From: Dr. Henri Wilson on
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 13:41:49 -0800 (PST), RustyJames
<extremesoundandlight(a)yahoo.com> wrote:


>The word at rest should be stricken from this forum can someone give
>me an instance where something is at truly at rest.

Everything is 'at rest' in its own frame. Objects can be MAR.

....but you are right. The expression is used wrongly and widely by relativists
because, deep down, they all still believe an aether must exist to explain
Einstein's P2.




Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)

www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm.

......
From: schoenfeld.one on
On Dec 23, 2:39 am, Tom Roberts <tjroberts...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> schoenfeld....(a)gmail.com wrote:
> > facts if you are interested:
>
> Your so-called "facts" have never been demonstrated, much less
> established as fact.
>
> > [1] gravitational effects are superluminal.
>
> What God told you this?

This was measured in dreamland. They measured gravitational wave
interference near the reactor and for all intensive purposes was
superluminal. The reactor works by transmuting the stable element 115
into highly unstable element 116 which immediately decays into
antimatter. Due to the nature of element 155 falling within the island
of stability, the cumulative strong nuclear forces extend far beyond
the perimiter of the atom. This strong-nuclear-force wave is amplified
(gravity horn) during the reaction and channeled via wave-guides.
These emissions of the amplified strong nuclear forces interact with
the gravitational field, and for all intensive purposes are
gravitational fields themselves. Deformations of space and time also
arise in regions of gravitational interference.

[...]
From: Dr. Henri Wilson on
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:41:52 -0800 (PST), PD <TheDraperFamily(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>On Dec 22, 3:21�pm, "Strich.9" <strich.9...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Dec 22, 3:46�pm, PD <TheDraperFam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>

>
>Oh, so you lied when you said "If you promise to take your
>medications, I'll help you out."
>
>Let's recap, shall we?
>You say there is something incoherent about relativity, but you can
>say what's incoherent about it.
>Is that because your thoughts about what is incoherent about
>relativity are too incoherent to put into words?
>
>The last baseball game I went to, there was a guy two rows back who
>had never been to a baseball game before and in fact didn't know much
>about the game, what the rules of play were, etc. But he sure liked to
>yell, "Kill the ref !" Even on perfectly fine plays, he'd just yell
>"Kill the ref !" because that's what he came to the game to do.
>Reminds me of you.

No it sounds just like YOU Diaper......BaTh is wrong, BaTh is wrong, BaTh is
wrong, BaTh is wrong...Einstein is right, Einstein is right....

By the way, do you have a terrible feeling of guilt every time you receive your
packet?

>PD



Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)

www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm.

......
From: PD on
On Dec 22, 7:38 pm, schoenfeld....(a)gmail.com wrote:
> On Dec 23, 2:39 am, Tom Roberts <tjroberts...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> > schoenfeld....(a)gmail.com wrote:
> > > facts if you are interested:
>
> > Your so-called "facts" have never been demonstrated, much less
> > established as fact.
>
> > > [1] gravitational effects are superluminal.
>
> > What God told you this?
>
> This was measured in dreamland. They measured gravitational wave
> interference near the reactor and for all intensive purposes was
> superluminal. The reactor works by transmuting the stable element 115
> into highly unstable element 116 which immediately decays into
> antimatter. Due to the nature of element 155 falling within the island
> of stability, the cumulative strong nuclear forces extend far beyond
> the perimiter of the atom. This strong-nuclear-force wave is amplified
> (gravity horn) during the reaction and channeled via wave-guides.
> These emissions of the amplified strong nuclear forces interact with
> the gravitational field, and for all intensive purposes are
> gravitational fields themselves. Deformations of space and time also
> arise in regions of gravitational interference.
>
> [...]

Oh my. Officially in the Deep End.
From: Strich.9 on
On Dec 22, 6:41 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> snip imbecilities

PD, we have been teaching you the incoherence of relativity for
years. That you have not grasped one straw means your cognitive
capacity for this kind of discussion is NIL.

The evidence is right in front of you. But you have been blind or
stupid.