From: Autymn D. C. on
On Dec 10, 5:03 am, jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv(a)aol> wrote:
> George Hammond wrote:
> > LOG   12-9-09   THE DETAILS OF LIFE AFTER DEATH
>
> <snip>
>
> There is no life after death; death mean the cessation
> of life.

Dolt: conception, resuscitation
From: George Hammond on
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 04:31:04 -0800 (PST), Errol
<vs.errol(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>On Dec 14, 7:11�am, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote:
>
>> I ve been thinking some more about the death stream
>> download after talking to Stuart Hameroff by e-mail.
>> Supposedly the death dream would be pre-recorded in a
>> running-edit mode during your entire life, every hour, every
>> second of every day. It would constantly be edited and
>> distilled, sort of the same process that they use to cut and
>> edit a Hollywood movie. This in fact, might even be the
>> primary function of nocturnal dreaming.
>> So this edited life after death scenario, or dream, is
>> residing in the microtubule system of the brain ready to
>> download in a few milliseconds at a moments notice should
>> death occur. The question then arises as to why this dream
>> would automatically download when you die. My answer to
>> that is that it must be completely natural, that is a
>> default mechanism of the death process itself. Supposedly,
>> the death dream is created by a natural mechanism having to
>> do with the growth deficit of the brain, and then when you
>> die, this pent-up font of "flat space" reality, by the same
>> token, just automatically bursts forth and floods the entire
>> cytoskeleton of the brain. And this is what produces "life
>> after death" so-called.
>> The underlying idea here is that the well-known Secular
>> Trend growth deficit causes a neuron shortage and therefore
>> the brain cannot actually perceive "true reality", that is
>> "flat subjective space" .. it can only perceive a "curved
>> version" (truncation) of subjective space-time a "curved
>> version" of reality as it were. However, our brain is able
>> to detect that what we are seeing is not completely real,
>> i.e. is curved rather than flat, so what it does, in some
>> analog fashion or other, is compute the "flat space
>> extrapolation" of what we actually see. Of course the
>> microtubule system cannot present this extrapolation to the
>> neuronal system because the neuronal system is not big
>> enough to display it. But it remains "pent-up" or "latent"
>> somewhere in the cytoskeleton, and through some process of
>> subconscious mentation, dreaming etc., it gets composed and
>> edited into what we are now calling "an afterlife dream
>> world".
>> Okay, that is how and why it gets composed. Now we have
>> to address, how and why it downloads at death. Presumably,
>> death occurs from the top down. That is, the neuronal
>> system shuts down or "flat lines" first. And then begins
>> the slower process of the disintegration of the
>> cytoskeleton-microtubule system. My first intuition would
>> be that the flat lining of the neuronal system is what
>> triggers the afterlife download in the cytoskeleton. Perhaps
>> for instance, the neuronal-cytoskeletal system is originally
>> a "closed loop" feedback system and when the neuronal system
>> flatlines at death the cytoskeleton system goes "open-loop"
>> and this simply causes the cytoskeleton system to "dump" any
>> heretofore undisplayed information into the entire
>> cytoskeleton whereas previously it was negative feedback
>> from the neuronal system that was truncating that
>> information and keeping it in check, i.e. keeping it pent-up
>> in the microtubule memory. That s one of certainly many
>> possibilities.
>> And I must add here, that this death dream signal may
>> not only flood just the cytoskeleton of the brain, it could
>> just as easily flood the cytoskeleton of the entire body
>> since the entire cytoskeleton of the brain is interconnected
>> by microwave gap junctions . This means that your entire
>> body and your entire brain, your entire sensory apparatus,
>> motor apparatus, and cognitive system would be experiencing
>> this dream firsthand. It would in other words, be
>> completely real! This is why the microtubule computer in
>> the brain is sufficient to do the job of Tipler s
>> "astronomical sized"computer". His computer was designed to
>> synthesize a human being from scratch, while nature has the
>> advantage of having the actual physical body in the form of
>> the cytoskeleton actually present in the microtubule
>> computer! This reduces the size of the necessary computer
>> by a "double exponential" sized factor! And this literally
>> brings the problem down to earth.
>>
>
>Why bother with the download anyway? Hameroff and Penrose suggested
>that the individual might leave traces in the Planck scale geometry
>anyway. I.O.W.S the individual might be permanently imprinted onto the
>universe. Go for the gold, not some fuzzy, edited version of
>reality.
>
>
[Hammond]
Na, na, na...... they have made the mistake of trying to
LEAPFROG over the CLASSICAL theory of God by speculating
about the as yet unknown QUANTUM theory of God.

This is as far off base as it would have been to LEAPFROG
over Newton's classical theory of gravity 100 years ago and
start speculating about a particle physics ( quantum)
theory of gravity. for Christ's sake we never would have
discovered the inverse square law and the law of planetary
motion if we had done that.
No, the CLASSICAL theory of God must be discovered BEFORE
the QUANTUM theory of God can be discovered.
HAMMOND has discovered and published the CLASSICAL physics
theory of God, and they are simply unaware of it.
========================================
GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
Primary site
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond
Mirror site
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=======================================
From: " SNIP HECKLER>" on
X-No-Archive: Yes
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 07:42:06 -0800
From: " SNIP HECKLER>" on
X-No-Archive: Yes
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 05:56:44 -0800
From: " SNIP HECKLER>" on
X-No-Archive: Yes
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 06:14:07 -0800