From: " SNIP HECKLER>" on
X-No-Archive: Yes
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:02:13 -0800
From: " SNIP HECKLER>" on
X-No-Archive: Yes
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:42:25 -0500
From: Jared on
On Dec 11, 4:35 am, Tiger Would <theoreticalfo...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
> You are incorrect about this. The causality is genetic and
> the seperate reality is merely an interpretation of and
> further creation of a sensory experience which
> links the practical to the hypothetical to the nonsensical.

Identical twins are not 100% concordant for schizophrenia; that is, if
one has it, the other may not. So it is not correct to say "the
causality is genetic".
From: Tiger Would on
On Dec 12, 12:55 am, Jared <jared4...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 11, 4:35 am, Tiger Would <theoreticalfo...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > You are incorrect about this. The causality is genetic and
> > the seperate reality is merely an interpretation of and
> > further creation of a sensory experience which
> > links the practical to the hypothetical to the nonsensical.
>
> Identical twins are not 100% concordant for schizophrenia; that is, if
> one has it, the other may not. So it is not correct to say "the
> causality is genetic".

Identical twins are not identical.

---
tiger
From: " SNIP HECKLER>" on
X-No-Archive: Yes
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 02:09:25 -0800