der Merwe - Editor - Foundations of Physics > > wrote the following: > > > "Dear Dr. Jones: > > > There are a number of apparent conflicts in STR, but > > they have all been resolved by careful analysis. > > Thus it is difficult, if not impossible, to find referees > > who are prepared to spend any time on finding the flaw > > in the paradox of the day. > > > I regret not being able to be more helpful. > > > Cordially, > > AV" > > These reactions do not surprise me. > > > > > And, as Seto and Plutonium discovered, self-pub is not > > the way to go. It does not count in physics. And I would > > not even trust it or the internet (blog or otherwise) to > > really count regarding original authorship. > > Well, as I said, Brian, you have a nice story wrapped up for yourself. > You want to publish an article about a thought experiment, and you > want to do it in a mainstream journal. When the editorial staff at > those selected mainstream journals refuse to comply, you have a handy > excuse to see this as not being your fault. Furthermore, you say that > you have no other viable options that "count". And so you have been > victimized by The Man. > > But let's focus on what it is you are actually trying to publish for a > moment. What you have been challenged to publish is a description of a > working demonstration of absolutely synchronized clocks. This specific > call is what you claimed has been attempted by you and rejected by > editors at reputable journals. But the comments above do not refer to > a paper of that sort, and are instead about a paper on a so-called SR > paradox --- which has nothing to do with a description of a working > demonstration of absolutely synchronized clocks. This naturally leads > readers here to suspect you of being less than honest. > > Tell you what. Why don't you put whatever paper you are *actually* > trying to publish up on a blog, and post a link to it here? Then we > might be able to offer whatever suggestions we can to help you get it > published in a reputable journal. There is then absolutely no risk to > you, and provides an intermediate step to achieving what you say you > want -- publication in a mainstream journal. > > PD- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - This "aether" is simply light Wrong its dark energy and gravity combined in witch the velocity of the dark energy expansion will increase till the dark energy will convert back to the original mass through kinetic energy to mass conversion due the gravities lack of binding fore on dark energy
From: PD on 23 Dec 2008 13:35 On Dec 23, 9:59 am, schoenfeld....(a)gmail.com wrote: > On Dec 23, 11:17 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Dec 22, 7:38 pm, schoenfeld....(a)gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Dec 23, 2:39 am, Tom Roberts <tjroberts...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > > > > schoenfeld....(a)gmail.com wrote: > > > > > facts if you are interested: > > > > > Your so-called "facts" have never been demonstrated, much less > > > > established as fact. > > > > > > [1] gravitational effects are superluminal. > > > > > What God told you this? > > > > This was measured in dreamland. They measured gravitational wave > > > interference near the reactor and for all intensive purposes was > > > superluminal. The reactor works by transmuting the stable element 115 > > > into highly unstable element 116 which immediately decays into > > > antimatter. Due to the nature of element 155 falling within the island > > > of stability, the cumulative strong nuclear forces extend far beyond > > > the perimiter of the atom. This strong-nuclear-force wave is amplified > > > (gravity horn) during the reaction and channeled via wave-guides. > > > These emissions of the amplified strong nuclear forces interact with > > > the gravitational field, and for all intensive purposes are > > > gravitational fields themselves. Deformations of space and time also > > > arise in regions of gravitational interference. > > > > [...] > > > Oh my. Officially in the Deep End.- Hide quoted text - > > "Dreamland" is the nickname for the S4 installation at Groom Lake, > Nevada. Otherwise know as "Area 51" for the aficionados, who may be interested in doing a little Christmas shopping: http://www.dreamlandresort.com/ If Area 51 still doesn't ring a bell, then those who like desert vacations are encouraged to visit the small towns of Roswell NM or Rachel NV. However, for your safety, please PLEASE wear personal dosimeters. > > Everything I've told you is 100% true. > > You, and the rest of the petty, are just too stupid to figure it out.
From: Strich.9 on 23 Dec 2008 13:58
On Dec 23, 11:59 am, "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoor...(a)nospAm.hotmail.com> wrote: > > hehe... "regretfully" ... :-) > Kind of like the ex-communication letters from the papacy... Like the one Galileo got... |